Advances in medical technology have made it increasingly difficult for authorities to crack down on illegal sex determination, Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao has said, warning that enforcement mechanisms are struggling to keep pace with rapidly evolving diagnostic tools. Speaking on the challenges faced in implementing the law against sex-selective practices, the Minister said that while the legal framework remains strong, technological sophistication has introduced new layers of complexity that demand constant vigilance, updated strategies, and stronger institutional coordination.
Sex determination and sex-selective abortions are prohibited under the law, aimed at protecting the girl child and correcting skewed sex ratios. However, the Minister said that offenders are exploiting technological loopholes, portable devices, and covert networks to bypass detection. Unlike earlier decades, when ultrasound machines were relatively easy to track and regulate, newer technologies are smaller, more mobile, and harder to monitor, making enforcement a moving target.
Despite repeated assurances from successive governments, public health experts caution that the gap between policy intent and ground-level outcomes remains wide. They argue that while Karnataka has taken steps to strengthen inspections and monitoring, enforcement often depends on local administrative will and political backing. In districts where officials proactively pursue violations, deterrence is visible, but in others, lax oversight allows illegal practices to resurface quietly. This unevenness, experts say, undermines the overall impact of the law and allows offenders to shift operations geographically rather than abandon them altogether.
Women’s rights groups have also pointed out that the burden of enforcement disproportionately falls on pregnant women rather than on the networks that facilitate sex detection. In several instances, women have faced questioning and social stigma, while middlemen and unethical service providers remain insulated. Activists argue that fear of harassment discourages women from seeking legitimate prenatal care, inadvertently pushing them towards informal systems where regulation is weakest. They stress that enforcement must be sensitive, rights-based, and focused on dismantling supply chains rather than penalising vulnerable individuals.
The Minister acknowledged concerns about misuse of authority and said the government is working to ensure that enforcement does not become oppressive. He said clear guidelines are being reinforced to prevent harassment of expectant mothers and ethical practitioners. Training programmes, he added, are being planned to sensitise officials to the gender and ethical dimensions of the issue, ensuring that legal action targets deliberate violations rather than creating fear around pregnancy-related healthcare.
Data trends continue to be a critical indicator for policymakers. Demographers note that while Karnataka’s overall sex ratio has shown gradual improvement over decades, child sex ratio figures in certain pockets remain worrying. These localised distortions suggest the persistence of sex-selective practices, even if they are not immediately visible. Officials concede that such trends often emerge years after violations occur, making retrospective enforcement difficult and underscoring the importance of preventive measures.
There is also growing concern about the role of informal counselling networks that influence family decisions long before medical intervention occurs. Social workers say pressure from extended families, coupled with misinformation about economic burdens, pushes couples towards sex selection. In this context, technology is only one link in a longer chain of discrimination. Addressing these pressures, they argue, requires community-level engagement, economic support for families with girl children, and visible success stories that challenge traditional assumptions.
Concluding his remarks, the Health Minister reiterated that the State’s approach must remain dynamic. He said complacency would only embolden violators who constantly adapt to new tools and loopholes. The fight against illegal sex detection, he said, must combine law enforcement, ethical medical practice, social reform, and sustained public dialogue. Only when technological oversight and societal values move in tandem, he added, can the cycle of discrimination be meaningfully broken and the promise of gender justice upheld.
The Minister emphasised that the issue is not merely technological but deeply social. He said the persistent demand for sex determination reflects entrenched patriarchal attitudes and economic anxieties, particularly around inheritance and social status. Technology, he noted, has simply become a tool that enables these biases to manifest in more concealed and sophisticated ways. As long as the social preference for male children exists, enforcement alone will remain an uphill task.
Karnataka, like several other States, has made significant efforts to improve its sex ratio over the years through awareness campaigns, inspections, and legal action. Yet, the Minister acknowledged that progress has been uneven. In some regions, improvements have plateaued, while in others, subtle declines raise concerns about the resurgence of covert practices. He said these trends underscore the need for renewed focus and innovation in both policy and implementation.
Officials from the Health Department said that enforcement teams now face challenges in tracing digital records, informal referrals, and cross-border networks that facilitate illegal sex detection. Many violations no longer occur in fixed clinics but through loosely connected systems that operate intermittently, making them difficult to pin down. This fragmentation, they said, allows offenders to evade scrutiny and complicates evidence gathering.
Evolving Technology, Enforcement Gaps, and Institutional Strain
The Health Minister pointed out that regulatory systems were originally designed for a different technological era. Laws governing prenatal diagnostic techniques focus heavily on physical equipment and registered facilities. While these remain important, the emergence of handheld diagnostic devices, tele-consultations, and data-sharing platforms has created grey zones that are harder to regulate using traditional methods.
Enforcement officers say that inspections now require a higher level of technical expertise. Identifying misuse often involves analysing digital footprints, financial transactions, and informal referral patterns rather than simply sealing machines or inspecting clinic registers. This has placed additional pressure on district-level authorities, who may lack specialised training or resources to keep up with such complexities.
The Minister acknowledged that frontline officers often operate under intense pressure, balancing enforcement with routine public health responsibilities. He said that while the law mandates strict action, effective implementation requires sustained investment in training, technology, and manpower. Without these, enforcement risks becoming symbolic rather than substantive.
There is also the challenge of legal thresholds. Prosecuting cases of illegal sex determination requires strong evidence, and courts demand high standards of proof. As practices become more discreet, gathering admissible evidence becomes harder, leading to fewer convictions despite widespread suspicion of violations. The Minister said this gap between detection and prosecution weakens deterrence.
Health activists argue that this has led to a sense of impunity among offenders. While raids and inspections continue, the low rate of successful prosecution sends mixed signals. The Minister agreed that enforcement must be both visible and effective, stressing that sporadic action is insufficient to address a deeply entrenched problem.
Another concern raised by officials is the misuse of legitimate medical services. Advanced diagnostic tools play a crucial role in maternal and fetal health, and excessive restrictions risk hampering genuine medical care. The Minister said striking a balance between regulation and access is critical, as overregulation could discourage ethical practitioners and harm patient trust.
Social Mindsets, Accountability, and the Way Forward
Beyond technology and enforcement, the Minister stressed the importance of addressing the social roots of sex selection. He said that laws can prevent access, but they cannot change mindsets on their own. Persistent gender bias, economic insecurity, and social pressure continue to drive demand for male children, particularly in certain communities.
Public awareness campaigns, he said, must evolve alongside technology. Traditional messaging may no longer be sufficient to counter modern forms of discrimination. Campaigns need to engage families, schools, and community leaders in sustained dialogue about gender equality, rather than relying solely on fear of legal consequences.
The Minister also called for greater accountability within the medical community. While the majority of doctors adhere to ethical standards, a small number of violators tarnish the profession and undermine public trust. Strengthening professional self-regulation, he said, could complement government enforcement and help identify violations early.
Inter-departmental coordination was highlighted as another priority. The Health Department alone cannot address the issue, the Minister said, pointing to the need for collaboration with law enforcement, women and child welfare departments, and local administrations. Sharing data and intelligence across departments could improve detection and response.
Experts have also suggested leveraging technology itself as part of the solution. Digital tracking of diagnostic equipment, data analytics to identify suspicious patterns, and anonymous reporting mechanisms could help authorities stay ahead of offenders. The Minister said such measures are under consideration but cautioned that they require careful design to protect privacy and prevent misuse.
Civil society organisations working on gender issues emphasised that progress must be measured not just by enforcement statistics but by lived realities. They said improvements in sex ratios, education levels of girls, and women’s economic participation are interconnected indicators of change. Without broader social transformation, enforcement gains may remain fragile.
The Minister acknowledged that the fight against sex detection is a long-term struggle requiring persistence and adaptability. He said that complacency would be dangerous, especially as technology continues to evolve. Continuous review of laws, procedures, and strategies is essential to ensure relevance and effectiveness.
As Karnataka grapples with these challenges, the debate highlights a sobering reality. Technology, while a force for medical progress, can also be misused in ways that deepen social inequities. The responsibility of the State, the Minister said, is to ensure that innovation serves life and dignity, not discrimination.
In the end, the issue goes beyond devices and diagnostics. It is about the value society places on daughters and the willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about gender bias. As enforcement struggles to keep pace with technology, the real test lies in whether social conscience can evolve faster than the tools used to undermine it.
Follow: Karnataka Government
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
