The Abhishek Banerjee Accuses EC of Selective Leaks in Bengal SIR 2025 controversy has become a defining moment in India’s democratic process. On November 28, 2025, Trinamool Congress (TMC) national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee accused the Election Commission of India (ECI) of planting “selective leaks” during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal. He demanded the release of full CCTV footage and all evidence linked to the exercise, alleging that the EC was hiding behind curated information.

2. The Special Intensive Revision (SIR): What It Means

The SIR is a voter roll update exercise mandated by the ECI.

• BLOs must verify voter identities against the 2002 electoral roll benchmark.
• Families without proper linkage risk exclusion.
• Aadhaar is accepted only as identity proof, not citizenship proof.
• Normally, the process takes 18–24 months.
• In 2025, the EC compressed it into two months, sparking chaos.

This hurried timeline has become the root of the crisis, with BLOs collapsing under workload pressure and communities fearing disenfranchisement.

3. Abhishek Banerjee’s Allegations

Banerjee declared:

• The EC was deliberately planting selective leaks.
• These leaks were “outright lies” designed to mislead the public.
• The Commission must release full CCTV footage and every piece of evidence.
• Anything less exposes the EC’s “bad faith.”

His remarks sharpened TMC’s offensive against the EC, framing the issue as one of transparency versus manipulation.

4. The Five Questions TMC Posed Earlier

TMC had earlier asked five basic questions:

1. Why is Bengal singled out for SIR while other border states are exempt?
2. If rolls are unreliable, does that invalidate the Lok Sabha elected last year?
3. Will EC take responsibility for BLO deaths linked to workload?
4. Why are Bangla Sahayata Kendra staff barred from assisting BLOs?
5. Does BJP’s claim of deleting one crore names mean it controls the EC?

The EC allegedly refused to answer these, intensifying mistrust.

5. Governance Challenges Exposed

The incident highlights systemic governance failures:

• Unrealistic deadlines imposed by EC.
• Weak communication with BLOs and political parties.
• Poor technology infrastructure in rural areas.
• Delayed response to BLO grievances and deaths.

Without reforms, electoral integrity itself is at risk.

6. Political Fallout

The controversy has political consequences:

• TMC accused EC of bias and lack of transparency.
• BJP defended EC’s autonomy, framing TMC as obstructive.
• Civil society debated governance failures in electoral processes.

The issue has become a flashpoint ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections.

7. Abhishek Banerjee Accuses EC: Observers’ Warning

Special observers flagged:

• BLOs were keeping forms without uploading them on the BLO app.
• Dead, absent, shifted, and duplicate voters were not being marked.
• Opposition parties alleged ruling party cadres pressured BLOs to hand over forms.
• Around 7.03 crore forms digitised out of 7.65 crore distributed, but progress was slower than expected.

Their warning reflects the systemic risks of rushed electoral exercises.

8. Historical Context: Electoral Roll Controversies

India has witnessed similar controversies:

• Assam’s NRC excluded millions due to documentation gaps.
• Past revisions saw BLOs complain of underpayment and overwork.
• Bengal’s SIR echoes these controversies, highlighting systemic flaws.

9. Broader Implications for Democracy

The incident raises fundamental questions:

• Can elections be credible if BLOs collapse under workload?
• Will voter rolls be accurate if frontline staff are demoralised?
• Does democracy risk losing legitimacy if electoral processes are rushed?

10. Recommendations for Reform

Experts suggest:

• Staggered timelines for voter roll revision.
• Hiring additional staff to support BLOs.
• Improved technology for faster digitisation.
• Compensation packages for BLO families.
• Policy reform to recognise BLOs as permanent electoral staff.

11. Comparative Lessons from Other States

Other states have faced similar controversies:

• Assam’s NRC excluded millions despite decades of residence.
• Tripura’s refugee politics shaped electoral outcomes.
• Bengal’s case reflects a national challenge of balancing electoral integrity with human dignity.

12. Human Stories: Families in Distress

Families of BLOs describe:

• Sudden collapses from exhaustion.
• Panic attacks and high blood pressure.
• Anxiety about punitive action if targets are missed.

These stories highlight the human cost of governance failures.

13. Law Enforcement and Accountability

Observers directed district magistrates to ensure:

• BLOs are not forced to visit homes more than thrice.
• No false information is uploaded on the BLO app.
• Accountability measures are enforced to prevent manipulation.

This reflects the importance of institutional safeguards in democracy.

14. Conclusion: A Test of Governance and Democracy

The Abhishek Banerjee Accuses EC of Selective Leaks in Bengal SIR 2025 is more than a bureaucratic exercise — it is a test of governance, democracy, and human dignity. Unless systemic reforms are undertaken, BLOs will remain vulnerable, and public trust in institutions will erode.

The controversy underscores the urgency of balancing electoral integrity with compassion for frontline workers and transparency in governance.

🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

• Election Commission of India (ECI): https://eci.gov.in
• Chief Electoral Officer, West Bengal: https://ceowestbengal.nic.in
• National Voters’ Service Portal (NVSP): https://www.nvsp.in
• Ministry of Home Affairs – Law and Order Division: https://mha.gov.in
• Press Information Bureau (Government of India): https://pib.gov.in
• West Bengal Government Official Portal: https://wb.gov.in

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More