New Delhi – A stunning Pakistan Red Fort admission has emerged from a Pakistani politician who publicly claimed Islamabad’s involvement in the devastating November 10 blast that killed multiple people in India’s capital. The explosive statement, made during a speech in the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir Assembly, has intensified diplomatic tensions and raised serious questions about state-sponsored terrorism.
Viral Video Captures Brazen Claim
In a video that has gone viral across social media platforms, the Pakistan Red Fort admission was made by Anwarul Haq, the former “Prime Minister” of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Haq boldly claimed that terror groups linked to Pakistan carried out attacks “from the Red Fort to the forests of Kashmir” as retaliation for India’s alleged actions in Balochistan.
The Pakistan Red Fort admission referenced two major terror incidents that occurred in India this year—the Pahalgam attack in April and the suicide bombing near Delhi’s historic Red Fort monument last week. Haq’s public acknowledgment of Pakistani involvement in these attacks represents an unprecedented admission of state-linked terrorism.
Details of the Inflammatory Statement
During his speech in the PoK Assembly, the Pakistan Red Fort admission included specific threats and boasts about the attacks. “I earlier said that if you keep bleeding Balochistan, we’ll hit India from Red Fort to the forests of Kashmir. By the grace of Allah, we’ve done it and they’re still unable to count bodies,” Anwarul Haq stated brazenly.
The Pakistan Red Fort admission continued with Haq adding, “Few days later, armed men entered and attacked (Delhi) and they haven’t probably counted all the bodies so far.” This callous reference to casualties demonstrates the calculated nature of the terror attacks and the lack of remorse among Pakistani political figures making such claims.
The November 10 Red Fort Attack
The Pakistan Red Fort admission relates directly to the deadly explosion that rocked India’s capital city Delhi on November 10. Investigators later determined this was a suicide attack linked to what they termed a “white collar terror module.” Ten people lost their lives and several others were injured when an explosives-laden car detonated near the iconic Red Fort monument.
Police investigation and forensic examination revealed crucial details about the attack that forms the basis of the Pakistan Red Fort admission. The car was driven by a Kashmir-origin doctor named Umar Un Nabi, whose severed leg was discovered stuck between the car’s accelerator and steering wheel. Nabi worked as an assistant professor at Al Falah University in Faridabad.
Terror Network Connections
The Pakistan Red Fort admission gains credibility when examined alongside the investigation’s findings. Delhi Police established that the deceased driver was linked to Dr Muzammil Shakeel Ganaie and Dr Adeel Rather, who were arrested in Jammu and Kashmir last week. These individuals were accused of storing over 2,900 kilograms of ammonium nitrate, along with detonators, timers, and assault rifles in Faridabad.
Investigators have concluded that the attack referenced in the Pakistan Red Fort admission was orchestrated by a larger “white-collar terror module” linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). This extremist group, based in Pakistan and founded by Masood Azhar—a UN-designated terrorist—has been responsible for numerous attacks on Indian soil over the years.
Balochistan Allegations as Justification
The Pakistan Red Fort admission was framed by Anwarul Haq as retaliation for India’s alleged actions in Balochistan province. Pakistan has long accused India of fueling unrest in Balochistan, a charge that New Delhi consistently dismisses as an attempt to deflect attention from Islamabad’s own support for cross-border terrorism.
India has categorically and consistently denied any involvement in violence in Balochistan province. The Pakistani establishment’s repeated accusations are viewed by Indian officials as a smokescreen designed to justify their continued support for terror groups operating against India while portraying themselves as victims.
Pakistan Defence Minister’s War Warning
The Pakistan Red Fort admission comes amid increasingly aggressive rhetoric from Pakistani military leadership. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif issued a stark warning that Islamabad cannot ignore the possibility of an “all-out war” with India and that the country needs to be on “full alert.”
Asif stated that India cannot be trusted, adding that Pakistan has been put on maximum alert for “any border incursion.” His statement accompanied the Pakistan Red Fort admission, suggesting a coordinated messaging strategy from Pakistani political and military establishments.
“We cannot ignore (India) in any way… We are not ignoring India, and our preparation and alert are at maximum. We cannot trust India in any way. We cannot rule out (attack) as India can directly intervene. It can continue attacks from there (presumably Afghanistan) and it can go for an all-out war as per its strategy,” Khawaja Asif stated in a television interview.
International Implications
The Pakistan Red Fort admission carries significant international implications for Pakistan’s global standing. Such public acknowledgment of involvement in terror attacks could potentially impact Pakistan’s relationships with Western nations and international financial institutions. The country already faces scrutiny from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) regarding terror financing concerns.
The brazen nature of the Pakistan Red Fort admission also complicates diplomatic efforts and peace initiatives in the region. When political leaders publicly celebrate terror attacks that kill civilians, it becomes increasingly difficult for moderate voices on both sides to advocate for dialogue and de-escalation.
India’s Position on Cross-Border Terrorism
India has consistently maintained that Pakistan provides safe haven, training, and material support to terrorist organizations that target Indian interests. The Pakistan Red Fort admission essentially validates India’s long-standing position that elements within Pakistan’s political and military establishment actively support and encourage terrorism against India.
New Delhi has repeatedly called upon the international community to hold Pakistan accountable for its role in sponsoring and harboring terrorist organizations. The Pakistan Red Fort admission provides additional evidence supporting India’s claims and may strengthen its case in international forums.
Historical Pattern of Denial and Admission
While the Pakistan Red Fort admission is particularly brazen, it follows a historical pattern where Pakistani officials and politicians occasionally admit to actions that the state officially denies. These admissions typically occur in domestic political contexts where such rhetoric is seen as demonstrating strength or defending national honor.
However, when confronted internationally, Pakistan typically denies state involvement in terrorism and characterizes such incidents as actions by non-state actors operating independently. The Pakistan Red Fort admission challenges this narrative by showing a former senior political figure openly celebrating state-linked terror attacks.
Security Concerns and Future Threats
The Pakistan Red Fort admission raises serious concerns about future security threats to India. If Pakistani political figures feel emboldened to publicly claim responsibility for terror attacks, it suggests a level of confidence in their ability to continue such operations without facing significant international consequences.
Indian security agencies must now assess whether the Pakistan Red Fort admission indicates planning for additional attacks or whether it represents political posturing by PoK politicians seeking to demonstrate their relevance. Either way, the statement necessitates heightened vigilance and enhanced security measures across vulnerable targets in India.
The Pakistan Red Fort admission serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges India faces from state-sponsored terrorism and the complex dynamics of South Asian geopolitics.
