The Karnataka Social and Educational Survey, a massive state-wide exercise aimed at gathering caste and demographic data, has faced growing challenges as enumerators struggle with long working hours, delayed payments, and at times, hostile responses from the public. Officials from several districts have acknowledged that the workload has been intense, particularly with the government pressing to complete data collection within a strict deadline. Enumerators, many of whom are schoolteachers or local volunteers, have reported feeling overburdened and unappreciated despite the survey’s importance to state policy and welfare planning.
Exhaustion and Long Working Hours
Enumerators across Karnataka have reported extreme physical and mental fatigue as they navigate long hours of fieldwork, often under harsh weather conditions. Many spend upwards of ten to twelve hours daily, walking long distances in villages or navigating congested urban neighborhoods. The burden is compounded by administrative expectations to meet strict daily quotas. Teachers and volunteers who take part in the survey find themselves juggling professional responsibilities alongside data collection duties. Such exhaustive schedules have led to complaints of burnout, sleep deprivation, and physical strain, yet most enumerators continue due to a sense of civic duty and commitment to the state’s developmental objectives.
Hostile Responses from Citizens
In several districts, enumerators have encountered hostility from residents suspicious of the survey’s purpose. Some households refused to provide caste or socio-economic details, while others questioned the legitimacy of the survey itself. Enumerators have reported verbal abuse and, in rare cases, threats, forcing officials to intervene for protection. Misconceptions circulating on social media—such as claims that the survey data will be politically exploited—have heightened resistance. To mitigate tensions, district administrations have instructed enumerators to adopt calm and patient communication strategies, emphasizing confidentiality and the developmental intent behind the survey.
Technical Challenges in Data Collection
The digital nature of the Karnataka survey has presented additional hurdles for field staff. Enumerators often face software glitches, difficulties in saving entries, and frequent app crashes, particularly in areas with weak internet connectivity. Many enumerators reported that training was insufficient to handle technical issues, forcing reliance on supervisors and IT support teams. Offline forms and backup procedures have been introduced in some districts, but technical inefficiencies continue to slow progress. The reliance on digital tools, while intended to improve accuracy, has inadvertently increased stress among field personnel.
Logistical and Administrative Strains
Logistical constraints further complicate the work of enumerators. In rural and remote areas, reaching scattered households often requires walking long distances or using unreliable transportation. Coordinators have reported that insufficient allowances for travel, mobile data, and field materials add to the burden. Administrators have promised reimbursement, but delays in payments have frustrated staff. Moreover, enumerators who are simultaneously engaged in teaching or other jobs struggle to balance multiple responsibilities. These strains highlight the need for better administrative planning and resource allocation to ensure smooth survey operations.
Government Response and Support Measures
The Karnataka State Backward Classes Commission and district officials have acknowledged the challenges faced by enumerators. Measures such as additional field staff, supervision teams, and technical support have been deployed to address concerns. District administrations are also monitoring morale and have introduced recognition programs to motivate staff. The government has assured timely payment of allowances and has requested citizen cooperation to facilitate accurate data collection. Officials stress that the survey’s success depends on both public participation and adequate support for enumerators on the ground.
Importance of the Survey for Policy Making
Despite the challenges, the Karnataka Social and Educational Survey is considered a critical tool for evidence-based policymaking. Data collected will help identify socio-economic disparities, inform welfare schemes, and guide reservation policies for various communities. Analysts stress that accurate and comprehensive participation is essential to ensure equitable outcomes. The perseverance of enumerators, even amid long hours, hostile interactions, and technical difficulties, underscores the importance of the survey as a foundation for social development and inclusive governance in Karnataka.
Field workers in rural and semi-urban areas have described their daily routines as physically exhausting, with some working from early morning until late at night to meet targets. Many have complained that the number of households assigned per day is far beyond what can be realistically covered. Several enumerators also cited logistical difficulties such as lack of transportation, poor internet connectivity for digital entry, and insufficient technical support. As the government insists on completing the task on schedule, these challenges have led to mounting frustration among survey personnel.
In addition to the demanding workload, enumerators have faced emotional strain due to resistance from certain households unwilling to share personal or caste information. Some respondents reportedly questioned the need for such data, while others expressed suspicion about its political intent. Officials say that misinformation circulating on social media about the purpose of the survey has further complicated interactions. In some areas, enumerators were verbally abused or denied entry, forcing supervisors to step in and calm tensions. Despite these difficulties, the majority have continued working diligently to ensure accurate coverage.
Teachers’ associations and government employee unions have raised concerns over the stress and fatigue faced by enumerators. They argue that the survey schedule is unrealistic given that many teachers are simultaneously handling school duties. Requests have been made to the Karnataka State Backward Classes Commission to extend the timeline or increase manpower. Some districts have provided additional rest days or allowances, but these measures remain uneven across the state. Labour advocates warn that continued pressure without proper support could impact the survey’s data quality.
Enumerators have also reported payment delays and confusion over reimbursement procedures for travel and digital equipment expenses. Several field staff claimed they had to use personal funds for transportation, stationery, and mobile data without prompt compensation. Officials have assured that payments will be processed after verification, but the delays have added to dissatisfaction. Despite repeated appeals, a comprehensive mechanism to address these grievances has yet to be implemented, prompting calls for better coordination between district administrations and the commission.
The digital nature of the current survey, though designed to improve efficiency, has presented additional hurdles. Enumerators using handheld tablets or mobile applications have encountered software glitches, difficulty saving entries, and frequent system crashes in areas with weak connectivity. Training sessions were reportedly rushed, leaving many field workers inadequately prepared to handle technical errors in real time. Supervisors have had to intervene repeatedly, slowing progress further. Some enumerators have requested offline options or simplified procedures to ease data collection.
The government, however, maintains that despite difficulties, the exercise is progressing satisfactorily. Senior officials have praised enumerators for their perseverance under challenging conditions and promised to address operational concerns promptly. They emphasize that such large-scale surveys are inherently complex and that public cooperation remains vital. The administration has also deployed additional monitoring teams to ensure accuracy and prevent tampering or duplicate entries. Yet on the ground, enumerators say their morale is declining as deadlines draw closer.
Resistance from urban respondents has been particularly pronounced. In several Bengaluru and Mysuru neighborhoods, enumerators have reported being questioned about the confidentiality of their data. Some residents refused to disclose caste details, citing privacy concerns. Others argued that caste-based surveys perpetuate outdated divisions. Officials have instructed enumerators to respond calmly and reassure citizens that information will remain confidential. Still, the repeated confrontations have made progress slow in these regions.
In contrast, rural participation has generally been better, with most households cooperating out of respect for local officials or teachers. However, even here, enumerators face logistical hardships—such as walking long distances between villages or dealing with monsoon-related disruptions. In hilly and remote regions, survey staff often travel several kilometers without transportation, sometimes crossing streams or unpaved paths to reach scattered homes. These physical challenges, combined with long working hours, have tested the endurance of many workers.
District administrations have tried to mitigate the stress by offering small incentives, such as refreshments and temporary allowances, but enumerators argue that these do not compensate for the strain. Several field workers have fallen ill or requested short breaks, forcing coordinators to reshuffle assignments. Teachers’ unions have warned that overburdening staff could disrupt regular academic schedules, especially with midterm examinations approaching in government schools. The government’s insistence on maintaining the survey timeline has left little room for flexibility.
Public misunderstanding of the survey’s purpose has also played a key role in the hostility faced by enumerators. Many citizens mistakenly believe that the data will be used for political classification rather than developmental planning. In some cases, respondents accused enumerators of bias or political alignment, leading to heated exchanges. To counter this, district information officers have launched awareness drives through local media, emphasizing that the survey’s goal is to improve welfare distribution and representation, not reinforce hierarchies.
Security concerns have surfaced in certain areas where enumerators were threatened or chased away. Police have been asked to provide protection in select localities with known tensions. While no major incidents have been reported so far, officials remain cautious. In northern districts, supervisors now accompany enumerators during late evening rounds to ensure safety. These measures, while necessary, have further slowed progress. The government has reiterated that harassment of enumerators will invite legal action under relevant public service protection laws.
Despite these hurdles, officials insist that the Karnataka Social and Educational Survey remains a crucial tool for evidence-based policymaking. The data is expected to provide insights into literacy, employment, and living standards across caste and economic groups. Analysts believe it will shape future welfare and reservation frameworks, potentially influencing political discourse in the state. However, experts caution that uneven participation or poor-quality data could undermine its reliability, underscoring the need for better working conditions for enumerators.
The Backward Classes Commission has acknowledged the field-level grievances and promised corrective steps. Chairman K. Jayaprakash Hegde recently assured that enumerators’ feedback will be incorporated into revised protocols. He also announced that special teams are being deployed to handle grievance redressal, technical troubleshooting, and cross-verification of data entries. District officials have been directed to maintain morale among field staff through recognition programs and faster processing of allowances.
As the deadline approaches, pressure continues to mount. Enumerators report working late into the night to meet targets, often sacrificing weekends and family time. Fatigue and burnout have become common, yet most remain committed to completing their duties. For many, the experience has been a test of resilience and patience, balancing civic responsibility with personal hardship. They hope the government’s acknowledgment of their efforts will translate into concrete support before the survey concludes.
Ultimately, the Karnataka Social and Educational Survey stands as both a landmark governance exercise and a reflection of the state’s administrative challenges. While its outcomes may help shape equitable policies, the process has revealed the human toll of data collection in a society still divided by suspicion and misunderstanding. Enumerators—often invisible in public discourse—have become the backbone of this initiative, bridging the gap between policy ambition and grassroots reality through sheer perseverance and duty.
Follow: Karnataka Government
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
