JD(S) leader Nikhil Kumaraswamy has called upon the Karnataka government to provide urgent compensation of ₹25,000 per acre to farmers whose crops were devastated by recent heavy rains and flooding across the State. Addressing the media, he emphasized that thousands of farmers are staring at financial ruin, with paddy, ragi, sugarcane, and other crops washed away in several districts. Kumaraswamy argued that unless immediate relief is sanctioned, many families will be pushed into deep debt, sparking a rural crisis. His demand has resonated strongly in agricultural belts, where farmers are still counting their losses.
Kumaraswamy’s demand comes at a time when farmer organizations have been pressuring the government for concrete action. The JD(S) leader criticized both the Union and State governments for failing to provide timely relief despite repeated pleas. He alleged that assessment surveys conducted so far have not captured the true extent of the damage. Farmers in districts such as Mandya, Hassan, Shivamogga, and Chikkamagaluru have reported massive crop losses, with many saying they have little hope of recovering without government intervention. The ₹25,000 per acre relief, Kumaraswamy said, was the bare minimum needed to cover input costs and prevent migration to urban areas in search of work.
The ruling Congress government has maintained that it is conducting surveys to estimate the scale of damage before announcing relief packages. However, Kumaraswamy insisted that delays would only deepen farmer distress. He also demanded that relief funds be directly transferred to farmer accounts to avoid bureaucratic hurdles and corruption. Political observers believe the JD(S) is using the issue to rebuild its base among farmers, a constituency central to its identity. The demand has reignited debates on how Karnataka should strengthen its disaster response system to protect its agricultural backbone.
Farmer Distress and Political Pressure
The demand for ₹25,000 per acre highlights the larger question of how governments respond to natural disasters in an agrarian economy. Farmer groups have welcomed Kumaraswamy’s stand but warned that announcements must be backed by timely implementation. They argue that compensation often arrives too late, forcing farmers to borrow from moneylenders at high interest rates. With elections always looming large, political parties are under pressure to show solidarity with farmers. The JD(S), historically rooted in farmer politics, sees this as an opportunity to reaffirm its commitment to rural communities. For the Congress, the challenge lies in balancing fiscal limits with mounting public expectations.
Experts argue that the recurring cycle of floods and droughts in Karnataka calls for structural reforms beyond compensation. Irrigation facilities, crop insurance schemes, and scientific flood management systems have all been flagged as urgent needs. The present crisis has once again shown how fragile the farming sector remains, with even a single spell of heavy rain pushing thousands into desperation. As debates intensify, the spotlight is firmly on how the government will respond—not just with relief but with a vision to secure the future of Karnataka’s farmers.
The Road Ahead
As pressure builds, the State government faces a crucial decision: whether to meet Kumaraswamy’s demand for direct compensation or propose alternative relief measures. For farmers, the next few weeks will be decisive in determining whether they can rebuild their livelihoods or slide further into crisis. The political narrative around farmer distress is likely to dominate Karnataka’s rural landscape in the coming months. While the JD(S) sharpens its image as a farmer-first party, the Congress government must demonstrate that its promises of welfare translate into meaningful action on the ground.
Nikhil Kumaraswamy’s demand has reignited the debate around the adequacy of compensation packages typically provided to farmers during natural calamities. Historically, governments in Karnataka have announced relief amounts far below the actual costs incurred by farmers. In many cases, payments as low as ₹4,000 to ₹8,000 per acre have been sanctioned, which barely cover seed costs, let alone fertilizer, labor, and irrigation expenses. By pitching the figure at ₹25,000, Kumaraswamy is positioning the JD(S) as a party that understands the ground realities of agriculture and is willing to advocate strongly for farmer dignity and survival.
Farmer associations across Karnataka have rallied behind the demand, stating that the call for higher compensation reflects the reality of today’s agricultural economy. Farmers argue that with rising input costs—diesel, fertilizers, pesticides, and hired labor—anything less would be meaningless. They point out that floods not only destroy standing crops but also leave fields waterlogged, requiring additional expenditure to make them cultivable again. The widespread support from grassroots organizations has amplified political pressure on the ruling Congress government, which now faces a tough balancing act.
The ruling Congress, while acknowledging the plight of farmers, has so far refrained from committing to the ₹25,000 demand. Officials cite budgetary constraints, arguing that such a payout across affected districts could strain the State’s finances. The government has indicated that it will wait for damage assessment reports before making a final decision. Critics, however, argue that such delays betray insensitivity and lack of urgency. Political analysts suggest that the Congress risks losing credibility in rural Karnataka if it fails to act decisively at this moment of crisis.
The BJP, watching from the sidelines, has also used the issue to criticize the State government. Party leaders claim that the Congress has repeatedly failed to deliver timely relief and accused it of using farmer welfare as a political slogan rather than a serious commitment. While the BJP has not endorsed Kumaraswamy’s ₹25,000 demand outright, it has emphasized the need for immediate relief, signaling its intent to capitalize on the crisis to regain influence in Karnataka’s rural belts. The multi-party chorus reflects how central farmer welfare remains to the State’s politics.
In districts like Mandya and Hassan, which form the traditional heartland of the JD(S), Kumaraswamy’s demand has struck a particularly strong chord. Farmers in these regions are heavily dependent on rain-fed crops and are among the worst hit by flooding. Local JD(S) leaders are mobilizing village-level meetings to highlight the party’s farmer-first agenda, framing the ₹25,000 demand not as charity but as justice for those who keep the State’s food economy running. For the JD(S), this campaign is as much about electoral relevance as it is about farmer relief.
The plight of women farmers has also been spotlighted in this crisis. With men often migrating to cities in search of alternative work, many women are left to manage farms on their own. Floods have destroyed their crops and left them struggling to secure loans for the next season. Women’s groups have echoed Kumaraswamy’s demand, stating that fair compensation would prevent families from being forced into cycles of debt. Their voices add a social dimension to the crisis, showing how natural calamities compound existing vulnerabilities.
Agricultural experts argue that while compensation is necessary, it should be part of a larger policy shift toward sustainable farming. Karnataka has witnessed repeated cycles of drought and flooding over the past decade, but responses have largely been limited to one-time relief announcements. Experts propose a long-term approach that includes strengthening crop insurance schemes, investing in irrigation projects, and building flood-resistant infrastructure. Without such systemic changes, they warn, compensation will remain a temporary band-aid rather than a permanent solution to farmer distress.
The crisis has also exposed weaknesses in the disaster response mechanism. Farmers have complained that damage surveys conducted by officials are often inaccurate and fail to reflect ground realities. Many allege that corruption and political favoritism influence how compensation is distributed, leaving the most vulnerable farmers neglected. Kumaraswamy has demanded that surveys be conducted transparently with inputs from farmer associations, ensuring that every affected family receives fair recognition of their losses. His demand underscores the broader issue of trust between farmers and the administration.
Opposition parties are keenly aware of how farmer issues can shape electoral outcomes in Karnataka. In past elections, agrarian distress has played a decisive role in determining voter sentiment. With local body elections and national campaigns on the horizon, the Malnad and Old Mysuru regions—where farming dominates livelihoods—could swing based on how the government handles this crisis. Analysts suggest that the JD(S) is positioning itself to consolidate its base, while both the Congress and BJP scramble to align their narratives with the rural mood.
As rains continue to lash parts of the State, uncertainty hangs over Karnataka’s agricultural future. Farmers are not only seeking immediate compensation but also demanding assurance that their livelihoods will not be left at the mercy of unpredictable weather and slow government response. Nikhil Kumaraswamy’s ₹25,000 per acre demand has become a rallying cry that captures both the urgency of the current crisis and the need for systemic change. Whether the government bows to this pressure will determine not just the fate of farmers today but also the political equations of tomorrow.
The unfolding situation serves as a reminder of the deep vulnerabilities that farmers in Karnataka face, trapped between erratic weather patterns and inconsistent policy responses. While Nikhil Kumaraswamy’s demand for ₹25,000 per acre has sparked a much-needed conversation on realistic compensation, it has also laid bare the inadequacies of existing systems meant to safeguard the rural economy. For the farming community, this is more than a political debate—it is a matter of survival and dignity. The State government’s response in the coming weeks will not only decide the fate of thousands of farmers but also set the tone for Karnataka’s political and agrarian future.
Follow: Karnataka Government
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
