The first day of the Karnataka Legislature’s winter session in Belagavi began under heightened tension as activists from the Maharashtra Ekikaran Samiti (MES) and Karnataka Rakshana Vedike (KRV) launched simultaneous protests across the city. The long-standing border dispute between Karnataka and Maharashtra once again resurfaced, pulling crowds into the streets and prompting a heavy deployment of police personnel. Authorities detained dozens of protesters from both organisations as demonstrations escalated near sensitive locations. Despite planned legislative proceedings, the political atmosphere was overshadowed by the visible unrest and competing regional sentiments that define the winter session every year.
MES members began their agitation early in the morning, gathering near Tilakwadi, Shahapur, and other strongholds traditionally aligned with their cause. Clad in black ribbons and carrying placards demanding the merger of Belagavi with Maharashtra, activists accused the Karnataka government of neglecting Marathi-speaking communities. Their protest was symbolic but intense, echoing decades of demands and political frustration. Police intervention came swiftly as crowds grew denser, forcing officers to disperse groups and prevent them from approaching the Suvarna Vidhana Soudha, where the winter session was scheduled to begin amid tight security.
Meanwhile, KRV activists organised their demonstration in opposition to MES’s claims, asserting that Belagavi is an inseparable part of Karnataka. Their protest was characterised by loud slogans, Kannada flags, and speeches that emphasised linguistic pride and territorial unity. The KRV argued that the border dispute is politically motivated and urged the state government to adopt a firm stance against attempts to challenge Karnataka’s sovereignty. As groups from both sides mobilised across different parts of the city, police had to navigate a challenging situation, ensuring that rival protesters did not converge and escalate tensions.
Rival Movements, Heightened Identity Politics
According to police officials, the decision to detain activists from both MES and KRV was necessary to maintain public order. Security personnel, including reserve forces, were deployed across Belagavi to prevent any untoward incidents. Officers stated that while peaceful protest is permitted during the winter session, attempts to disrupt proceedings or approach restricted areas cannot be allowed. Many activists were taken into preventive custody and moved to local police stations. The detentions, though expected, added fuel to the narrative of political suppression raised by each group as they addressed their followers throughout the day.
The protests reflect deeper identity tensions that have shaped the Belagavi region for decades. MES supporters accuse Karnataka of cultural marginalisation, claiming that administration, education, and public communication discriminate against Marathi speakers. They argue that the region’s linguistic roots extend into Maharashtra, and therefore Belagavi should rightfully be merged with it. On the other hand, Kannada groups strongly contest this narrative, pointing to demographic shifts, administrative integration, and the historical context that affirms Belagavi’s placement within Karnataka. The winter session, conducted annually in Belagavi, often becomes a focal point for these competing claims.
Karnataka government officials reiterated that the state will not compromise on its territorial integrity. Ministers addressing the media emphasised that the border dispute is long settled constitutionally and administratively. They criticised MES for repeatedly stirring unrest during the winter session, accusing the organisation of politicising linguistic identity for regional gain. The government further stated that maintaining law and order is its top priority and pledged not to tolerate disruptions to legislative business. By afternoon, multiple checkpoints had been reinforced, and police presence was intensified along arterial routes leading to the Suvarna Vidhana Soudha.
The Maharashtra Ekikaran Samiti, however, dismissed the government’s remarks, calling them an attempt to silence legitimate democratic expression. MES leaders argued that their demand for merger stems from genuine cultural and linguistic concerns and that detaining activists only strengthens their resolve. They claimed Marathi speakers in Belagavi continue to face administrative and educational hardships, including limited access to Marathi-medium schooling and alleged bias in local governance. Their protest, they insisted, was peaceful, and the detentions were motivated by political fear rather than public safety.
For the Karnataka Rakshana Vedike, the situation was equally charged. KRV leaders accused MES of provoking unrest and attempting to destabilise the winter session. They maintained that Kannada identity and administrative continuity must be protected without concession. According to KRV members, Belagavi’s integration into Karnataka is non-negotiable and backed by cultural, administrative, and demographic realities. They urged the government to act decisively against groups challenging state boundaries. KRV’s demonstration, though equally forceful, focused on countering what they call a “misleading narrative” propagated by MES.
Political Reactions, Legislative Agenda Overshadowed
Political reactions poured in throughout the day as parties issued statements aligning with their respective positions. Congress leaders described the protests as a reminder of deep-seated regional anxieties that require sensitive handling, though they criticised both sides for escalating tensions. BJP representatives accused the Congress-led state government of failing to anticipate the intensity of the protests, blaming administrative lapses for the detentions and street unrest. Regional party leaders urged focus on development issues, arguing that recurring border disputes distract from infrastructure, employment, and social concerns in the Belagavi region.
Inside the Suvarna Vidhana Soudha, the winter session commenced as scheduled, but the atmosphere was thick with awareness of the disturbances outside. Security was exceptionally tight, preventing unauthorised access and regulating movement even for government staff. Legislators acknowledged the protests during informal discussions, hinting at the need for structured dialogue rather than annual cycles of agitation. The legislative agenda for the day included debates on rural development, irrigation projects, and healthcare concerns, but much of the public attention remained fixed on the civil unrest unfolding beyond the compound.
Legal experts observing the developments noted that the border dispute falls under the constitutional jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which has continued reviewing submissions from both Karnataka and Maharashtra. They emphasised that street protests cannot alter legal boundaries but acknowledged that such demonstrations reflect genuine public sentiment that governments must address. According to experts, handling such disputes requires a combination of legal clarity, administrative fairness, and cultural sensitivity. They also underlined the importance of ensuring that citizens from both linguistic communities feel protected and represented within existing state frameworks.
As detentions continued through the day, families of several activists gathered outside police stations demanding their release. Supporters accused authorities of selectively targeting their group while allowing the rival organisation more freedom — a claim repeated by both MES and KRV depending on the situation. Police denied any bias, stating that detentions were strictly preventive and applied uniformly. Officers insisted that no excessive force was used and that detainees would be released once tensions eased. Nonetheless, the steady movement of police vehicles carrying activists drew considerable attention from residents across Belagavi.
Citizens living near protest sites expressed concern over the recurring pattern of unrest during the winter session. Many said they sympathised with linguistic issues but were frustrated by disruptions to daily life, traffic congestion, and heightened police presence. Business owners in areas like Khade Bazar and College Road reported reduced customer footfall as people avoided crowded locations. Some residents argued that both MES and KRV must find non-disruptive ways to express their concerns, while others felt that protests remain an essential tool when governments fail to address longstanding grievances.
Political analysts observed that the winter session in Belagavi consistently becomes a stage for symbolic political performance. The location of the session itself — chosen to underline Karnataka’s claim over the region — triggers predictable responses from organisations on either side of the linguistic divide. According to analysts, the protests have become part of a cyclical pattern where neither side concedes ground and both marshal public emotion to reinforce their identity narratives. This cycle, they argue, continues because successive governments have not invested enough in cultural integration and community dialogue.
In the evening, MES and KRV leaders held separate press briefings, each accusing the other of provocation and misinformation. MES representatives reiterated their commitment to pursuing constitutional avenues for merger while condemning the detentions as undemocratic. KRV leaders countered that their protest was essential to defending Karnataka’s unity and demanded stricter action against MES. Both groups vowed to continue their agitations in the coming days, setting the stage for further activity outside the legislative complex as the winter session progresses.
As night approached, the police continued patrolling sensitive areas and monitoring social media channels for signs of mobilisation. Officers appealed to the public to remain calm and avoid sensational rumours. They confirmed that most detained activists would be released after routine documentation, provided there were no violations. Authorities also announced temporary traffic diversions for the remaining days of the session. Despite the day’s turbulence, no major incidents of violence were reported, a fact that officials attributed to timely preventive measures and controlled handling of demonstrations.
By the end of the day, the first session of the winter proceedings concluded without interruption, but the events outside the Suvarna Vidhana Soudha left a strong impression on both lawmakers and citizens. The protests once again highlighted the enduring emotional weight of the Belagavi dispute and the passion of groups that seek recognition for their linguistic identity. Whether the ongoing winter session will address these concerns meaningfully remains uncertain. For now, the symbolic battle between MES and KRV has reaffirmed how deeply cultural and territorial questions continue to shape political life in northern Karnataka.
As Belagavi braces for the remaining days of the winter session, authorities remain on high alert. The government has assured that it will allow peaceful democratic expression but will not compromise on law and order. For MES and KRV supporters, the first day’s events have set a charged tone; for residents, the hope is for minimal disruption; for political leaders, the challenge lies in acknowledging public sentiment without inflaming tensions. The winter session, once again, has begun not just as a legislative exercise but as a reminder of the region’s complex cultural and political landscape.
Follow: Karnataka Government
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
