Calcutta Hospitals in Crisis: The West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission (WBCERC) has recently issued a significant directive that requires hospitals across the state to release the bodies of deceased patients within five hours, irrespective of whether dues, bills, or insurance claims remain unsettled.
The move was triggered by tragic incidents like that of the Hussain family, who endured nearly 15 agonizing hours of waiting before their loved one’s body was released. For families already shattered by grief, delays like these compound their suffering, adding humiliation and helplessness to loss.
On the surface, the directive feels like overdue compassion, a long-awaited acknowledgment that dignity in death is non-negotiable. But as hospital administrators and legal experts caution, the order also exposes gaps in operational frameworks, particularly around billing, insurance delays, and legal safeguards.
The “Zone of Uncertainty” in Hospitals
The phrase “zone of uncertainty”, increasingly heard in hospital corridors, goes beyond the physical delay in releasing a body. It captures the larger systemic reality where patients, families, and even healthcare staff are suspended between decisions, processes, and outcomes.
- For families, uncertainty means waiting—whether for a diagnosis, a test result, or the release of a loved one.
- For hospitals, it means being caught between compassion and compliance, humanity and finances.
- For doctors, it often means practicing in conditions where definitive answers are elusive, particularly with complex cases.
Studies in medical ethics underline how uncertainty is an intrinsic part of healthcare. The challenge lies not in eliminating it but in building structures—legal, emotional, and procedural—that make it bearable and fair.
Calcutta Hospitals in Crisis: Human Stories of Waiting
Healthcare uncertainty is not unique to Kolkata or India. Across the world, waiting is often the hardest part of care.
- In England, a 2025 survey by the Care Quality Commission revealed that nearly one in five NHS inpatients are treated in hospital corridors due to overcrowding, a phenomenon increasingly normalized but deeply distressing for patients.
- In India, overcrowding is chronic. According to a WHO health systems review, long queues, shortened consultations, and rushed communication often erode patient trust.
For families, these delays are not just logistical—they’re deeply emotional. The inability to grieve properly, uncertainty about hospital decisions, or the feeling of being “kept in the dark” can lead to trauma that outlasts illness itself.
Legal and Ethical Dilemmas
Hospitals argue that while empathy is essential, financial accountability cannot be ignored. Cases exist where families, after receiving the body, refused to settle bills, leaving hospitals with little recourse but police intervention.
Legal professionals point out that without clear enforceable mechanisms, the directive could lead to exploitation of hospitals. On the other hand, families and patient-rights advocates argue that no economic concern can outweigh the right to dignity in death.
The solution lies in balance:
- Escrow mechanisms where dues are temporarily secured before release.
- Insurance fast-track systems active even during late hours.
- Clear penalties for misuse by either families or institutions.
Global Lessons: Compassion in Policy
Globally, healthcare systems have developed models that prioritize patient dignity even within resource constraints:
- In the UK, “Martha’s Rule” empowers families to escalate care if they feel a patient’s condition is deteriorating, ensuring transparency and trust.
- In Japan, structured end-of-life care protocols combine medical, financial, and emotional support so that families don’t face bureaucratic struggles in their hardest moments.
- In some Scandinavian countries, “bereavement coordinators” are employed in hospitals to assist families immediately after a death, guiding them through paperwork, financial dues, and emotional care simultaneously.
These examples highlight how systematic frameworks can reduce uncertainty while still protecting hospitals.
A Call for Structural Reforms
The WBCERC directive is an important first step, but it cannot stand alone. To make meaningful change, hospitals, regulators, and governments must commit to:
- Transparent billing systems where families can track charges in real time.
- Digital insurance tie-ups allowing 24/7 settlement, avoiding “after-hours” deadlocks.
- Grievance redressal cells with clear escalation paths for families facing unfair delays.
- Psychosocial support units within hospitals, ensuring bereavement isn’t reduced to a financial checklist.
Research shows that patients and families respond more positively to hospitals that communicate clearly, set timelines, and explain procedures. This is not just about compassion—it also builds long-term trust in the healthcare system.
Beyond Hospitals: The Broader Meaning of Dignity
The issue of delayed body release and healthcare uncertainty reflects a larger societal challenge: how we treat those who are most vulnerable.
Dignity in death is tied to dignity in life. If families cannot expect respect, transparency, and fairness from hospitals, it erodes public confidence not just in medicine but in governance, justice, and human values.
By recognizing the “zone of uncertainty” as more than a hospital inconvenience—as a human crisis—society can begin to push for changes that balance empathy, accountability, and sustainability.
Final Reflection
The words “long due” from patients and families capture the essence of the crisis. Relief has come through WBCERC’s directive, but real resolution requires systemic reforms—not piecemeal orders.
Healthcare will always carry uncertainty. What matters is whether that uncertainty is navigated with cruel silence and delay, or with compassion and clarity.
The path forward lies in policies that protect both families and hospitals, frameworks that embrace empathy without sacrificing fairness, and leadership that sees dignity not as an optional add-on but as the core of care itself.
🔗 External references for context and further reading:
- World Health Organization – Health system review of India
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Survey – NHS inpatient experience
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
