Filmmaker Aanand L Rai Criticises Eros for Releasing a Re-Edited Version of Raanjhanaa with an AI-Generated Climax
In a move that has sparked a fierce debate in the Indian film industry, director Aanand L Rai has expressed deep disapproval over the re-release of his critically acclaimed 2013 romantic drama Raanjhanaa. The film, which originally starred Dhanush and Sonam Kapoor, is set to return to theatres on 1 August 2025 with a major alteration—an AI-generated “happy ending” replacing the original, emotionally intense climax.
Eros International, the studio responsible for distributing the film, claims the updated version offers a fresh experience for new audiences. However, Rai was neither informed nor consulted about the change. He learned about the Raanjhanaa AI ending through social media platforms, which left him “shocked and disappointed.”
Also Read : Kareena Kapoor Lauds Priyanka Chopra’s ‘Global Domination’ in Heartfelt Birthday Tribute
Director Calls AI-Powered Ending a Dangerous Precedent That Could Undermine Creative Ownership and Authentic StorytellingSpeaking to multiple media outlets, Rai made it clear that the decision to digitally manipulate the original ending is not just a technical issue—it is a fundamental breach of creative trust. The Raanjhanaa AI ending removes the film’s tragic emotional core, where the lead character Kundan, played by Dhanush, sacrifices himself in a dramatic political setting.
“This isn’t just about a scene,” Rai said. “You’re altering the soul of a story people have loved for a decade. A happy ending might please a few, but it dilutes the very emotions that made the film powerful.”
He emphasized that using artificial intelligence to rewrite a filmmaker’s vision without their approval creates a dangerous precedent for future productions. “Studios could soon believe they have the right to reshape completed works for commercial gain. That’s not innovation—it’s distortion,” he added.
Eros International Defends the AI-Tweaked Version as a Creative Enhancement for Contemporary Viewers
In response to the criticism, Eros International released a statement defending their actions. The studio asserted that the AI-enhanced version is an “optional creative reinterpretation” intended to celebrate Raanjhanaa’s legacy while exploring technological innovation. The company also clarified that they hold the full copyright and legal rights to distribute the modified version.
Pradeep Dwivedi, CEO of Eros International, stated that the original film remains untouched and widely available on streaming platforms. “The new version isn’t replacing the original—it’s an additional experience for those curious about alternate narratives,” he explained.
Despite their assurances, Rai remains unconvinced. He argues that modifying a released film—especially without the consent of the director—crosses ethical boundaries, regardless of legal permissions. He has reportedly requested that his name be removed from all promotional material related to the re-release.
Re-Release Sparks Widespread Debate Over the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cinema and Storytelling
The Raanjhanaa AI ending has ignited a broader industry-wide debate over the role of artificial intelligence in filmmaking. While some praise AI as a tool for creativity and accessibility, others warn of the potential misuse that could lead to widespread manipulation of artistic works.
Rai voiced concerns about future implications: “What stops them from doing the same to Sholay, and giving Jai and Veeru a happy ending? Are we going to rewrite every emotional film that doesn’t conform to modern tastes?”
Legal experts have also pointed out that while copyright laws may favor producers, moral rights still protect creators from modifications that compromise their artistic reputation.
Industry Veterans and Cinephiles Voice Solidarity with Aanand L Rai Over Preservation of Original Artistic Vision
The controversy has drawn attention from various quarters of the film fraternity. Several filmmakers, screenwriters, and actors have publicly supported Rai’s stance, arguing that AI should be used to enhance future storytelling—not to revise the past. Cinephiles have also taken to social media to express disappointment, demanding that original works be respected and preserved.
Many fans of the original Raanjhanaa argue that its tragic ending is what gave the story emotional weight and staying power. They worry that the AI-driven version may reduce it to a generic romantic film lacking its defining impact.
The original climax, where Kundan chooses not to save himself because of his unrequited love for Zoya, is considered a poignant conclusion that elevated the film from ordinary to unforgettable.
Raanjhanaa’s Legacy and Its Relevance Amid a Technologically Shifting Cinematic Landscape
Released in 2013, Raanjhanaa earned widespread praise for its unconventional narrative, stellar performances, and A.R. Rahman’s music. The film grossed over ₹90 crore globally and developed a loyal fan base over the years. Its success also marked Dhanush’s Bollywood debut, showcasing his versatility as an actor.
The renewed partnership between Rai and Dhanush in the upcoming film Tere Ishk Mein, co-starring Kriti Sanon, had already drawn attention. The unexpected controversy surrounding Raanjhanaa’s re-release has now cast a shadow over their creative collaboration.
While Eros pushes forward with the AI-tweaked version, industry experts suggest that the debate around the Raanjhanaa AI ending will influence future decisions about digital edits, filmmaker rights, and the ethical use of artificial intelligence in storytelling.
The Raanjhanaa AI Ending Debate Could Shape the Future of Creative Freedom in Indian Cinema
The Raanjhanaa AI ending controversy is more than a dispute between a filmmaker and a studio—it is a litmus test for how the film industry navigates the use of technology in storytelling. As artificial intelligence becomes more accessible, clear ethical boundaries must be drawn to protect creative freedom and original expression.
For now, audiences will ultimately decide whether they prefer the integrity of the original vision or embrace the digitally re-imagined alternate ending. Either way, this case will be remembered as a defining moment in the evolving relationship between art and artificial intelligence.
