Trinamool Congress Faces Internal Turmoil: A major political confrontation has erupted inside the Trinamool Congress (TMC) at the Siliguri Municipal Corporation (SMC), triggering deep internal tension within the ruling party. The dispute centers around Dilip Barman, the councillor of Ward 46 and a member of the Mayor-in-Council (MMIC), who stands accused by fellow party councillors of repeatedly attacking the Mayor, Gautam Deb, and Deputy Mayor, Ranjan Sarkar. His remarks, delivered publicly and often sharply, have pushed the civic body into a phase of serious intra-party turbulence. The recent collective resolution by the majority councillors to escalate the matter to the TMC’s state leadership signifies the gravity of the crisis.
Trinamool Congress Faces Internal Turmoil: The Triggering Incident
The current flashpoint emerged after officials from the SMC’s building department — accompanied by police personnel — arrived in Ward 46 to demolish an illegal structure. According to officials, the operation was part of routine compliance under urban development norms and the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993. Barman, however, allegedly opposed the demolition operation and publicly blamed the Mayor and Deputy Mayor for “targeting” his ward or “mismanaging” civic affairs. His statements quickly escalated into a public controversy, drawing sharp criticism from fellow TMC councillors who described them as unverified and damaging to the administration.
Background of the Tension
The November incident is not an isolated case but part of a series of confrontations dating back several months. Barman has repeatedly accused the civic leadership of neglecting his ward, ignoring illegal construction concerns, and allegedly failing to respond to genuine public complaints. Earlier this year, during a monthly board meeting, he had raised similar issues and exchanged heated words with the leadership. These frequent confrontations have only intensified over time, culminating in the current face-off.
Councillors Unite Against Barman
Earlier this week, 36 out of 37 TMC councillors at the Siliguri Municipal Corporation convened an internal meeting and adopted a unanimous resolution against Barman’s conduct. The councillors termed his consistent public outbursts “unjustified,” “harmful,” and “contradictory to party discipline.” They announced that the entire matter would be formally submitted to the TMC state leadership for corrective action. This unified stance suggests the rare occurrence of almost absolute consensus within a political body, underscoring the seriousness with which the party views the matter.
Formal Condemnation by Senior Councillors
Prominent councillors including Sanjay Sharma and Ranjan Shil Sharma addressed the media, stating that Barman’s allegations were “baseless” and “lacking evidence.” They emphasized that if Barman had proof of corruption or mismanagement, he should have submitted it through proper administrative and legal channels. Evangelizing grievances through the public domain, they argued, only weakens the trust people place in municipal governance.
Mayor and Deputy Mayor Respond
Mayor Gautam Deb and Deputy Mayor Ranjan Sarkar have so far maintained a restrained response to the controversy. Both leaders claimed that the demolition drive was part of the civic body’s regular enforcement activity. They reiterated that the corporation is committed to transparent governance and follows due legal procedures before demolishing any unauthorized construction. Their remarks align with established municipal norms under state government rules.
TMC’s Past Action: Show-Cause Notice
The party has disciplined Barman in the past. Earlier this year, the TMC’s state president had issued him a show-cause notice for violating party discipline. The notice alleged that Barman’s public comments were inappropriate and harmful to the party’s public image. He was given an opportunity to explain his conduct, a move consistent with internal disciplinary procedure often used in political organizations to maintain control and cohesion.
Barman’s Defense and Claims
Despite facing criticism from fellow councillors and the party leadership, Dilip Barman remains steadfast in his stance. He asserts that his statements reflect genuine concerns affecting Ward 46. He claims he has been working tirelessly for his constituents and that the municipal leadership has ignored repeated pleas for intervention. Barman argues that his criticism is not political but administrative, insisting that his objective is solely to improve the living conditions of residents.
The Identity Factor
Barman has also brought identity politics into the discourse, stating that he belongs to the Rajbanshi community, a prominent ethnic group in North Bengal, and that his views are often ignored due to internal biases. While no official within TMC has acknowledged such claims, his statements point to the possible emergence of ethnic representation becoming entangled with civic administration debates — an issue that can alter local political dynamics if it gains traction.
Paragraph 10 — Governance vs. Politics
The dispute highlights a crucial friction point between governance and politics. While Barman insists his claims highlight genuine administrative issues, the majority councillors argue that public dissent damages public trust and disrupts development work. The civic leadership must balance between accommodating dissent and ensuring cohesive functioning of the municipal corporation.
Paragraph 11 — Implications for Civic Administration
Internal conflicts within a ruling party often impact public services. If the dispute remains unresolved, key administrative decisions — such as issuing permits, approving ward budgets, undertaking infrastructure work, and coordinating inter-departmental tasks — may experience delays. Civic bodies rely heavily on cooperation between councillors and municipal officers, and persistent conflict can slow down policy execution.
Political Reputation at Stake
For the Trinamool Congress, which positions itself as a development-oriented party, such internal disputes could erode public perception. At a time when the party is focused on maintaining dominance in North Bengal, adversarial exchanges within the civic body may be perceived as a sign of organizational instability.
Reaction From Party Base
Grassroots supporters often form the backbone of political parties in regions like Siliguri. Observers note that the conflict has caused unrest among the party’s local workers. Some support Barman’s claims of administrative neglect, while others believe such disputes should remain internal and not be aired through public statements.
Residents of Ward 46 Speak Out
Residents of Ward 46 are closely watching the evolving situation. Many local citizens confirm that several civic issues — including garbage collection, drainage, and unauthorized constructions — remain unresolved. Whether these issues stem from internal disputes, administrative inefficiency, or miscommunication remains unclear, but the public sentiment leans toward demanding quicker resolution.
Development Work in Siliguri
Despite ongoing tension, the SMC claims that development work continues across several wards. Road repair, street lighting installations, water supply upgrades, and sanitation improvements are ongoing, according to civic officials. Their statements reflect the corporation’s effort to insulate administrative work from political disagreements.
What Government Rules Say About Civic Conduct
Municipal councillors in West Bengal operate under the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993, which outlines their duties, responsibilities, and behavioral expectations. While criticism is not prohibited, persistent public allegations against colleagues may be considered misconduct under party rules — particularly if they impact governance.
Official Government Link:
West Bengal Municipal Act (via WB Government portal)
https://www.wb.gov.in
Role of the State Leadership
The dispute now awaits a decision from the TMC’s state leadership. In the past, the party has taken strict steps against intra-party confrontations to maintain unity. The current situation offers the leadership another test to reinforce discipline while allowing internal grievances to be expressed constructively.
Expected Outcomes
Political analysts suggest several possible outcomes:
-
Reconciliation Effort:
The leadership may initiate a dialogue between Barman and the city’s top civic leaders, seeking compromise. -
Reprimand or Disciplinary Action:
The party may issue a fresh notice or reduce Barman’s role within the MMIC. -
Reorganization of Civic Responsibilities:
Some responsibilities may be redistributed to prevent administrative gridlock. -
Defection or Rebellion:
If tensions are not managed, Barman may consider distancing himself from the party, though this remains speculative.
Administrative Transparency and Accountability
The situation has reignited debate on civic transparency. Citizens have called for the SMC to publish actionable timelines, audit reports, and project updates on its official website to ensure residents remain informed.
Official Civic Link:
Siliguri Municipal Corporation (SMC):
https://www.siligurismc.in
The Role of Police and Enforcement Proceedings
The presence of police during demolition activities follows standard guidelines issued by the Home Department, Government of West Bengal. Police assistance is mandated to prevent law and order issues during administrative actions.
Official Link:
West Bengal Home Department
https://home.wb.gov.in
The Political Importance of Siliguri
Siliguri is strategically significant due to its demographic diversity, economic role, and geographic position. Political leadership in the city often affects TMC’s broader image in North Bengal. Thus, the internal conflict has implications for larger regional political dynamics.
Past Instances of Civic Disputes
Civic disputes within political parties are not new in urban local bodies. Across the country, such disagreements have occurred in various states, prompting government-level directives to maintain discipline. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has repeatedly emphasized cooperative governance.
Official Link:
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs
https://mohua.gov.in
Local Law Experts’ View
Law experts say that unless Barman can substantiate his allegations with evidence, his statements may be considered politically motivated rather than administrative. However, they also argue that genuine dissent within councils must not be suppressed but addressed through systematic dialogue.
Public Expectations from Civic Leaders
Residents expect councillors to uphold unity, ensure smooth delivery of services, and avoid confrontation that hampers development work. For them, political stability translates directly to availability of basic public amenities.
Possible Ripple Effect
If the issue escalates further, other civic bodies in West Bengal may observe ripple effects — either through stricter discipline or heightened political caution among councillors.
Governance Challenges Ahead
Going forward, the SMC faces the challenge of balancing political harmony with administrative efficiency. Whether the leadership can manage dissent while maintaining development momentum remains to be seen.
What Happens Next?
The TMC state leadership is expected to summon both sides for a detailed discussion. Once the report submitted by the 36 councillors is reviewed, the party will decide the next course of action. Such actions may include warnings, reassignment of roles, mediation, or disciplinary measures.
Citizens Await Resolution
With civic services directly tied to councillor participation, the public clearly hopes for a quick resolution. A prolonged dispute may lead to unease among residents already facing local issues.
The Broader Political Message
For political observers, the dispute sends a message that internal discipline remains a pressing concern for the TMC. How the party responds will be closely watched, particularly with upcoming electoral cycles.
Conclusion
The unfolding conflict between Dilip Barman and the leadership of the Siliguri Municipal Corporation represents more than an isolated civic dispute. It symbolizes the delicate balance between administrative governance, political loyalty, community representation, and personal expression. As the party prepares to address the concerns raised by both sides, the outcome will shape not only the future of SMC’s governance but also the political narrative of the region. With residents, councillors, administrators, and the party’s state leadership now deeply invested, the coming weeks will determine whether the dispute becomes a catalyst for internal reform or a sign of deeper fractures.
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
