Kolkata – The Kolkata gang rape case involving a 24-year-old law student has taken an even more disturbing turn as shocking details emerged during court proceedings on Tuesday. The case, which has sent shockwaves through the city’s legal community, reveals the calculated cruelty of the three accused who purchased an inhaler for the victim’s panic attack solely to continue their brutal assault.
Public prosecutor Sourin Ghosal presented horrifying details of the Kolkata gang rape case before the court, describing how the perpetrators showed a complete disregard for human dignity and compassion. The incident, which occurred at South Calcutta Law College on June 25, has exposed serious security lapses and raised urgent questions about student safety in educational institutions.
This particular Kolkata gang rape case has gained significant attention not only for its brutality but also for the methodical way the accused planned and executed their crime. The revelation that they purchased medical aid for the victim only to facilitate further torture demonstrates a level of premeditation and cruelty that has shocked legal experts and the public alike.
Detailed Account of the Kolkata Gang Rape Case Assault
According to the prosecutor’s statement in the Kolkata gang rape case, the 24-year-old victim experienced a severe panic attack during the assault, making it difficult for her to breathe. In a desperate plea for help, she begged her attackers to take her to a hospital for medical treatment, hoping this might end her ordeal and provide her with the medical attention she urgently needed.
However, the accused in this Kolkata gang rape case showed no mercy or compassion toward the victim’s medical distress. Instead of providing the humanitarian assistance she desperately needed, they chose to purchase an inhaler from a nearby pharmacy with the sole intention of temporarily alleviating her breathing difficulties so they could continue their assault.
“When the victim had a panic attack and was unable to breathe, the accused persons instead of taking her to a hospital gave her an inhaler so that she feels better and they could torture her again,” prosecutor Ghosal told the Calcutta High Court, highlighting the calculated nature of this Kolkata gang rape case.
The victim’s own statement in the Kolkata gang rape case corroborates these disturbing details, providing a firsthand account of the terror and helplessness she experienced during the assault. Her complaint reveals the manipulative and cruel behavior of the main accused, Monojit Mishra, who orchestrated the purchase of the inhaler while showing complete disregard for her suffering.
Victim’s Testimony in Kolkata Gang Rape Case
The survivor’s detailed statement in the Kolkata gang rape case provides crucial evidence about the sequence of events and the roles played by each accused. According to her testimony, when she suffered the panic attack and experienced severe breathing difficulties, she made desperate pleas for medical help, asking to be taken to a hospital.
“I had a panic attack and shortness of breath. Mishra asked Ahmed and Mukherjee to come inside the room. I asked for help from them. I asked them to take me to the hospital. But they were not helping me. Then Mishra told them to bring an inhaler for me,” the victim stated in her complaint regarding this Kolkata gang rape case.
The victim’s account reveals how the main accused, Monojit Mishra, instructed his accomplices Zaib Ahmed and Pramit Mukherjee to purchase the inhaler. This testimony has become crucial evidence in the Kolkata gang rape case, demonstrating the premeditated nature of the crime and the accused’s calculated approach to continuing their assault.
Her statement also reveals that even after receiving temporary relief from the inhaler, her ordeal was far from over. The accused in this Kolkata gang rape case continued their assault, showing that their purchase of the medical device was purely instrumental, designed to facilitate further torture rather than provide genuine assistance.
Evidence Collection in Kolkata Gang Rape Case
Police investigation in the Kolkata gang rape case has been thorough and methodical, with investigators successfully tracking down crucial evidence that corroborates the victim’s account. The authorities located the specific pharmacy from where the inhaler was purchased, providing concrete evidence of the accused’s movements and actions during the incident.
The investigation team in the Kolkata gang rape case also seized the receipt showing the ₹350 payment made through UPI for the inhaler purchase. This digital evidence provides an electronic trail that definitively links the accused to the purchase and supports the victim’s testimony about the sequence of events during the assault.
Zaib Ahmed has been identified as the person who physically purchased the inhaler from the nearby pharmacy, according to police findings in the Kolkata gang rape case. This specific detail helps establish the individual roles and responsibilities of each accused in the commission of this heinous crime.
The comprehensive evidence collection in this Kolkata gang rape case includes digital footprints, medical tests, and forensic examination of the crime scene, all of which have corroborated the survivor’s complaint and strengthened the prosecution’s case against the accused.
Accused Individuals in Kolkata Gang Rape Case
The three primary accused in the Kolkata gang rape case have distinct connections to South Calcutta Law College, highlighting serious institutional security failures. Monojit Mishra, identified as the main accused, worked as temporary staff at the college and is also an alumnus of the institution, giving him intimate knowledge of the premises and access to various areas.
The other two accused in the Kolkata gang rape case, Zaib Ahmed and Pramit Mukherjee, were current students at the college at the time of the incident. Their status as students provided them with legitimate access to college facilities, which they exploited to commit this heinous crime against their fellow student.
Additionally, the Kolkata gang rape case has implicated a college security guard named Pinaki Bandyopadhyay, who was arrested for allegedly turning a blind eye to the crime. His alleged complicity raises serious questions about institutional oversight and the effectiveness of security measures designed to protect students.
Legal Proceedings and Custody Details
All three main accused in the Kolkata gang rape case have been remanded to police custody until July 8, providing investigators with sufficient time to conduct thorough interrogations and gather additional evidence. This extended custody period reflects the serious nature of the charges and the complexity of the investigation.
The court’s decision to grant extended police custody in the Kolkata gang rape case demonstrates the judicial system’s recognition of the gravity of the charges and the need for comprehensive investigation. The custody period will allow police to conduct detailed questioning and potentially uncover additional evidence or accomplices.
Institutional Response to Kolkata Gang Rape Case
South Calcutta Law College has taken immediate disciplinary action in response to the Kolkata gang rape case. According to vice principal Nayna Chatterji, Monojit Mishra’s services have been terminated from the college, effectively ending his employment and association with the institution.
The college has also rusticated Zaib Ahmed and Pramit Mukherjee, the two student accused in the Kolkata gang rape case. This disciplinary action removes them from the college permanently, ensuring they cannot continue their studies at the institution where they committed this heinous crime.
Closing Statements & Ongoing Investigation
The Kolkata gang rape case continues to unfold as investigators work to build a comprehensive case against all accused individuals. The disturbing details revealed so far underscore the calculated cruelty involved in this crime and highlight the urgent need for enhanced security measures in educational institutions. The case serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerability of students and the importance of creating safe learning environments for all.
