Zoo Animal Record Discrepancies — After the recent revelations of discrepancies in the animal census at the Padmaja Naidu Himalayan Zoological Park (PNHZP) in Darjeeling, further inspections have uncovered similar mismatches in other government-run zoos across West Bengal. The unfolding issue has sparked widespread concern regarding the accuracy of animal records, transparency in zoo administration, and overall wildlife management practices in the state.
Discrepancies Extend Beyond Darjeeling Zoo
Officials from the West Bengal Zoo Authority, under the aegis of the State Forest Department, began cross-checking animal records in light of the discrepancies at PNHZP. What emerged was an alarming pattern — mismatches between official animal census reports and the physical stock registers in at least four other zoos, including North Bengal Wild Animals Park in Siliguri, Rasikbeel Mini Zoo in Cooch Behar, and Adina Deer Park in Malda.
At some facilities, the number of animals recorded during central audits did not tally with internal documentation maintained by the zoos. These inconsistencies have thrown into question the integrity of wildlife recordkeeping and the oversight mechanisms currently in place.
Forest Department insiders indicate that discrepancies range from missing birds and reptiles to unaccounted mammals in various enclosures. While some could be the result of clerical errors or delayed reporting, others are suspected to point toward mismanagement, negligence, or even foul play.
Zoo Animal Record Discrepancies: What Triggered the Investigation
The controversy began when a report by the Central Zoo Authority (CZA) flagged serious concerns about record-keeping at PNHZP — one of India’s most prestigious high-altitude zoos, known for its snow leopards and red pandas. The number of certain species listed in the annual animal inventory failed to match the figures in the on-ground inspection report.
Upon scrutiny, the zoo claimed that some animals were moved for breeding or transferred to other facilities, but failed to provide sufficient documentation. This prompted the Forest Department to launch a broader audit across other zoos in the state.
Response from the State Government
West Bengal Forest Minister Birbaha Hansda acknowledged the seriousness of the issue and ordered immediate internal audits of all state-run zoos. “We have zero tolerance for misreporting. Action will be taken against any official found guilty of negligence or manipulation,” she said.
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife) Debal Ray confirmed that a detailed fact-finding report is being prepared. “These audits are important not just for compliance with CZA norms, but to ensure ethical wildlife management,” he added.
Systemic Loopholes in Record-Keeping
Experts point out that many smaller zoos and animal parks in Bengal suffer from poor infrastructure, understaffing, and outdated inventory management systems. In some cases, daily logs are still maintained manually, leading to higher chances of error or tampering.
“There needs to be a digitized, transparent, and real-time system of animal inventory and transfer tracking,” said wildlife conservationist Anirban Das. “If discrepancies exist, it not only affects conservation efforts but also damages public trust.”
Further concerns revolve around the lack of independent oversight in most zoos. Many facilities rely on internal reviews with no third-party verification. This opens the door to data manipulation, especially in cases involving animal exchanges or deaths.
Impact on Conservation and Breeding Programs
The mismatches in records may also affect breeding programs, especially for endangered species like the red panda, Himalayan monal, and the Indian wolf, for which Bengal’s zoos are important centers.
CZA mandates annual animal inventory reports as part of species survival and breeding program assessments. Any misreporting in these can jeopardize funding, collaboration with international institutions, and species conservation goals.
According to a senior zoo curator, “A single undocumented transfer or death can create a genetic gap in a breeding lineage, which is crucial for species reintroduction programs.”
Public Reaction and Calls for Reform
Animal welfare groups and citizen-led watchdog organizations have expressed outrage over the inconsistencies. A petition is circulating on Change.org demanding an independent audit of all state zoos and the establishment of an ombudsman for wildlife welfare in Bengal.
Citizens have also taken to social media, questioning the accountability of forest officials and highlighting the need for greater transparency in managing wildlife institutions funded by public money.
Several RTI activists have reportedly filed applications seeking detailed data on animal transfers, deaths, births, and funding at key zoos in the last five years.
Relevant External Links and Resources
- Central Zoo Authority (CZA) Guidelines and Reports
- MoEFCC: Guidelines on Zoo Management – Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
- National Wildlife Action Plan 2017–2031 (Government of India)
- Padmaja Naidu Himalayan Zoological Park Official Website
- West Bengal Zoo Authority – Department of Forests, Government of West Bengal
Next Steps and Long-Term Reforms
To restore public confidence and ensure compliance with national zoo management protocols, experts suggest the following actions:
- Biometric Tagging and Microchipping
Every animal in captivity should be tagged with biometric or microchip IDs linked to a central database, minimizing the risk of error or cover-up. - Digitization of Records
A state-wide software system for real-time data entry, with cross-access for CZA and state officials, can significantly improve oversight. - Third-Party Audits
Introducing periodic external audits by wildlife NGOs or academic institutions can bring objectivity to the monitoring process. - Training and Capacity Building
Zoo staff, especially in rural or mini zoos, must be trained in modern inventory and care standards. Budget allocations must reflect this requirement. - Greater Legal Accountability
Zoo officials found guilty of negligence or manipulation should face penalties under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
Conclusion
The emerging crisis around animal inventory mismatches in Bengal’s zoos is not merely a bureaucratic error — it reflects a deeper institutional failure in wildlife management. With endangered species and public accountability at stake, urgent reforms are needed to align Bengal’s zoos with national and global conservation standards.
The forest department’s response in the coming weeks will determine whether this is treated as an isolated blip or the wake-up call the state’s wildlife infrastructure desperately needs.
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
