In a dramatic escalation of what is fast becoming India’s most-watched startup legal battle, BYJU’s founders Byju Raveendran and Divya Gokulnath have announced preparations for a $2.5 billion lawsuit against Glas Trust and associated creditors, alleging severe damage to their reputations and businesses. The move, declared through their legal counsel, represents not just a personal fight but a watershed moment for how corporate control disputes and cross-border insolvency issues are handled in India’s startup ecosystem.
The unprecedented value of the lawsuit—$2.5 billion—not only underscores the extent of damages the BYJU’s founders claim to have suffered, but also signals their determination to fight back methodically after months of mounting legal and reputational challenges. This valuation reflects not just short-term damage, but projected future earnings, brand value erosion, personal defamation, and potential investor loss due to negative press cycles. In many ways, the lawsuit may serve as a reputational reset, allowing the founders to reclaim control over their narrative in both domestic and international media, where the perception of mismanagement has gradually overwhelmed news of recovery efforts.
Amid the rising tensions, investor sentiment surrounding the edtech sector in India remains cautious but curious. BYJU’s, which once commanded a valuation of nearly $22 billion, had been viewed as a flagship startup representing India’s global aspirations. However, repeated governance lapses, murky financial disclosures, and fundraising delays have not only impacted BYJU’s trajectory but also cast a long shadow over newer edtech startups seeking fresh capital. Whether this lawsuit turns into a rallying cry in defense of Indian entrepreneurship or backfires due to provocative legal rhetoric will largely depend on how well the charges are substantiated and whether they align with broader public truth.
1. The Eye of the Storm: BYJU’s Legal Offensive
On July 18, 2025, reliable sources confirmed that Byju Raveendran and Divya Gokulnath are set to file a $2.5 billion suit against Glas Trust, a US-based lender agent now at the center of a multinational insolvency and reputational battle. Their lawsuit, intended to be launched in both Indian and overseas courts, accuses Glas Trust and other lender group members of orchestrating blatant reputational and financial harm to the founders and their parent company, Think & Learn.
This comes amid ongoing insolvency proceedings initiated after Glas Trust’s appeal on behalf of US lenders to whom BYJU’s owes $1.2 billion—making it not only a corporate drama, but a test case for cross-border legal enforceability and founder rights.
2. The Core of the Crisis: Reputational Damage
According to statements from Paris-based Lazareff Le Bars Eurl—BYJU’s international legal advisors—this is not just a business dispute, but a fight to defend personal names and corporate identity. “BYJU’s founders reserve all rights to bring actions against those parties that have caused damage to them personally and their businesses, including Think & Learn,” senior litigation advisor J Michael McNutt confirmed.
The founders allege that Glas Trust’s litigation tactics and media narrative have inflicted lasting harms to their public reputations, brand equity, and ongoing business prospects in India and globally.
3. From Lender to Controller: The Glas Trust Position
Glas Trust is the designated trustee and agent for a syndicate of US lenders who extended an eye-popping $1.2 billion term loan to BYJU’s US entity, Alpha. After BYJU’s defaulted on repayments, Glas Trust claimed control over Alpha and commenced asset recovery proceedings, including in US bankruptcy courts.
This aggressive maneuvering, BYJU’s alleges, was accompanied by a campaign of negative messaging and high-pressure legal action, deepening the founders’ reputational scars and threatening their ability to operate as entrepreneurs and educators.
4. Accusations and Counter-Accusations: The Battle Intensifies
The fight has already spiraled into a swirl of mutual allegations. Glas Trust, representing the lender group, has accused Raveendran, Gokulnath, and former chief strategy officer Anita Kishore of orchestrating a scheme to conceal and misappropriate $533 million from the original loan funds. On July 7, 2025, a US court even held Raveendran in civil contempt for non-compliance with document production orders.
BYJU’s, on the other hand, strongly denies all wrongdoing, claiming that Glas Trust is weaponizing default clauses and rumors to depress the company’s asset valuation and seize strategic control at the lowest point in its lifecycle. Divya Gokulnath has also formally challenged the US court’s jurisdiction over her, contesting the reach of American legal claims into Indian business matters.
5. NCLT and Indian Legal Fronts: A Multi-Jurisdictional War
As Glas Trust pushes its insolvency case abroad, the fight has also spilled into India’s National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Riju Ravindran, a former BYJU’s parent company director, last month petitioned NCLT to remove Glas Trust as a financial creditor and from the Committee of Creditors, challenging the legal standing of the US-based lenders and the actions taken so far.
This multi-pronged strategy mirrors an emerging trend among high-profile Indian startups: using local tribunals to defend domestic interests against foreign courts’ decisions, thereby complicating the dispute landscape and raising the stakes for cross-border debt enforcement.
6. A Blow for India’s Startup Ecosystem
Observers agree that this lawsuit, if filed and fought publicly, could have vast implications for India’s booming but now-challenged startup ecosystem. It signals a new phase where founders are willing to counterattack global investors and creditors, pushing back against what they see as predatory tactics or overreach.
Analysts warn that this adversarial approach could make future cross-border fundraising more complex, as international lenders seek stronger legal shields and clearer contract terms before injecting money into Indian high-growth ventures.
7. Glas Trust’s Response: “Distraction From Facts”
Glas Trust has dismissed the threatened lawsuit as a “transparent attempt to distract from the facts” and points to recent court decisions—especially the US contempt order against Raveendran—as proof of their case’s merit. In public statements, the trust reiterates that the courts have consistently ruled in its favor and contends that BYJU’s reputational crisis is self-inflicted through mismanagement and non-compliance.
They argue that their enforcement steps—including assuming control of Alpha, pursuing bankruptcy proceedings, and seeking document disclosures—are justified under international lending and insolvency laws.
8. Why This $2.5 Billion Counterattack Matters
Such a lawsuit, which explicitly targets “personal and business” harm for billions of dollars, is without precedent in the Indian edtech and startup sector. It threatens to reshape norms of founder-investor dispute resolution, especially where global debt, offshore holding structures, and cross-border legal claims collide.
Experts say this could become a template for other embattled founders facing similar lender takeovers or forced asset sales, changing the risk calculus for VCs, PE funds, and institutional lenders in India’s turbulent growth stage market.
9. What Happens Next: The Road Forward
With legal teams now preparing filings both in Indian and international courts, the next steps are closely watched by the business community, investors, and entrepreneurs alike. The key questions:
-
Can BYJU’s founders prove reputational harm and link it to creditor behavior?
-
Will Indian courts side with the founders and overrule or resist foreign tribunal decisions?
-
Could the founders’ counterattack force Glas Trust and the lender group back to the negotiating table and enable a settlement—a scenario some suggest is now more likely as uncertainty grows?
Meanwhile, the underlying operational crisis at BYJU’s remains unresolved. Student and parent confidence, already tested by months of negative headlines and public layoffs, now hinges on the possibility of a turnaround or at least stability in leadership and vision.
Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Indian Business
In summary, BYJU’s founders’ $2.5 billion lawsuit plans mark one of the most explosive developments in Indian startup history, at a time when the industry faces global scrutiny about founder accountability, investor rights, and the limits of debt-fueled expansion. Whether this high-profile legal move results in victory, stalemate, or even a negotiated truce, it is certain to set new benchmarks for how India’s founders and financial backers wage—or resolve—their most dramatic corporate battles.
For now, the world watches as India’s most famous edtech entrepreneur duo put it all on the line, seeking both justice for themselves and a precedent for future generations of visionaries.
One salient aspect observers are monitoring is the personal risk to Byju Raveendran and Divya Gokulnath. While both have stepped down or distanced themselves from operational positions in recent months, their personal reputations as visionary founders still carry massive symbolic weight in the business community. A win in this lawsuit could offer a path to rehabilitation—perhaps even a return to boardrooms or the public stage. Conversely, if courts find the Glas Trust group’s actions lawful and necessary, the fallout for the founders could include restricted business activity, further financial liabilities, and continued erosion of public trust.
Meanwhile, BYJU’s internal roadmap is reportedly being recast. With legal battles consuming attention and liquidity constraints slowing growth, the platform’s core digital learning services have reportedly consolidated into fewer product lines. Layoffs across regional offices, center closures, and service cuts have left students and parents questioning the platform’s long-term usability, though the company insists that core services continue to function and have been refocused on Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities. The company is also rumored to be restructuring its international business units, especially in the US and Middle East, where some operations have stalled during debt proceedings.
Across India, from Bengaluru’s startup campuses to Delhi’s incubators, the ongoing BYJU’s saga is being dissected as a cautionary tale—one of unchecked ambition, complex offshore finance structures, and the dangers of thin accountability within unicorn cultures. For newer founders, the message is clear: structure your cap table wisely, manage investor relations transparently, and prepare diligently for cross-border legalities in an era when global capital fuels local innovation. Whether BYJU’s battle ends in vindication or fracture, it will likely inspire lectures, documentaries, and case studies in India’s evolving business schools for years to come.
Follow: Byjus
Also Read: Shocking Twists as Kannada Star Ranya Rao Gets 1-Year Jail in ₹12.5 Crore Gold Smuggling Scandal
