West Bengal Social Media Misinformation: The West Bengal government intensifies its crackdown on social media misinformation amid Operation Sindoor tensions. Law enforcement targets inflammatory and false content to maintain communal harmony.
In the wake of heightened national security concerns following India’s Operation Sindoor, West Bengal has found itself at the forefront of a rapidly escalating internal vigilance campaign. Operation Sindoor, a decisive military response to the Pahalgam terror attack that left dozens of civilians dead, has not only intensified Indo-Pak tensions on the international front but also triggered a sweeping wave of domestic security alerts across India. As emotions run high and national unity takes center stage, state authorities in West Bengal have markedly escalated their efforts to curb any form of dissent, perceived disloyalty, or digital misinformation that could threaten the fabric of internal harmony.
Over the past week, the state has witnessed a noticeable surge in arrests connected to alleged anti-India social media posts, marking a new chapter in the ongoing battle between freedom of expression and national security enforcement. West Bengal Police, in coordination with cybercrime units and local intelligence branches, has increased its digital surveillance operations across platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, WhatsApp, and Telegram. The focus of this operation has been on monitoring online content that may be considered inflammatory, provocative, or supportive of hostile foreign powers or ideologies — particularly in light of the ongoing conflict triggered by Operation Sindoor.
According to police officials, the crackdown is not a blanket campaign against dissent but a targeted action against those who are actively promoting narratives that either justify the terror attack, question the legitimacy of India’s military response, or appear to echo propaganda aligned with hostile elements. In several districts, especially border regions such as Murshidabad, Malda, North 24 Parganas, and Darjeeling, law enforcement has reportedly detained individuals for questioning after flagging suspicious posts, comments, or shares that allegedly “undermine India’s sovereignty or incite communal unrest.”
A senior official from the West Bengal Cyber Cell, speaking on condition of anonymity, explained, “We are closely watching public digital discourse. Given the seriousness of the present situation, even a seemingly small post that calls into question the government’s actions, or appears to encourage divisiveness, could lead to potential unrest or radicalization. That is why we are acting swiftly.”
The official added that several First Information Reports (FIRs) have already been filed under relevant sections of the Information Technology Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), and the Indian Penal Code, including charges of sedition and inciting hatred. The arrested individuals have been accused of either creating content themselves or sharing it without verifying its authenticity or implications, which, authorities argue, makes them complicit in the spread of harmful misinformation.
This aggressive crackdown has, however, sparked a heated debate among civil rights activists, legal experts, and political commentators. While some applaud the authorities for acting decisively to prevent internal destabilization during a period of heightened threat perception, others caution against the overreach of executive power and the chilling effect on free speech, especially when “anti-national” is a loosely defined term that can be subjectively applied.
Legal expert and constitutional scholar Dr. Ananya Sen commented, “It is one thing to penalize actual incitement to violence or terrorism. But we must be very careful when criminalizing mere criticism of the government or expression of alternate viewpoints. In a democracy, patriotism cannot be enforced through surveillance and arrests. That’s a slippery slope.”
Nonetheless, the West Bengal government has defended its position, reiterating that no arbitrary arrests are being made and that all actions are being taken based on concrete digital evidence in compliance with national security protocols. In a press briefing, State Home Secretary Partha Ghosh stated, “We are in an extraordinary moment of national importance. The unity of the nation cannot be compromised by individuals who exploit digital platforms to propagate hate, misinformation, or foreign agendas. Every step we take is aimed at ensuring peace, harmony, and the dignity of our armed forces.”
The current wave of arrests also reflects a broader trend being witnessed in other states such as Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and Jammu & Kashmir, where local authorities have similarly initiated legal actions against individuals accused of spreading “anti-India rhetoric” following Operation Sindoor. Social media companies have been asked to cooperate with law enforcement by taking down flagged content and sharing IP addresses and account information of users under investigation.
As the situation continues to unfold, the people of West Bengal — particularly its younger, more digitally active demographic — are walking a tightrope between nationalistic fervor and personal freedoms, aware that even a single social media post could result in consequences ranging from interrogation to arrest. For now, the atmosphere in the state remains tense, marked by both patriotic solidarity and rising apprehension over what may come next in this delicate balancing act between state security and civil liberty.
West Bengal Social Media Misinformation: Operation Sindoor and Its Aftermath
Operation Sindoor, a high-intensity military campaign launched by the Indian Armed Forces on May 7, 2025, marked one of the most decisive retaliatory actions by India in recent years. The operation comprised precision missile strikes and coordinated aerial assaults targeting strategic hideouts and infrastructure linked to Pakistan-based militant organizations, primarily Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). These groups, long designated as terrorist entities by international agencies, were held responsible for orchestrating the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, 2025 — a horrific incident that claimed the lives of 28 civilians, most of whom were domestic tourists from West Bengal and Maharashtra.
The Pahalgam attack, which involved gunfire and grenade blasts near a popular tourist enclave in Jammu and Kashmir, sent shockwaves across the nation. It not only led to widespread public mourning and anger but also triggered an immediate call for justice and decisive action from both the public and political leadership. In response, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, after an emergency meeting of the National Security Council, authorized Operation Sindoor — a military endeavor designed to eliminate terrorist leadership and dismantle logistical networks across the Line of Control (LoC) and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
Within hours of its launch, Indian media outlets reported the destruction of several high-value targets, including weapons stockpiles, training camps, and communication hubs used by militants. Indian Air Force and Army Special Forces were believed to have worked in tandem, executing a calculated strike strategy using satellite-guided munitions and real-time drone surveillance. The operation was lauded domestically for its precision, scale, and symbolic message: India will no longer tolerate terror with impunity.
However, the aftermath of Operation Sindoor has been complex and multi-dimensional. While it has strengthened India’s image as a security-conscious nation determined to protect its citizens, it has also significantly escalated tensions with Pakistan. The Pakistani government, denying any involvement in the Pahalgam attack, condemned the strikes as a “blatant violation of sovereignty” and threatened retaliatory measures. Cross-border skirmishes have since intensified, with both sides accusing each other of ceasefire violations along the LoC.
Back home, the situation has taken a different but equally serious turn. Amid heightened patriotism and national security concerns, the Indian government has increased its vigilance on internal fronts, particularly regarding digital platforms and public discourse. Intelligence agencies and state police forces, including those in West Bengal, have been instructed to closely monitor social media for posts, videos, and narratives that could be interpreted as anti-national, divisive, or sympathetic to enemy propaganda.
This atmosphere of heightened scrutiny has also reignited debates around civil liberties, especially concerning the right to free speech and dissent in a democracy. Critics argue that while national security must be preserved at all costs, it is equally essential to prevent a climate of fear and repression. On the other hand, many citizens have supported the government’s proactive stance, asserting that extraordinary times demand extraordinary measures, and that unity is paramount when the nation is under threat.
In this tense geopolitical and domestic context, the fallout from Operation Sindoor continues to unfold — not only along international borders but also within the heart of the nation, where law enforcement agencies are now navigating a new battleground: the digital space, public opinion, and civil liberties in a time of conflict.
West Bengal Social Media Misinformation: Arrests in West Bengal
In the backdrop of heightened national alert following Operation Sindoor, the state of West Bengal has become a focal point in the wider effort to clamp down on individuals allegedly involved in activities or expressions considered anti-national. Among the most significant developments in this regard is the arrest of two individuals in Siliguri — a prominent urban center in North Bengal — for allegedly posting inflammatory and anti-India content on social media. The case has garnered considerable media attention, not only for its disturbing content but also for the broader socio-political implications it carries.
The accused have been identified as Rajat Bhattacharya and Giridhari Roy, both local residents with active online presence. According to police sources, the two men were apprehended after a video began circulating widely across social media platforms. The video, believed to have been recorded in late April 2025, shows the duo confronting and harassing job aspirants from the neighboring state of Bihar, specifically targeting those who had traveled to Siliguri in search of employment opportunities.
In the video, Rajat and Giridhari are seen questioning the domicile status of the Bihari youths, aggressively interrogating them about why they were seeking jobs in West Bengal. The tone of the interaction was not only hostile but also humiliating, with the accused making derogatory remarks about the migrants’ socio-economic background and education levels. Most shockingly, the duo falsely claimed to be officers from the Intelligence Bureau (IB), a central government intelligence agency, in an apparent attempt to assert authority and intimidate the job seekers.
Local police officials, upon being alerted to the video’s circulation and its potentially incendiary communal and regionalist tone, launched an immediate investigation. Based on digital forensics and witness statements, both Rajat Bhattacharya and Giridhari Roy were taken into custody under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups), Section 419 (cheating by personation), and relevant provisions under the Information Technology Act, which criminalizes the dissemination of false information and impersonation on digital platforms.
Their arrest has sparked a wave of political controversy, especially given the sensitive timing — coming just days after the launch of Operation Sindoor, when the national discourse is highly polarized around issues of patriotism, unity, and national security. Union Minister Giriraj Singh, a senior BJP leader from Bihar, was quick to weigh in on the issue. In a sharply worded statement, Singh condemned the incident and accused the West Bengal government, led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, of fostering a climate where “outsiders” — particularly migrants from Hindi-speaking states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh — face increasing hostility and discrimination.
“Is this the new Bengal under Mamata Banerjee?” Singh asked during a press interaction. “We are witnessing a situation where job seekers are not only humiliated on camera but also threatened in the name of national intelligence agencies. This is a complete breakdown of law and order and an insult to our federal democratic structure.”
The Trinamool Congress (TMC), currently in power in West Bengal, has responded cautiously to the allegations. While government spokespersons have distanced the state administration from the actions of the accused, they have also questioned the BJP’s attempts to politicize the incident. In an official statement, the West Bengal Home Department emphasized that “swift legal action was taken against the individuals involved, and such behavior is not condoned or protected by any administrative body in the state.” The government reiterated its commitment to maintaining law and order, as well as protecting the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of state or region of origin.
However, critics have pointed out that this incident is not isolated. Over the past few years, there have been multiple cases where non-Bengali-speaking migrants have reportedly faced discrimination or social tension in parts of West Bengal, especially during job drives and competitive recruitment events. While these incidents have not always attracted national attention, the volatile national mood post-Operation Sindoor has amplified the visibility and gravity of the situation.
The impersonation of Intelligence Bureau officers has added another layer of seriousness to the case. Experts warn that such false representation, especially in today’s environment of heightened security sensitivity, could easily mislead citizens, provoke fear, and undermine the credibility of real security agencies. The Ministry of Home Affairs has reportedly sought a preliminary report from the West Bengal Police on the matter, particularly regarding whether the impersonation was part of a larger agenda or an isolated act of vigilantism.
Legal proceedings against the duo are expected to begin soon. In the meantime, cyber experts and civil rights organizations have renewed calls for greater digital literacy and civic awareness, pointing out that many social media users often do not understand the legal ramifications of spreading hate speech or misinformation online — especially when it comes to matters of national integration, security, and communal harmony.
The arrests in Siliguri represent not just a law enforcement response but also a sociopolitical flashpoint, underscoring the delicate balance that needs to be maintained between ensuring internal security, respecting inter-state unity, and protecting individual freedoms. As India navigates this turbulent period following Operation Sindoor, such incidents in states like West Bengal are likely to be closely scrutinized — both by the public and policymakers — for what they signify about the health of Indian democracy and its federal ethos.
State’s Response to Social Media Misinformation
The West Bengal government has raised alarms about the growing misuse of social media to circulate misinformation and provoke communal unrest. In response to recent developments, state law enforcement authorities have been instructed to intensify surveillance of digital platforms and take strict measures against those responsible for spreading false, provocative, or divisive content online.
The arrests in West Bengal underscore the delicate balance between national security and freedom of expression. As the country navigates the complexities arising from Operation Sindoor and its domestic implications, the importance of responsible discourse, both online and offline, becomes paramount. The state’s proactive measures aim to maintain communal harmony and uphold the nation’s integrity during these challenging times.
DO FOLLOW:
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
