Washington D.C. – US President Donald Trump has reignited controversy by asserting that it would be an “insult” to America if he does not receive the Trump Nobel Peace Prize for his self-proclaimed role in resolving at least seven international conflicts. This bold declaration comes just days before the October 10 announcement of this year’s Nobel Prize winners.
Latest Gaza Peace Plan Fuels Trump Nobel Peace Prize Ambitions
Trump’s renewed push for the Trump Nobel Peace Prize follows his unveiling of a comprehensive Gaza peace plan during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent visit to the United States. If Hamas accepts this proposal, it would mark the eighth conflict the President claims to have successfully mediated since assuming office in January 2025.
While addressing top US military officers on Tuesday, Trump expressed frustration about the Nobel selection process. “Will you get the Nobel Prize? Absolutely not. They’ll give it to some guy that didn’t do a damn thing,” he stated emphatically.
The President further emphasized that the recognition should benefit the nation rather than himself personally. “It’d be a big insult to our country, I will tell you that. I don’t want it, I want the country to get it,” Trump declared, adding, “It should get it, because there’s never been anything like it.”
Seven Conflicts in Seven Months: Trump’s Peace Mediation Claims
During his recent speech, Trump reiterated his assertion of having resolved seven major wars since taking office. He elaborated on his Gaza initiative, stating that if successful, “we’ll have eight, eight in eight months. That’s pretty good.”
The conflicts Trump claims to have mediated include disputes between Israel and Iran, India and Pakistan, Rwanda and Congo, Thailand and Cambodia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Egypt and Ethiopia, and Serbia and Kosovo. Last week, while addressing the United Nations General Assembly, Trump described these as wars that “were unendable, some were going for 31 years, one was 36 years.”
Also Read: Trump Gaza Plan Ultimatum: Powerful Warning to Hamas Over 20-Point Proposal
“I ended 7 wars and in all cases they were raging with countless thousands of people being killed,” the President proclaimed, insisting he deserved the Trump Nobel Peace Prize “for each one of them.”
However, significant controversy surrounds these claims. India has repeatedly and explicitly denied Trump’s involvement in the ceasefire during Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, casting doubt on at least one of his proclaimed achievements.
The Obama Factor: Long-Standing Rivalry
Trump’s persistent pursuit of the Trump Nobel Peace Prize is partly driven by his long-standing irritation over former President Barack Obama receiving the prestigious award in 2009. This Democratic predecessor’s recognition has remained a source of frustration for Trump throughout his political career.
The comparison between the two presidents’ approaches to international diplomacy and peace-building continues to fuel political debate and media attention surrounding Trump’s current campaign for the award.
International Support and Nominations
Despite skepticism, Trump’s bid for the Trump Nobel Peace Prize has garnered substantial international backing. Several world leaders have formally nominated him for the honor, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who described the nomination as “the least we could do.”
Additional support has come from various nations including Rwanda, Gabon, Azerbaijan, and Cambodia—countries that have benefited from or participated in Trump’s claimed peace initiatives.
This widespread political support demonstrates that Trump’s campaign extends beyond mere personal ambition, reflecting genuine diplomatic relationships and international political considerations.
Expert Analysis: Zero Chance of Winning?
Despite the political nominations and Trump’s vocal campaign, experts remain highly skeptical about his chances of actually receiving the Trump Nobel Peace Prize this year. Øivind Stenersen, a respected historian who co-authored a comprehensive book on the Nobel Peace Prize, described Trump’s prospects as “completely unthinkable.”
The Norwegian Nobel Committee, responsible for awarding the annual prize, has maintained its traditional stance of independence from public campaigns and political pressure. Kristian Berg Harpviken, the committee’s secretary, acknowledged the intense media attention surrounding particular candidates.
“Of course, we do notice that there is a lot of media attention towards particular candidates,” Harpviken explained. “But that really has no impact on the discussions that are going on in the committee.”
What Happens Next?
As October 10 approaches, speculation continues about who will receive this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. While Trump’s campaign has generated significant media coverage and international discussion, the committee’s historical independence suggests that political lobbying and public relations efforts have minimal influence on their deliberations.
The Trump Nobel Peace Prize debate highlights broader questions about how peace achievements are recognized internationally and whether self-promotion affects prestigious award decisions. Whether Trump’s claimed mediations represent genuine diplomatic breakthroughs or political posturing remains a subject of international debate and scrutiny.
