New Delhi – A major political controversy has erupted as AAP accuses BJP voting irregularities, claiming that multiple party leaders cast their ballots in both Delhi and Bihar Assembly elections despite the Election Commission’s efforts to eliminate duplicate voter registrations. The allegations, made during a press conference on Thursday, have sparked intense debate about electoral integrity and raised questions about the effectiveness of the Special Intensive Revision drive conducted by the Election Commission of India.
The controversy centers around three prominent political figures who allegedly exercised their voting rights in two different states during the 2025 electoral cycle, contradicting the Election Commission’s assurance that the SIR would prevent such duplication.
AAP’s Serious Allegations Against BJP Leaders
Delhi’s Aam Aadmi Party president Saurabh Bharadwaj led the charge with specific accusations against three individuals. When AAP accuses BJP voting fraud, the party named Rajya Sabha MP Rakesh Sinha, Delhi unit’s Purvanchal Morcha president Santosh Ojha, and party functionary Nagendra Kumar as those who allegedly voted twice in different states.
Bharadwaj described the situation as “vote theft” and questioned how these leaders managed to circumvent the electoral safeguards. “The Election Commission had promised that after the SIR, no voter could remain registered in two states. Then how did these BJP leaders manage to vote again in Bihar?” he stated during the press conference.
The AAP leader emphasized the gravity of the situation by highlighting that even a state-level party president was allegedly involved in the practice. “Even the BJP’s Purvanchal Morcha president is voting in two states. Imagine the scale of vote theft that must be happening across the country,” Bharadwaj warned.
BJP’s Defense and Clarification
When AAP accuses BJP voting irregularities, the accused party members have responded with their own explanations. Rakesh Sinha took to social media platform X to defend himself against what he called “baseless and morally contested allegations.” The Rajya Sabha MP posted a video clarification stating that he had legally shifted his voter registration from Delhi to his native village Manseerpur in Begusarai district, Bihar.
“My name is only on Bihar’s electoral roll. It was earlier in Delhi’s electoral roll, and I got it deleted through a procedure established by law,” Sinha explained in his post. He accused AAP, Congress, and their allies of making false accusations and described the party leaders as “liars and morally degraded.”
The Delhi BJP unit chose not to issue an official statement on the matter, leaving individual leaders to address the allegations independently.
Evidence Presented by AAP
As AAP accuses BJP voting fraud, the party presented what it described as photographic and digital evidence to support its claims. Bharadwaj specifically cited social media posts made by the accused leaders as proof of their dual voting activities.
According to the AAP president, Santosh Ojha posted on his verified Instagram account on Thursday: “Voted today with resolve for prosperous Buxar, empowered Bihar, and developed India.” This post, combined with records showing Ojha had voted in Delhi earlier, formed the basis of the allegations against him.
The party maintained detailed records and social media screenshots to substantiate each claim, presenting them as evidence of systematic electoral manipulation.
Also Read: Mumbai BJP Chief Warning: Big Statement After Mamdani’s Historic NYC Victory 2025
Broader Implications for Electoral Integrity
The controversy surrounding how AAP accuses BJP voting practices extends beyond individual cases to raise fundamental questions about electoral reforms. Saurabh Bharadwaj characterized the situation as “a systemic subversion of democracy” and urged citizens to raise their voices peacefully through democratic and constitutional channels.
AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh added weight to the allegations by suggesting a pattern of preferential treatment. “This is the real face of Bihar’s SIR. BJP loyalists seem to have received an all-India permit to vote anywhere they want,” Singh stated, implying systematic failures in the electoral process.
Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision Drive
The Special Intensive Revision drive was implemented by the Election Commission specifically to eliminate duplicate voter registrations and ensure electoral roll accuracy. The first phase of Bihar polls took place on November 6, following the completion of this revision process.
The effectiveness of the SIR drive has now come under scrutiny as AAP accuses BJP voting irregularities that allegedly occurred despite these safeguards. The Election Commission has not yet responded to the allegations or provided clarification on how such duplication, if proven, could have occurred after the revision process.
Political Ramifications and Pending Investigation
The allegations have significant implications for both parties and the broader electoral system. As AAP accuses BJP voting fraud, the controversy adds another dimension to the already contentious political landscape in Delhi and Bihar. The timing of the AAP accuses BJP voting, coming immediately after the first phase of Bihar polling, has intensified their political impact.
The lack of response from the Election Commission in AAP accuses BJP voting fraud leaves many questions unanswered about the verification processes and the potential scale of duplicate registrations across the country. Citizens and political observers await official clarification on these serious allegations that strike at the heart of democratic integrity.
