10% of Primary School Vacancies Reserved — In a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding primary teacher recruitment in West Bengal, the Calcutta High Court was informed that 10% of the vacancies in primary schools had been earmarked for para-teachers. This disclosure was made by the senior counsel representing the state government during a key hearing into the controversial 2016 Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) and related appointments.
The hearing, part of the broader case involving alleged irregularities in primary teacher recruitment under the West Bengal Board of Primary Education (WBBPE), holds major implications for thousands of candidates and contractual educators across the state.
Who Are Para-Teachers?
Para-teachers are contractual teaching staff hired to address teacher shortages, particularly in rural and underprivileged areas. These educators often receive lower pay and fewer benefits than regular teachers but play a critical role in maintaining classroom functioning, especially in single-teacher schools or during recruitment lags.
According to the state’s submissions, para-teachers were promised priority access to regular teaching positions, and a 10% reservation quota was created to regularize their services—a provision now at the heart of the legal dispute.
What the Court Was Told
Senior Advocate Kalyan Banerjee, appearing for the state, informed the Division Bench that:
- The 10% quota for para-teachers was part of a 2016 government policy aimed at absorbing qualified para-teachers into permanent teaching roles.
- The state followed a policy-driven process, not arbitrary decisions, in implementing the quota.
- The selection of para-teachers under this quota did not violate the merit list structure as per the rules of the West Bengal Primary Education Act.
This statement was part of the state’s defence against multiple petitions alleging that the inclusion of para-teachers in the 2016 appointments lacked transparency and compromised fairness.
10% of Primary School Vacancies Reserved: Background of the Dispute
The controversy dates back to the 2014 and 2016 TET examinations, where thousands of candidates were recruited as primary teachers. Since then, multiple allegations have emerged, including:
- Discrepancies in selection procedures
- Favouritism and manipulation of merit lists
- Unauthorised inclusion of candidates
- Issuance of appointment letters outside the published merit list
The inclusion of para-teachers under a special quota, many argue, bypassed more meritorious candidates, violating both constitutional principles and judicial orders.
Legal Viewpoint
The Calcutta High Court has been hearing petitions from both:
- Unemployed TET-qualified candidates who claim they were unfairly denied appointments.
- Para-teachers who argue that they were assured permanent appointments under the government’s own regularization policy.
During the hearing, the court also asked whether para-teachers appointed through this quota had undergone the same evaluation parameters as general candidates. The answer to this question will determine whether the 10% quota stands up to legal scrutiny.
Role of the Enforcement Directorate and CBI
The teacher recruitment scam is already under investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Several officials from the education department and the WBBPE have been questioned or arrested for their alleged roles in manipulating teacher appointments for monetary or political gain.
This includes:
- Irregular issuance of recommendation letters
- Tampering with OMR sheets
- Inclusion of non-meritorious candidates via backdoor methods
The para-teacher quota issue, while not directly linked to monetary corruption, now becomes a constitutional and procedural concern.
Key Legal Questions Before the Court
- Was the 10% para-teacher quota legally sanctioned and notified in time?
- Did this quota override merit-based selection rules?
- Were para-teachers evaluated fairly under TET norms?
- Does the quota breach constitutional equality under Article 14?
- Should para-teachers lose their appointments if the process is deemed irregular?
The court is expected to weigh these questions against state policy precedents and earlier Supreme Court rulings on quota implementation in education jobs.
Policy Implications
If upheld, the 10% quota could become a precedent for contractual teachers across India seeking permanent employment. However, critics warn that:
- It may open the floodgates to quota-based recruitment without merit parity.
- It could disadvantage qualified fresh candidates, particularly in urban zones.
- It may fuel further litigation in education recruitment.
Educationists React
Academics and education policy experts have responded with mixed views.
- Pro-quota voices argue that para-teachers, many of whom have served for over a decade, deserve stabilization and dignity of work.
- Opponents caution that regularizing contract workers without uniform assessment may compromise teaching quality and hurt deserving candidates.
Voices from the Ground
Para-teachers from across districts like Bankura, Purulia, and Birbhum have staged rallies demanding regularization. One para-teacher said:
“We have been teaching for years, many of us in remote villages. If we aren’t absorbed now, it will be a betrayal.”
Meanwhile, rejected TET candidates are protesting outside the WBBPE office, holding placards reading “No jobs without merit” and “Justice for TET-qualified aspirants.”
External Resources
- West Bengal Board of Primary Education: http://www.wbbpe.org
Updates on recruitment, guidelines, and TET notices. - Department of School Education, WB: https://banglarshiksha.gov.in
Government policies, school staffing data, and recruitment acts. - National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE): https://ncte.gov.in
Regulatory body for TET standards and teacher training programs. - Ministry of Education, India: https://www.education.gov.in
Guidelines on teacher eligibility, RTE Act compliance, and appointment rules. - Landmark SC Judgement on Regularisation: Umadevi Case Summary
Legal framework on appointment of contractual staff in public service.
What’s Next?
The High Court is expected to resume hearing the matter later this month. A verdict will not only determine the fate of thousands of para-teachers, but may also redefine recruitment norms in the state’s education sector.
Meanwhile, the WBBPE is under increasing pressure to release a corrected and transparent merit list for all appointments made in 2016–2018, including clarification on the para-teacher inclusion policy.
Final Word
At the heart of the debate lies a difficult question: Can years of service compensate for a lack of formal merit? And in correcting recruitment wrongs, how can the state balance justice for para-teachers with fairness for general TET aspirants?
As the courtroom deliberates, thousands await a verdict that could reset both their careers and the credibility of West Bengal’s teacher recruitment system.
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
