New Delhi – A Delhi court has issued significant orders regarding the CM testimony assault case, directing that Chief Minister Rekha Gupta‘s statements be recorded privately in “in-camera” proceedings. This decision aims to prevent overcrowding and protect the privacy of the high-profile public figure while ensuring justice in the August attack case.
Court Orders Private Testimony Recording
Additional Sessions Judge Ekta Gauba Mann of Tis Hazari Courts passed directions on Friday regarding the CM testimony assault case, ordering that the chief minister’s statements be recorded in private proceedings. The decision recognizes Gupta’s status as a public figure and addresses concerns about potential overcrowding and privacy breaches during court proceedings.
The court’s order in the CM testimony assault case came after special public prosecutor Pradeep Rana filed a plea requesting that CM Gupta be called at 2pm for her “in-camera” testimony. This timing was specifically chosen to minimize disruptions and ensure a controlled environment for the sensitive proceedings.
Importantly, the accused’s counsel did not oppose the plea for private proceedings in the CM testimony assault case, indicating agreement on the need for special arrangements given the high-profile nature of the incident and the witness.
Understanding In-Camera Proceedings
In the context of the CM testimony assault case, “in-camera proceedings” refer to court sessions held privately with the bench, specifically excluding the public and the press. This legal mechanism ensures that sensitive testimony can be recorded without external pressures or disruptions that might occur in open court settings.
Such proceedings are typically reserved for cases involving public figures, sensitive information, or situations where privacy concerns outweigh the general principle of open court proceedings. The CM testimony assault case clearly meets these criteria given the chief minister’s prominent position.
Formal Charges Framed Against Accused
Beyond the procedural orders for recording testimony, the court also formally framed charges in the CM testimony assault case against two individuals: Sakriya Rajeshbhai Khimjibhai and co-accused Tehseen Raza. This represents a significant step forward in the legal proceedings against those allegedly responsible for the attack.
The charges framed in the CM testimony assault case include attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy, reflecting the serious nature of the August 20 incident and the potential consequences faced by the accused if convicted.
Also Read: Atal Canteens Delhi Launch: Revolutionary Rs. 5 Meals for Urban Poor
Details of the August Attack
The CM testimony assault case stems from an incident on August 20, when Chief Minister Rekha Gupta was attacked while attending a weekly public hearing meeting at her camp office in Civil Lines. The attack occurred during a routine engagement where the chief minister meets with constituents to hear their grievances and concerns.
Rajeshbhai, an auto driver from Rajkot in Gujarat, allegedly posed as a complainant seeking to present issues at the public hearing. Using this deception, he gained entry to the venue where the CM testimony assault case would later originate.
However, security personnel overpowered Rajeshbhai before he could cause serious harm, and he was immediately taken into custody. This swift action by security forces prevented what could have been a far more tragic outcome.
Court’s Assessment of Criminal Intent
In earlier proceedings related to the CM testimony assault case, the Delhi court had framed charges of attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy against both accused, providing detailed reasoning for these serious charges.
The court stated that Rajeshbhai managed to break into the security ring of the chief minister and attacked her, demonstrating calculated planning. “This prima facie shows that the accused Rajesh has come in a very calculated and well-prepared manner to attack the victim with an intention to kill,” the court observed in the CM testimony assault case.
This assessment suggests the court views the incident not as a spontaneous act but as a premeditated attack with potentially lethal intent.
Co-Accused’s Role in Conspiracy
The CM testimony assault case extends beyond the primary attacker to include co-accused Tahseen Raza, who faces charges of conspiring with Rajeshbhai and providing financial assistance for the attack. According to prosecutors, Raza gave Rajeshbhai money to travel to the Capital to carry out the assault.
The court framed criminal charges against Raza in the CM testimony assault case after rejecting his plea for discharge. The court determined that Raza had hatched the conspiracy in secrecy, making him liable for prosecution for the same offences as the primary attacker.
Rejection of Discharge Plea
Raza’s attempt to secure discharge from the CM testimony assault case was unsuccessful, with the court finding sufficient evidence of his involvement in the conspiracy. The secretive nature of the planning and his alleged financial contribution to facilitate Rajeshbhai’s travel to Delhi formed the basis for continuing prosecution.
Significance of Privacy Protection
The decision to conduct the CM testimony assault case proceedings in-camera reflects judicial recognition of the unique challenges faced by public figures serving as witnesses. Overcrowding in courtrooms can create security concerns, compromise the dignity of proceedings, and potentially influence testimony through external pressure.
By ordering private proceedings for the CM testimony assault case, the court balances the need for justice with practical considerations of security, privacy, and the efficient administration of justice. This approach allows Chief Minister Gupta to provide her testimony in a controlled environment where she can speak freely about the traumatic incident without concerns about public spectacle or potential security risks from supporters or opponents gathering outside the courtroom.
