Home Blog Page 4

April 11: Indian Stock Markets Open on a Bullish Note; Nifty Surges Over 380 Points

Mumbai, April 11, 2025 — The Indian equity markets kicked off Friday’s session with a powerful rally, fueled by strong global cues, renewed investor confidence, and optimistic sentiment surrounding India’s macroeconomic stability. The NIFTY 50 index, a benchmark for India’s top 50 listed companies, opened higher and quickly accelerated to post significant intra-day gains, reflecting robust buying interest across sectors.

Also Read: Indian Stock Markets Tumble on April 9, 2025: Nifty Slips Below 22,400 Amid Broad-Based Selling

This surge comes on the back of easing global inflation fears, favorable commentary from the U.S. Federal Reserve on interest rate stability, and encouraging domestic indicators such as healthy corporate earnings projections, moderate inflation data, and positive GDP outlook. With investor sentiment further bolstered by foreign institutional investor (FII) inflows and resilient performances in banking and financial stocks, market participants seem to be pricing in a potential bullish trend for the upcoming quarter.

The NIFTY 50 opened at 22,695.40, gaining strong upward momentum to reach a high of 22,874.45, before settling at 22,781.80 as of 10:49 AM IST—an increase of 382.65 points or 1.71%. The index has shown a broad-based upward movement with all major indices trading in the green, underlining wide investor participation and growing confidence in India’s economic trajectory.


📈 Index-Wise Performance

Index Current Level Gain (Points) % Change
NIFTY 50 22,781.80 +382.65 +1.71%
NIFTY NEXT 50 61,273.65 +609.05 +1.00%
NIFTY FIN SERVICE 24,487.55 +354.90 +1.47%
NIFTY BANK 50,817.85 +577.70 +1.15%
NIFTY 100 23,316.65 +364.20 +1.59%

In a robust start to the trading session on April 11, 2025, Indian benchmark indices surged significantly, reflecting strong investor sentiment and improved confidence in the domestic economic landscape. The NIFTY 50 opened on a bullish note and soared by 382.65 points, or 1.71%, to reach 22,781.80, marking one of its most decisive upward moves in recent weeks.

April 11: indian stock markets open on a bullish note; nifty surges over 380 pointsThe NIFTY NEXT 50 followed suit, rising by 609.05 points (+1.00%) to close at 61,273.65, while the NIFTY 100 advanced by 364.20 points to settle at 23,316.65, up by 1.59%.

Sectorally, the rally was primarily led by financial services and banking stocks, with the NIFTY FINANCIAL SERVICES index climbing 354.90 points to 24,487.55, registering a 1.47% gain. Simultaneously, the NIFTY BANK index surged by 577.70 points, or 1.15%, to close at 50,817.85, driven by expectations of stable interest rates and continued credit growth.

The market optimism was underpinned by positive macroeconomic indicators, including robust credit demand, easing inflation concerns, and strong corporate earnings outlooks for the upcoming quarter. Institutional buying and global cues further reinforced the upward momentum across indices.




🚀 Top Gainers: Strong Momentum in Midcaps

A wave of enthusiasm swept across the midcap segment during early trade on April 11, 2025, as several stocks posted double-digit gains, signaling renewed investor appetite for value and growth plays beyond the benchmark large-cap stocks. The top five gainers showcased not only impressive price appreciation but also healthy trading volumes—an indication of both institutional participation and retail bullishness.

Stock LTP (₹) Change (₹) % Change Volume (Lakh) Value (₹ Cr)
BINANIIND 17.37 +2.89 +19.96% 2.23 0.38
GOLDIAM 325.90 +53.45 +19.62% 52.28 168.56
GTL 9.31 +1.28 +15.94% 18.35 1.68
UMAEXPORTS 93.99 +12.87 +15.87% 3.28 2.98
CAMLINFINE 153.98 +20.55 +15.40% 35.32 53.69

Among the top performers, GOLDIAM INTERNATIONAL emerged as the standout gainer. The stock rallied by a whopping ₹53.45, or 19.62%, to reach ₹325.90, backed by an exceptional trading volume of 52.28 lakh shares and a total turnover exceeding ₹168 crore. This surge suggests heightened buying interest, possibly due to recent strong earnings reports, optimistic management commentary, or positive sectoral tailwinds in the gems and jewelry export space.

April 11: indian stock markets open on a bullish note; nifty surges over 380 pointsCAMLIN FINE SCIENCES (CAMLINFINE) also caught investor attention, jumping 15.40% with heavy volumes worth ₹53.69 crore, possibly fueled by news related to new product launches or increasing export orders in the specialty chemicals sector.

Other gainers like BINANI INDUSTRIES, GTL, and UMA EXPORTS delivered double-digit returns, driven by improved investor sentiment, speculative interest, and potential re-rating of their valuations.

The sharp upward movement in these midcaps underscores the ongoing rotation of capital from overvalued large caps to relatively underpriced yet fundamentally strong mid-tier companies. Analysts view this trend as a signal of growing confidence in the broader market recovery and an indicator that investors are increasingly looking beyond blue-chip counters to chase higher returns.


📉 Top Losers: Muthoot Finance Drags

While the broader Indian equity markets displayed strong upward momentum on April 11, 2025, a few stocks bucked the trend and came under significant selling pressure. Notably, weakness was observed in select mid- and small-cap counters, with concerns ranging from sector-specific headwinds to profit booking after recent rallies.

Stock LTP (₹) Change (₹) % Change Volume (Lakh) Value (₹ Cr)
MODTHREAD 32.52 -2.17 -6.26% 0.00 0.00
MUTHOOTFIN 2,009.95 -130.00 -6.07% 20.78 418.62
BLUECOAST 25.29 -1.34 -5.03% 0.00 0.00
GENSOL 132.66 -6.99 -5.01% 1.32 1.75
SHYAMTEL 12.70 -0.60 -4.51% 0.02 0.00

Among the top losers, Muthoot Finance (MUTHOOTFIN) stood out with the steepest fall in absolute value terms, plummeting ₹130.00 or 6.07% to close at ₹2,009.95. The decline came despite a high trading volume of 20.78 lakh shares and a total turnover exceeding ₹418 crore, signaling strong selling pressure from both institutional and retail investors.

Aprill 11Analysts believe that the fall in Muthoot Finance could be linked to investor concerns surrounding the earnings outlook for non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), particularly in the context of rising borrowing costs, asset quality issues in rural markets, or a muted gold loan growth forecast. Additionally, profit-booking after a strong rally in the past few sessions may have exacerbated the downside move.

Other underperformers included MODTHREAD and BLUECOAST, both declining by over 5%, although they witnessed negligible trading activity, suggesting thin liquidity and low investor interest. GENSOL and SHYAMTEL also saw notable declines amid muted volumes, potentially triggered by broader sectoral volatility or lack of positive triggers.

The divergence in stock performance despite a buoyant overall market indicates a selective investment approach by market participants, emphasizing fundamentals, earnings visibility, and sector-specific dynamics in their decision-making.


Sectoral Performance Breakdown

In the broader market rally observed on April 11, 2025, the bullish sentiment wasn’t limited to frontline financial and banking stocks. A strong and diversified sectoral performance added further stability to the indices. Information Technology (IT) stocks witnessed a moderate but steady uptick, buoyed by anticipation surrounding upcoming earnings releases of global tech giants in the U.S. markets. Investors are positioning themselves for a possible surprise in revenue guidance, which has historically triggered upward revisions in Indian IT counters due to their reliance on global demand.

The pharmaceutical sector also saw increased investor interest amid reports of improved export figures and favorable developments in regulatory approvals from agencies like the USFDA and EMA. Market participants took this as a sign of stronger revenue pipelines and reduced compliance risk, prompting accumulation in quality pharma names.

FMCG and automobile stocks contributed handsomely to the day’s gains, supported by early indicators pointing to a gradual recovery in rural demand, thanks to a healthy rabi crop and favorable monsoon forecasts. Improved consumer sentiment, along with strategic price adjustments by major FMCG players, appears to be working well for margin protection. In the auto space, analysts highlighted increased retail registrations and continued momentum in EV and two-wheeler sales, especially in Tier II and III cities.

On the commodities side, energy and infrastructure stocks extended their gains, riding on the back of a dip in international crude oil prices and the Indian government’s sustained focus on capex-led infrastructure growth. Companies in the EPC and logistics space have seen a sharp rise in order inflows and tender activity, reinforcing the positive outlook for the sector. The infrastructure push, aligned with the government’s pre-election spending strategy, has further fueled optimism across construction, cement, and capital goods segments.


🌍 Global Market Influence

The strong start to Indian equities on April 11 can also be attributed to robust global market cues, which set a favorable tone for investors across Asian markets. A positive close on Wall Street, fueled by encouraging macroeconomic indicators such as better-than-expected jobless claims data and resilient service sector output, played a pivotal role. Moreover, U.S. Treasury yields remained steady, reflecting investor confidence that the Federal Reserve may not resort to aggressive rate hikes in the coming quarters.

Asian equities, including Japan’s Nikkei 225, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng, and China’s Shanghai Composite, registered early gains, lending credibility to a region-wide recovery narrative. Improved trade data from China and policy support from the Japanese government further reassured global investors.

Adding to the positive atmosphere, recent U.S. inflation data showed moderation in both headline and core readings, reducing fears of imminent monetary tightening. This global reassurance around interest rate stability not only encouraged institutional inflows into emerging markets like India but also helped support the risk-on sentiment prevalent throughout the day.

Furthermore, geopolitical stability in key regions and a relatively calm crude oil market ensured that macroeconomic uncertainties remained muted, offering a clean slate for Indian equities to capitalize on the global uptrend.


💸 FII and DII Activity

The participation of institutional investors significantly boosted confidence on Dalal Street, as Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) emerged as net buyers for the session. FIIs focused primarily on heavyweight financials, select banking names, and quality midcap stocks. Analysts attribute this renewed buying interest to India’s resilient economic data, consistent earnings performance, and a relatively attractive valuation compared to global peers.

The institutional flows suggest that global funds are repositioning their portfolios in favor of emerging markets, with India high on their radar due to its strong GDP growth outlook, policy continuity, and a consumption-driven economy.

At the same time, Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs) continued to maintain a supportive stance in the equity markets. DIIs have been instrumental in providing stability during volatile sessions and are actively deploying funds into high-conviction themes such as infrastructure, manufacturing, and capital goods. Mutual funds, particularly those focused on SIP (Systematic Investment Plans), have played a significant role in absorbing supply and maintaining momentum.

The combination of synchronized institutional buying, supported by strong macroeconomic fundamentals and improving microeconomic metrics, has instilled greater confidence among retail and HNI (High Net-worth Individual) investors. This layered market participation underscores the growing depth and maturity of Indian capital markets.


Economic Indicators Update

The buoyant mood on Dalal Street is being reinforced by a favorable set of macroeconomic indicators released over the past few days. Chief among them is the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for March 2025, which came in below consensus estimates, providing much-needed relief to investors wary of prolonged inflationary pressures. The softer-than-expected inflation print significantly reduces the odds of near-term rate hikes by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), thereby supporting market liquidity and valuation multiples, particularly in rate-sensitive sectors like banking, real estate, and auto.

Additionally, Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections remained robust for the third consecutive month, crossing the ₹1.6 lakh crore mark. This indicates strong domestic consumption and compliance levels, reinforcing the narrative of economic resilience. Policymakers and analysts alike see this as a sign that the formal economy continues to expand despite global uncertainties.

Moreover, the latest data from the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) pointed to sustained expansion in both manufacturing and services sectors. The manufacturing PMI remained comfortably above the 50-mark threshold, reflecting rising output, new orders, and business confidence. Meanwhile, the services PMI showed robust growth in segments like transport, finance, and hospitality.

Lastly, the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) indicated a healthy year-on-year rise, particularly in capital goods and infrastructure-related industries — sectors often seen as early indicators of long-term investment cycles. Collectively, these macro signals paint a picture of a fundamentally strong and resilient Indian economy, giving both domestic and foreign investors added conviction in market stability and future upside potential.


📈 Technical Analysis Insights

From a technical analysis standpoint, the performance of benchmark indices on April 11, 2025, marks a critical shift in market momentum. The NIFTY 50 index decisively breached the key resistance level of 22,600, closing at 22,781.80 with significant volume backing the breakout. This confirms a bullish structure, and technical analysts are now setting sights on the 22,900–23,000 zone as the next immediate target.

The strength in the rally is further validated by technical indicators. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), currently hovering above the 70 mark, signals strong buying interest, though it also hints at short-term overbought conditions. Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remains in bullish territory, with a widening histogram, indicating sustained upward momentum.

The Bank Nifty, which often leads broader market moves, closed above the psychological level of 50,800, with immediate support identified around 50,200. This price action suggests institutional strength in banking counters, aided by strong earnings expectations and positive credit growth data.

Market experts advise a cautious yet optimistic approach, recommending traders to maintain strict stop-loss levels, as short-term consolidation is possible given the elevated RSI and rapid gains over the past few sessions. Nonetheless, the overall market structure remains bullish, with favorable technical signals across sectors.


🔍 Stocks to Watch

As the broader indices continue their upward trajectory, attention is now shifting toward specific stock picks that are showing signs of fresh accumulation and trading activity. Market participants are monitoring companies that have reported bulk or block deals, as these often indicate the entry of institutional players or high-net-worth investors, which can lead to further upside in the short term.

Stocks exhibiting a rise in delivery volumes — a signal that investors are buying to hold rather than trade — are drawing particular interest. This metric is seen as a strong indicator of confidence in the underlying fundamentals and future earnings visibility.

Board announcements and insider activity are also guiding investor decisions. Companies where promoters or senior executives have increased their stakes are being viewed favorably, as this often reflects internal confidence in business prospects.

In light of the ongoing Q4 earnings season, stocks from banking, IT, and auto sectors are under the microscope. These sectors are traditionally early reporters, and their numbers are expected to set the tone for broader market performance. Analysts believe companies that can deliver double-digit revenue growth, margin expansion, or strong guidance will likely attract disproportionate market attention.

In conclusion, stock-specific action is expected to intensify, driven by earnings, corporate disclosures, and sectoral rotation strategies. Investors are advised to remain nimble, tracking both technical cues and fundamental triggers as the earnings calendar unfolds.


📅 Market Outlook & Expert Commentary

Experts remain optimistic about the near-term outlook, citing strong domestic fundamentals, improving global cues, and steady earnings visibility. Analysts recommend a stock-specific strategy, focusing on fundamentally strong companies with growth potential and earnings stability. As the market approaches all-time highs, some degree of profit-booking may emerge, but this is likely to be offset by buy-on-dips sentiment from long-term investors. The overall tone remains constructive, with upcoming sessions expected to be driven by earnings reports, central bank commentary, and global market developments.


📌 Conclusion: Market Outlook Remains Optimistic Amid Global and Domestic Tailwinds

Friday’s strong opening reinforces the prevailing bullish undertone in Indian equities. The synchronized uptrend across major indices—especially Nifty Bank and Nifty Financial Services—indicates a healthy market breadth and participation. The consistent rally in midcap stocks like Goldiam and Camlin FineChem further showcases investor appetite for high-growth stories outside the blue-chip domain.

Looking ahead, the Indian stock market appears poised for further gains, contingent on key macroeconomic data releases, quarterly earnings reports, and external factors such as global interest rate direction and geopolitical developments. With strong FII inflows, supportive domestic policy environment, and resilience in the banking and financial sectors, investor sentiment is likely to remain upbeat in the near term.

However, experts caution against excessive exuberance and recommend a stock-specific approach, especially as valuations in some segments inch higher. Traders and investors are advised to keep a close eye on corporate earnings guidance, crude oil price movements, and developments in the global bond markets for further cues.

In summary, the market’s spirited opening today sends a strong signal of optimism and resilience, setting the tone for what could be a robust Q2 for Indian equities.

For real-time stock prices, index movements, and detailed market updates, visit the official NSE website.

PM POSHAN Scheme Sees Major Boost: 9.5% Hike in ‘Material Cost’ to Strengthen Mid-Day Meals Across India

New Delhi  :In a major policy step aimed at strengthening nutritional security and addressing inflationary pressures, the Ministry of Education has officially approved a 9.5% increase in the ‘Material Cost’ component of the centrally sponsored Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN) scheme. The enhanced rates will be implemented nationwide starting May 1, 2025, and are projected to positively impact over 11.20 crore schoolchildren studying in 10.36 lakh Government and Government-aided schools, including Balvatika, Primary, and Upper Primary levels. This move reflects the government’s continued commitment to ensuring access to hot, cooked meals for children from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, thereby improving both educational participation and health outcomes.



PM POSHAN: A Cornerstone for Nutritional Support and Educational Equity

The Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN) scheme, earlier known as the Mid-Day Meal Scheme, is one of India’s largest social welfare programs aimed at addressing classroom hunger and malnutrition. Launched with the objective of ensuring that every child receives at least one balanced, hot cooked meal during school hours, the scheme currently benefits over 11.20 crore children across 10.36 lakh Government and Government-aided schools. It includes children from Balvatika (pre-primary) to Class VIII, covering both rural and urban areas.

Pm poshan scheme sees major boost: 9. 5% hike in ‘material cost’ to strengthen mid-day meals across indiaThe nutritional standards under PM POSHAN are meticulously designed: children in the primary section receive meals with a minimum of 450 calories and 12 grams of protein, while those in the upper primary are provided with 700 calories and 20 grams of protein per meal. These meals include essential components like pulses, vegetables, oil, and spices, customized as per local taste and availability, thereby also promoting local agriculture and employment through decentralized procurement.

Beyond nutrition, the scheme also aims to enhance school participation, particularly among girls, children from Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and economically weaker sections. Studies have shown that the availability of mid-day meals has positively influenced school enrollment, attendance, and learning outcomes, while also easing the burden on families struggling with food insecurity.

The PM POSHAN scheme plays a dual role in nation-building: ensuring children’s right to food and education while contributing to social equity and public health. The program also serves as a crucial employment generator for over 25 lakh cooks and helpers, many of whom are women, thus supporting gender empowerment and rural livelihoods.

📈 Inflation-Linked Enhancement: Why the Hike?

In response to rising food prices and cost-of-living adjustments, the Ministry of Education has approved a 9.5% increase in the ‘Material Cost’ under the PM POSHAN Scheme, ensuring that the nutritional quality of meals served in schools does not deteriorate due to inflationary pressures. This adjustment is anchored in the Consumer Price Index for Rural Labourers (CPI-RL), a reliable metric developed by the Labour Bureau under the Ministry of Labour.

The CPI-RL is derived from monthly price data collected from 600 villages across 20 Indian states, reflecting changes in the cost of essential commodities like pulses, vegetables, edible oil, spices, and fuel. This ensures that the revised material cost remains in tune with real market trends, helping to maintain both the quantity and quality of the meals served to schoolchildren.

The updated per student, per day material cost will be applicable from May 1, 2025, and the revised rates are as follows:

Class Group Previous Rate (₹) New Rate (₹) Increase (₹)
Bal Vatika 6.19 6.78 0.59
Primary (Class I–V) 6.19 6.78 0.59
Upper Primary (Class VI–VIII) 9.29 10.17 0.88

This enhancement comes at a significant cost to the exchequer. The Central Government will absorb the full financial impact, which is estimated to be around ₹954 crore in FY 2025–26. Despite this additional expenditure, the move has been widely welcomed by nutritionists and education experts as a timely and necessary intervention to preserve the program’s effectiveness in light of rising food inflation.

🧂 What Goes into a PM POSHAN Meal?

Under the PM POSHAN Scheme, ‘Material Cost’ refers to the expenditure incurred on procuring core cooking ingredients that form the basis of a nutritious school meal. These include pulses, vegetables, cooking oil, spices, condiments, and fuel, carefully portioned to meet the age-specific dietary needs of children.

The standard ingredient allocation per student per meal is as follows:

  • Pulses: 20 grams (Balvatika/Primary), 30 grams (Upper Primary)

  • Vegetables: 50 grams (Balvatika/Primary), 75 grams (Upper Primary)

  • Oil: 5 grams (Balvatika/Primary), 7.5 grams (Upper Primary)

  • Spices & Fuel: As per requirement

This base allocation ensures children receive a protein- and fiber-rich diet that supports their physical and cognitive development. In addition, States and Union Territories are empowered to enhance these meals by contributing beyond the minimum prescribed cost from their own resources.

Several states have already taken proactive steps to do so, introducing local staples, fortified foods, and even milk or fruit to the menu — transforming the PM POSHAN meal into a more comprehensive nutritional aid. These customizations not only enrich the diet but also foster a connection with regional culinary diversity, making meals more relatable and appealing for students.

🚛 Food Grains & Logistics: A Fully Funded Effort

While the ‘Material Cost’ ensures the procurement of key ingredients, the backbone of the PM POSHAN Scheme lies in its robust foodgrain and logistics infrastructure—a cost-intensive component that is entirely funded by the Central Government.

Every year, approximately 26 lakh metric tonnes of foodgrains are allocated for the scheme through the Food Corporation of India (FCI). These foodgrains serve as the staple base for the hot cooked meals provided daily to students from Balvatika to Class VIII. Importantly, the Government of India bears 100% of the cost of these foodgrains, which amounts to around ₹9,000 crore annually.

In addition to the procurement cost, the Centre also fully funds the transportation charges—ensuring seamless delivery from FCI depots to individual schools across states and union territories. This commitment eliminates financial strain on states for this critical aspect of the scheme, ensuring equity and uninterrupted meal provision nationwide.

When all components—ingredients, foodgrains, fuel, labor, and logistics—are factored in, the total cost per student per meal is calculated as:

  • ₹12.13 for students in Balvatika and Primary classes (I–V)

  • ₹17.62 for students in Upper Primary classes (VI–VIII)

This level of comprehensive support not only safeguards food security but also affirms the government’s dedication to holistic child welfare through nutrition, education, and social equity.

A National Commitment to Child Welfare

The recent enhancement of material cost under the PM POSHAN Scheme is more than just a fiscal adjustment—it is a clear reaffirmation of the Government of India’s long-standing commitment to the health, education, and holistic development of the country’s children. With over 11.20 crore students benefiting daily, the scheme plays a pivotal role in bridging nutritional gaps, especially among children from economically disadvantaged and marginalized communities.

Pm poshan scheme sees major boost: 9. 5% hike in ‘material cost’ to strengthen mid-day meals across indiaBy addressing both hunger and classroom participation, PM POSHAN has become a cornerstone of India’s social welfare framework. The provision of a nutritious hot cooked meal not only improves children’s physical health and cognitive performance but also contributes to higher school enrollment, attendance, and retention rates—particularly in rural, tribal, and remote areas where food insecurity and school dropout rates tend to be higher.

Furthermore, this scheme fosters gender equity and social inclusion by creating jobs for thousands of women as cooks and helpers in schools, many of whom belong to self-help groups and underprivileged backgrounds. The inclusion of Balvatika (pre-primary) students under the scheme reflects a forward-looking approach, recognizing that nutrition in early childhood is critical for long-term development.

In times marked by inflation and socio-economic challenges, the government’s decision to absorb the additional ₹954 crore financial burden without shifting the cost to states or families signals an unwavering focus on child-centric policy-making. As India strides towards its educational and public health goals, the PM POSHAN Scheme continues to symbolize nutritional justice and inclusive progress, ensuring that no child is left behind in the pursuit of learning and well-being.

To learn more about the PM POSHAN Scheme, visit the official Ministry of Education portal.

For more Real time updates, visit Channel 6 Network.

Rebel Kid Breaks Silence on Latent Controversy, Cites Industry Bias and Personal Misrepresentation

New Delhi : After months of hushed speculation, ambiguous lyrics, and cryptic social media posts, Rebel Kid — one of India’s most enigmatic and genre-defying independent artists — has finally addressed the simmering controversy that has quietly circulated within entertainment and music circles. For a long time, the issue was dubbed “latent” by fans and media alike due to the artist’s conspicuous silence and absence of direct acknowledgment. However, in a recent interview and through a series of candid posts, Rebel Kid has now shed light on what he describes as “a calculated effort to suppress independent voices.”

The controversy centers around serious allegations, including instances of deliberate sidelining by major event organizers, sabotage of scheduled performances, digital shadow-banning of his content, and the unchecked dominance of industry gatekeepers who, according to him, selectively promote commercially driven acts at the cost of raw, authentic voices. Rebel Kid’s revelations have reignited conversations about internal industry politics, fairness in music distribution platforms, and the future of India’s indie scene.



Who is Rebel Kid? The Influencer Behind the Name

Apoorva Mukhija, popularly known by her online persona The Rebel Kid, has carved a unique space for herself in the Indian digital landscape. Renowned for her candid storytelling, relatable content, and signature mini-vlogs, she’s earned a loyal following among Gen Z for her unfiltered take on daily life, identity, and self-expression. But beyond the reels and vlogs, Apoorva recently found herself in the eye of a social media storm.

A comment she made during an appearance on comedian Samay Raina’s YouTube show India’s Got Latent sparked widespread debate and backlash, suddenly thrusting her into an unexpected controversy. While she has often championed authenticity, this incident revealed the challenges influencers face when their digital narratives collide with public scrutiny. Despite the criticism, Rebel Kid continues to use her platform to speak out, turning a moment of adversity into one of dialogue and introspection.

A Long-Awaited Clarification: Breaking the Silence with Rolling Stone India

In a powerful and emotionally charged interview with Rolling Stone India, Rebel Kid — one of India’s most daring and genre-defying independent artists — finally opened up about the controversy that has loomed over her career. Known for her sharp lyricism and boundary-pushing visuals, she addressed the reasons behind her prolonged silence and withdrawal from mainstream collaborations, citing a “toxic culture of favoritism” and “manufactured narratives” that distorted her artistic identity.

Rebel kid breaks silence on latent controversy, cites industry bias and personal misrepresentation“I’ve never been afraid of standing out,” Rebel Kid shared. “But when your truth becomes inconvenient for people in power, they try to rewrite your story.”

She further revealed that her decision to stay silent was initially a form of resistance — a belief that her art would speak louder than industry politics. However, as she noted, that silence was eventually turned against her.

“I chose to be silent for a while because I believed my work would speak louder. But the silence was being weaponized against me,” she said, visibly emotional.

The revelations have resonated deeply with her fanbase, many of whom had been decoding her cryptic posts and lyrical metaphors for months. This interview marks a turning point in her narrative — one where she reclaims her voice and reshapes the public perception around her journey.

Background of the Controversy: Timeline of Tensions

The roots of the controversy trace back to late 2023, when Rebel Kid unexpectedly pulled out of a high-profile collaboration with one of Bollywood’s biggest music labels — a deal that had been heavily promoted and anticipated by fans. While initial reports cited “creative differences,” whispers within the industry and anonymous insider accounts painted a more troubling picture.

According to leaked communications and unconfirmed yet widely circulated reports, Rebel Kid had been intentionally sidelined after she refused to compromise on her artistic vision — a stance perceived by some industry executives as “non-cooperative” or “too radical for mainstream appeal.”

Shortly after the fallout, Rebel Kid’s much-anticipated nationwide tour was abruptly canceled without explanation, leading to a flood of speculation across social media platforms. Fans and fellow artists began raising questions about the pattern of exclusion and subtle silencing of independent voices who don’t “fit the mold” of India’s polished pop industry. Hashtags like #LetArtistsBreathe and #SupportRebelKid began trending on X (formerly Twitter), as supporters accused the mainstream music industry of gatekeeping and punishing creative nonconformity.

Speaking Out Against Online Abuse

In a bold and courageous move, Apoorva Mukhija, widely known as The Rebel Kid, recently took to her social media to expose the brutal reality of online harassment she’s been facing — including rape and death threats. The influencer shared screenshots of vile messages and called out the culture of digital bullying that disproportionately targets outspoken women.

Her revelation has struck a chord across the internet, with fellow creators, public figures, and thousands of followers flooding her posts with messages of solidarity and strength. The hashtag #StandWithRebelKid has been gaining momentum, and messages like “More power to you” and “Thank you for speaking up” have dominated comment sections — a testament to the growing movement against cyberbullying and the urgent need for accountability in the digital space.

Expert and Industry Reactions: A Wider Cultural Reckoning

Rebel Kid’s revelations have triggered widespread reactions from across India’s music and entertainment ecosystem. Music critics, fellow artists, and culture commentators have begun to unpack what her statements imply about the broader state of the industry — particularly its handling of independent and non-conformist talent.

Renowned cultural analyst Sudha Menon, speaking on a recent panel discussion hosted by The Music Journal, said, “Rebel Kid symbolizes the future of Indian indie music — unfiltered, genre-defying, and deeply rooted in personal storytelling. The industry, which is still largely driven by formulaic content and market-tested personas, often struggles to accommodate such authenticity.”

Meanwhile, Raghav Mehta, a respected veteran music producer known for working on several blockbuster albums, subtly weighed in via X (formerly Twitter). “There are stories that never get told because they’re too uncomfortable for the business side of art,” he wrote — a cryptic post that many believe was aimed squarely at the Rebel Kid controversy.

Other independent artists, including rapper MC Mira and singer-songwriter Tanaya J, have also voiced solidarity with Rebel Kid, applauding her courage to speak up and calling for greater transparency and accountability in how the industry handles contracts, narratives, and mental health.

The episode has reignited conversations around gatekeeping, creative suppression, and the psychological toll on artists who refuse to conform to commercial expectations — issues that have long simmered beneath the surface but rarely make it to the mainstream headlines.

Impact on Rebel Kid’s Image and Following: From Silence to Solidarity

Far from diminishing her public stature, the controversy appears to have galvanized Rebel Kid’s fan base and significantly boosted her visibility in the digital space. According to industry analytics firm StreamPulse India, Rebel Kid’s streaming figures on major platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube Music witnessed a 35% spike in the 48 hours following the publication of her interview with Rolling Stone India.

Her latest single, “The Silence You Made”, a haunting track widely interpreted as a veiled response to her experience, has shot to the top of various independent music charts, including India Indie Weekly, SoundWaves Rising Artists, and even entered Spotify India’s Viral 50 list — a rare feat for a completely independent artist.

The wave of support has also taken over social media, where fans and fellow musicians have rallied around her. The hashtag #WeStandWithRebel trended for over 24 hours on X (formerly Twitter), with over 200,000 mentions and counting. Influencers, artists, and mental health advocates have shared the tag alongside stories of their own industry struggles, making the movement not just about Rebel Kid, but a broader call for reform and respect for creative autonomy.

Even media personalities and entertainment critics have praised her handling of the situation, calling it “graceful, honest, and overdue.” Rebel Kid, it seems, has turned a moment of marginalization into a groundswell of artistic and social empowerment.

A Turning Point? A New Chapter Begins

Rebel Kid concluded the emotionally charged interview not with bitterness, but with a powerful message of resilience and defiance — one that resonated deeply with her growing base of admirers and fellow creatives.

Rebel kid breaks silence on latent controversy, cites industry bias and personal misrepresentation“I’m not here for validation. I’m here to create fearlessly. And for every artist out there who’s been told they’re ‘too much’ or ‘too different’ — keep going,” she said, her voice steady and clear, echoing the sentiment of many independent voices navigating the complexities of India’s entertainment landscape.

In a surprising revelation, Rebel Kid also announced that she has been quietly working on an independent documentary that will chronicle her artistic journey. The project, currently in post-production, is said to include never-before-seen behind-the-scenes footage, personal vlogs, studio sessions, and candid moments from the past year — a year defined by both emotional turmoil and creative breakthroughs.

The documentary aims to peel back the layers of glitz and glamour often associated with the industry, exposing the real struggles of non-conforming artists who dare to challenge systemic norms. Industry insiders hint that the film may also feature testimonials from fellow creatives and collaborators who have either witnessed or experienced similar treatment.

Set for release on a prominent streaming platform later this year, the documentary could mark a pivotal moment — not only in Rebel Kid’s career but also in how the industry confronts uncomfortable truths.

For a deeper look into Rebel Kid’s revelations check her latest Youtube video-Till I say it is

For more Real time updates, visit Channel 6 Network.

Rain in Delhi-NCR May Bring Relief from Scorching Heat Today; IMD Warns of Heatwave Conditions Persisting in Some Areas

Delhi-NCR: After days of relentless heat, residents of Delhi-NCR are expected to experience a welcome shift in weather, as the India Meteorological Department (IMD) has predicted light to moderate rainfall along with thunderstorms across various parts of the region today. This anticipated change is part of a larger pattern influenced by an active western disturbance approaching North India, combined with an influx of moisture-laden easterly winds from the Bay of Bengal. These weather systems are expected to trigger convective activity, resulting in scattered showers, gusty winds, and potential lightning strikes throughout the day.

Also Read: Delhi Heatwave Update: Relief Expected After April 9, Says IMD

The rainfall, though not widespread or intense, is likely to provide temporary relief from the severe heatwave that has blanketed the national capital and adjoining areas for the past several days. Daytime temperatures have consistently hovered around 44°C in Delhi and parts of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, pushing the region into the red category of heatwave alerts issued by the IMD. The expected showers could bring down temperatures by 2–4°C, improving outdoor conditions, air quality, and overall comfort for residents who have been struggling with intense heat and high humidity.

Moreover, officials have advised people to remain cautious during thunderstorms, especially in open areas, and to plan their travel accordingly as sudden rains may disrupt traffic flow and cause temporary waterlogging in low-lying parts of the city.



Unbearable Heat Persists Across Delhi-NCR

For the past several days, Delhi and its surrounding cities — including Gurugram, Noida, Faridabad, and Ghaziabad — have been reeling under intense heatwave conditions, with daytime temperatures consistently ranging between 42°C and 44°C. In some localities, mercury levels even breached the 45°C mark, making it one of the hottest spells this summer season. The scorching heat, coupled with hot and dry westerly winds, has significantly worsened living conditions, especially during the afternoon hours when the sun is at its peak.

Heat
 

This persistent heatwave has prompted health authorities and municipal bodies to issue advisories urging people to stay indoors during peak hours, remain hydrated, and take precautions against heatstroke. The elderly, infants, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions are particularly at risk. Several hospitals across the NCR have reported a noticeable increase in cases related to heat exhaustion, dehydration, and sunburn.

Local vendors, daily wage workers, and school children have been among the worst affected, with many forced to brave the harsh weather to fulfill their daily responsibilities. The heat has also had a noticeable impact on electricity consumption, with demand for cooling appliances pushing power grids closer to capacity.

IMD Forecast: Rain, Thunderstorms Expected in Parts of Delhi-NCR

In a much-needed respite from the extreme summer heat, the India Meteorological Department (IMD) has forecast light to moderate rainfall accompanied by gusty winds of 30–40 km/h and isolated thunderstorms across Delhi and its adjoining NCR areas including Gurugram, Noida, Faridabad, and Ghaziabad later today. The shift in weather is attributed to a western disturbance currently active over the western Himalayan region, which is pulling in moisture-laden southwesterly winds from the Arabian Sea into the northwestern plains.

This synoptic system is expected to result in convective cloud formation and sporadic showers, particularly in the late afternoon and evening hours. IMD data reveals that Delhi’s Safdarjung observatory recorded a maximum temperature of 43.2°C on Wednesday—5°C above the seasonal average. In contrast, today’s maximum temperature is expected to range between 38°C to 40°C, providing a marginal but crucial drop for residents reeling from the ongoing heatwave.

There is a possibility of rainfall in Delhi and adjoining NCR today, which may lead to a slight drop in maximum temperatures. However, heatwave conditions may continue in isolated pockets, especially in areas that do not receive rain,” said an IMD official.

The IMD’s extended outlook suggests that the relief may be temporary, with clear skies and rising temperatures expected to return by the weekend. Authorities have also warned of potential disruptions due to localized dust storms or sudden rainfall, urging commuters to plan accordingly and stay updated through official channels.

Heatwave Still a Threat in Pockets Despite Expected Rain

While the anticipated rainfall and gusty winds may offer short-term relief, the India Meteorological Department (IMD) has cautioned that heatwave conditions are likely to persist in isolated pockets of Delhi, southern Haryana, eastern Rajasthan, and parts of western Uttar Pradesh. The IMD has issued a yellow alert for multiple districts across these states, advising people to avoid prolonged exposure to the sun between 12 PM and 4 PM, especially vulnerable populations such as children, senior citizens, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions.

On Wednesday, cities like Phalodi and Ganganagar in Rajasthan recorded scorching highs of 45.6°C and 45.3°C respectively, while parts of southern Haryana and western UP breached the 44°C mark. In the National Capital Region, areas like Najafgarh, Mungeshpur, and Narela saw mercury levels touch or exceed 44°C, well above the normal range for this time of year.

The IMD reiterated that the incoming western disturbance will weaken by Friday, after which dry and hot northwesterly winds are expected to return, pushing daytime temperatures back to 41–43°C in affected regions. This potential rebound in temperature underscores the transient nature of the current weather change.

The rainfall will bring marginal cooling, but it will not be sufficient to end the heatwave pattern entirely. The risk of heat-related illnesses remains, especially where rains are patchy or absent,” an IMD scientist explained.

Authorities have advised residents to stay hydrated, wear loose cotton clothing, avoid strenuous outdoor activity during peak hours, and monitor updates from the regional weather centers. Health departments across states have also ramped up preparedness, with hospitals on alert to handle a possible increase in heatstroke cases.

Health Advisory Issued Amid Rising Heat Concerns

As temperatures continue to soar across Delhi-NCR and surrounding states, the India Meteorological Department (IMD), in coordination with public health authorities, has issued a comprehensive heatwave advisory for the general public. This comes in response to the increasing number of heat-related illnesses being reported in both urban and rural healthcare facilities.

Authorities have urged residents to adopt the following precautionary measures to safeguard their health during this period:

  • 💧 Stay Well-Hydrated: Drink plenty of water throughout the day, even if you’re not feeling thirsty. Oral rehydration salts (ORS), lemon water with salt and sugar, and buttermilk are also recommended to replenish lost electrolytes.

  • 🌞 Avoid Outdoor Activity During Peak Hours (12 PM – 4 PM): This is when the sun’s rays are at their strongest. Outdoor laborers, delivery workers, and school children are especially at risk during these hours.

  • 👕 Wear Light, Breathable Clothing: Loose-fitting cotton clothes in light colors help the body stay cool and minimize the risk of heat exhaustion.

  • 🧴 Use Sun Protection: Apply sunscreen with SPF 30 or above to avoid sunburns. Wearing sunglasses, wide-brimmed hats, or carrying umbrellas can also shield from direct sun exposure.

  • 🧓 Check on Vulnerable Individuals: Elderly people, infants, pregnant women, and those with pre-existing health conditions (such as diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease) are more susceptible to heatstroke. Ensure they stay indoors in cool environments and remain hydrated.

  • 🪟 Ventilation & Cooling: Keep windows open during early morning and evening hours to allow airflow. Use fans, coolers, or air conditioning where possible. If unavailable, consider visiting community centers or public cooling shelters.

  • 🚫 Avoid Alcohol & Caffeinated Drinks: These can lead to increased dehydration. Opt for water and electrolyte-rich drinks instead.

Healthcare providers have also been instructed to maintain adequate stock of IV fluids, ORS, and emergency medications to manage an expected rise in heatstroke and dehydration cases.

Prevention is the best protection during a heatwave. Early symptoms like excessive sweating, fatigue, dizziness, or nausea should not be ignored,” said a senior doctor at Safdarjung Hospital.

Delhi’s Summer Woes Continue

The unrelenting summer heat has once again exposed the growing vulnerability of Delhi-NCR to the urban heat island (UHI) effect, a phenomenon where metropolitan areas experience significantly higher temperatures than surrounding rural regions. This is primarily due to dense concrete structures, asphalt roads, reduced vegetation, and heat generated from vehicular and industrial emissions.

Over the past week, maximum temperatures in Delhi-NCR have consistently hovered between 42°C and 44.5°C, with some interior parts such as Mungeshpur, Najafgarh, and Pitampura recording peaks of 45°C. These temperatures are 4–5°C above normal for this time of the year, according to IMD’s regional data.

Climatologists warn that the heat island effect in Delhi has intensified over the past decade, with satellite data showing a 2°C average rise in surface temperatures in densely built-up zones compared to green belts and water-rich areas like the Yamuna floodplain.

Urban environmentalists emphasize the need for sustainable city planning to combat the rising heat:

  • 🌳 Increase Urban Green Cover: Expand tree plantation drives, rooftop gardens, and vertical green walls to act as natural cooling agents.

  • 💧 Promote Water Conservation: Preserve water bodies and enhance rainwater harvesting systems to retain moisture in the urban landscape.

  • 🛣️ Use Heat-Reflective Building Materials: Encourage the use of cool roofs, white paint, and permeable pavements in infrastructure design.

  • 📢 Public Awareness Campaigns: Educate citizens on the importance of reducing carbon footprints and supporting eco-friendly practices.

Urban areas like Delhi are warming faster than surrounding regions due to poor planning and unchecked construction. Without mitigation strategies, summer extremes will become the norm rather than the exception,” warned Dr. Arvind Shukla, a senior climate scientist at TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute).

For detailed updates and daily forecasts, citizens are encouraged to follow the official India Meteorological Department (IMD) website.

Trump’s 90-Day Tariff Pause Sparks Global Market Rally: Asian Indices Rebound Amid Widespread Relief

Asia: In a major turn of events that has sent shockwaves through global financial markets, current U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 90-day tariff pause on the implementation of most new reciprocal tariffs—a move widely interpreted as a strategic recalibration amid growing international dissent. The announcement comes after weeks of sharp criticism from key trade allies, global corporations, and major economic blocs, all cautioning against the destabilizing effects of intensifying protectionism. Trump, who has positioned tariffs as a cornerstone of his trade policy aimed at “rebalancing” U.S. economic relations, faced mounting diplomatic pressure and investor unease as concerns over a prolonged trade conflict escalated.

Also Read: Trump Imposes 125% Tariff on China, Suspends Other Tariffs for 90 Days Amid Global Tensions

This policy reversal arrives at a critical juncture when global trade volumes were already declining, with the World Trade Organization (WTO) forecasting a mere 0.8% growth in global merchandise trade for the year, a sharp drop from previous estimates of 2.6%. The impact of persistent trade tensions had begun to weigh heavily on the global economic outlook, especially in Asian export economies such as China, South Korea, Japan, and Vietnam, where businesses were preparing for long-term disruptions. Exporters across sectors—from technology and automotive to semiconductors and heavy machinery—were bracing for diminished orders, tighter margins, and potential layoffs.

This unexpected pause in U.S. tariff escalation marks a potential cooling-off period in what many analysts were calling the “second wave of trade wars”, reminiscent of the 2018–2019 U.S.–China tariff standoff that shaved off nearly $1.7 trillion from global market capitalization during its peak.



Global Context: Mounting Pressure Forces Policy Shift

Trump’s tariff strategy—once hailed by his supporters as a bold attempt to restore American manufacturing dominance—has increasingly come under fire from across the economic and political spectrum. While initially intended to curb trade imbalances and protect domestic industries, the blanket imposition of duties on hundreds of billions worth of imports has triggered retaliatory tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and rising costs for American consumers and businesses alike.

The latest round of tariff hikes, which would have affected over $250 billion in strategic imports, including semiconductors, rare earth materials, electronics, steel, and automotive parts, drew especially sharp criticism. Business leaders from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Retail Federation, and Fortune 500 companies warned that the continued escalation could lead to job losses, reduced investor confidence, and a deepening recession risk.

Facing diplomatic pressure from key trading partners—most notably Japan, South Korea, Germany, France, and Canada—Trump was reportedly urged in multiple closed-door meetings and backchannel discussions to reconsider his aggressive stance. These nations, whose economies are tightly intertwined with global supply chains, raised concerns that prolonged trade instability could shave up to 1.2 percentage points off global GDP growth, according to IMF projections.

Trump’s 90-day tariff pause sparks global market rally: asian indices rebound amid widespread reliefOn Tuesday, Trump relented. In a brief but highly watched press conference, he announced a 90-day moratorium on the next wave of tariffs. “This is not a retreat, but a realignment,” Trump said, stressing the need to “give our allies and trade partners a window to negotiate fair terms.” He also indicated that the pause would be used to “reassess the economic impact” of existing tariffs, suggesting the possibility of further policy revisions depending on market and diplomatic feedback.

Asian Markets Surge in Response

Asian stock markets reacted swiftly and decisively to Trump’s announcement, staging a powerful rally that reversed weeks of anxiety-driven sell-offs. The sudden suspension of tariff hikes sparked renewed investor optimism, especially in export-driven economies that had been on the frontlines of the trade war fallout.

In Japan, the Nikkei 225 surged by 8.3%, marking its largest single-day gain since June 2016, when markets rebounded after the Brexit shock. Export-heavy sectors such as automobiles (Toyota +9.1%, Honda +8.6%) and consumer electronics (Sony +10.2%) led the rally, reflecting optimism that trade barriers may be relaxed during the moratorium.

South Korea’s Kospi jumped by 5.5%, driven by strong performances in semiconductor and tech stocks, with Samsung Electronics rising 7.8% and SK Hynix gaining 6.9%. Analysts attributed the spike to expectations of stable global demand and reduced tariff burdens on Korean-made memory chips and display panels.

In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng Index climbed 3.7%, as foreign and institutional investors re-entered positions in Alibaba (+6.5%), Tencent (+5.9%), and other tech giants that had been heavily exposed to geopolitical risks. The pause in tariffs also temporarily eased pressure on the Chinese yuan, strengthening regional currency stability.

Meanwhile, Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 rose 4.7%, its best intraday performance since November 2020. Resource companies such as BHP Group and Rio Tinto soared on hopes of restored commodity demand from Asia. The rally was also fueled by renewed confidence in the mining, banking, and logistics sectors, all of which had been reeling from fears of reduced export volumes.

Trading volumes across Asia spiked significantly, with Tokyo Stock Exchange turnover exceeding ¥3.2 trillion ($21 billion)—nearly double its 30-day average. Analysts noted that the relief rally reflected both a correction from oversold levels and a vote of confidence in the possibility of upcoming trade negotiations.

This widespread rebound came as a welcome relief to investors, portfolio managers, and corporate executives who had feared a prolonged economic downturn driven by tit-for-tat tariff escalations and disrupted trade flows. However, many warned that markets remained vulnerable to further political volatility if negotiations during the 90-day pause falter.

Wall Street’s Historic Rally

The impact of Trump’s tariff pause extended far beyond Asia, sparking a historic rally on Wall Street that echoed across global financial centers. In one of the most dramatic single-day market turnarounds since the 2008 financial crisis, U.S. stocks soared as investor fears over an imminent trade war recession gave way to hopes of renewed diplomatic engagement and economic stability.

The S&P 500 surged 9.5%, marking its largest single-session percentage gain since October 2008, when coordinated global monetary action helped calm panic-stricken markets during the Great Recession. Gains were broad-based, with all 11 sectors finishing in the green, led by technology, consumer discretionary, and industrials.

Trump’s 90-day tariff pause sparks global market rally: asian indices rebound amid widespread reliefThe Dow Jones Industrial Average skyrocketed by 7.9%, adding nearly 3,000 points in just one session and surpassing the 36,000 mark for the first time in weeks. Heavyweights like Boeing (+10.4%), Caterpillar (+9.1%), and 3M (+8.7%) were among the top performers, reflecting renewed investor confidence in export-oriented manufacturing and infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite jumped 12%, its second-largest daily gain in history, driven by a tech sector that had been under immense pressure from supply chain disruptions and trade uncertainty. Apple (+11.3%), Nvidia (+14.6%), and Amazon (+13.9%) led the charge, as investors rushed back into mega-cap growth stocks.

Market analysts described the mood as “euphoric,” with trading floors seeing a dramatic shift from risk-off to risk-on sentiment. Volatility indices like the CBOE VIX plunged by over 30%, indicating a sharp reduction in investor anxiety. According to Bank of America Global Research, over $26 billion flowed back into U.S. equity funds within 24 hours, the largest single-day inflow in over a decade.

While enthusiasm was high, many strategists warned that the rally could be fragile if substantive progress isn’t made during the 90-day negotiation window. “Markets are celebrating the pause, not a resolution,” noted Morgan Stanley’s chief equity strategist Mike Wilson, adding that investors should prepare for volatility to return if talks break down.

China’s Position Remains Contentious

Despite the global market optimism following Trump’s 90-day tariff pause, the announcement was not without controversy—China, the U.S.’s largest trade partner, was notably excluded from the moratorium. Instead, in a move that reignited tensions, the U.S. escalated tariffs on a broad range of Chinese imports to 125%, a steep hike affecting goods across electronics, textiles, solar panels, machinery, and consumer products.

Beijing responded within hours, announcing a retaliatory tariff increase on U.S. imports to 84%, targeting American agricultural products, automobiles, aerospace components, and liquefied natural gas (LNG). The Chinese Ministry of Commerce condemned the U.S. move as “unilateral and provocative,” warning that it would “seriously jeopardize any future trade discussions unless fully reversed.”

The exclusion of China from the tariff freeze has alarmed economists and geopolitical analysts alike. While the temporary relief in other trade corridors has fueled optimism, many fear that the U.S.–China trade standoff—often described as the core battleground of the global trade war—may be heading into a more aggressive and protracted phase. Over $650 billion in bilateral trade now faces heightened barriers, with major U.S. firms like Qualcomm, Tesla, and Intel expressing concerns over rising costs and disrupted access to Chinese markets.

According to a recent Goldman Sachs report, the latest escalation could cut 0.5% off both U.S. and Chinese GDP growth in 2025 if sustained, with downstream effects on global manufacturing, inflation, and investment flows. Furthermore, supply chain experts warn that businesses may fast-track “decoupling” strategies—relocating manufacturing bases from China to countries like Vietnam, India, and Mexico—to hedge against prolonged geopolitical risk.

Diplomatically, this selective application of the pause risks undermining broader negotiations. China has already canceled a planned trade delegation to Washington next month and suspended talks on semiconductor cooperation and climate-linked supply chains. “This is a tactical maneuver that may win applause from allies but alienates the single most critical player in the global trade chessboard,” said Dr. Alice Feng, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

While markets elsewhere may celebrate the pause, the deepening economic rift between the world’s two largest economies underscores that the most volatile fault line of the trade war remains unresolved—and potentially widening.

A Fragile Rally? Analyst Warnings

Despite the sharp market rebound, a growing number of economists and strategists are urging caution, warning that the euphoria may be short-lived if not followed by meaningful policy progress. Many are characterizing the surge as a “relief rally” rather than a reflection of fundamental economic improvement.

“This looks like a classic bear market rally,” cautioned Morgan Hill, chief economist at EastBridge Capital. “Unless there’s a comprehensive trade deal in the next 90 days, we could be right back where we started—only with even more volatility, deeper market fatigue, and diminished investor confidence.”

Others point to a broader set of structural concerns that continue to weigh on the global economy. Inflation remains elevated in several advanced economies, with the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) still hovering around 4.3% year-on-year, well above the Federal Reserve’s target. Similarly, eurozone inflation remains stubborn at 3.7%, driven by high energy costs and supply-side disruptions.

Moreover, recent macroeconomic data has been underwhelming. U.S. manufacturing PMI fell to 47.9 in March, indicating contraction for the sixth consecutive month. In the EU, factory activity has also slumped, with Germany’s industrial output dropping 2.1% last quarter, further stoking fears of stagflation. Corporate earnings guidance, particularly in the tech and manufacturing sectors, has also turned increasingly conservative.

“Markets are celebrating a political signal, not an economic turnaround,” said Priya Desai, global strategist at HSBC Holdings. “A 90-day pause is only a temporary Band-Aid unless it leads to tangible outcomes like reduced tariffs, stable supply chains, and renewed trade partnerships.”

Analysts also highlight the potential risk of policy missteps—both fiscal and monetary—if governments misread market enthusiasm as a sign of durable recovery. The Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank are still grappling with rate hikes versus growth trade-offs, and any premature tightening could exacerbate a fragile environment.

Investors are now closely watching for follow-up measures, including diplomatic engagements, policy clarity from the U.S. administration, and responses from other key economies. Until then, the current rally may be walking a tightrope between hope and hard reality.

Conclusion

President Trump’s 90-day pause on tariffs has undeniably delivered a short-term boost to investor sentiment, providing much-needed relief to rattled global markets—particularly in Asia, where economies remain deeply integrated with global trade networks. The sweeping rallies in stock indices from Tokyo to Wall Street reflect the powerful influence of policy pivots in an era of heightened geopolitical uncertainty and economic interdependence.

However, this tactical reprieve appears more symbolic than substantive. China’s exclusion from the temporary truce—alongside its swift retaliatory actions—underscores the fragility of the current détente. Analysts warn that without a comprehensive, multilateral agreement, the world may be simply postponing a deeper and more entrenched phase of the trade conflict. Key structural issues—ranging from supply chain realignment and tariff imbalances to technological sovereignty and currency manipulation—remain unresolved.

As the 90-day clock ticks down, the world will be watching closely to see if this pause leads to genuine diplomatic progress or simply resets the countdown to the next escalation. Businesses, investors, and policymakers alike must navigate the coming months with caution, balancing optimism with realism.

For real-time updates and deeper insights into evolving trade policies, visit World Trade Organization – Newsroom.

For more in-depth coverage and updates on this developing story, visit AP News.

Trump Imposes 125% Tariff on China, Suspends Other Tariffs for 90 Days Amid Global Tensions

Washington: In a significant escalation of the ongoing U.S.-China trade conflict, former President Donald Trump announced the imposition of a 125% tariff on all Chinese imports, marking the most aggressive trade measure against China to date. The announcement was made during a nationally televised press conference on April 9, 2025, followed by a series of official statements from Trump’s campaign and affiliated economic advisors. Trump framed the tariff hike as a corrective response to what he described as China’s “deliberate and sustained disrespect toward global markets and fair trade practices.”

Also Read: China Retaliates Against U.S. Tariff Hikes, Raises Tariffs to 84% Starting April 10, 2025

The tariff, which represents more than a threefold increase from earlier rates of 25% and 30% on selected Chinese goods during Trump’s previous term, is expected to impact over $550 billion worth of annual Chinese exports to the United States. According to data from the U.S. International Trade Commission, China remains the largest source of U.S. imports, especially in electronics, machinery, furniture, and consumer goods. The new tariff structure, if implemented fully, could lead to an estimated $120 billion increase in annual duties paid by U.S. importers, potentially passing higher costs on to American consumers.

Economists warn that such a dramatic policy shift may reverberate across global supply chains, exacerbate inflationary pressures, and intensify economic uncertainty amid already fragile post-pandemic recovery trends. Trump, however, defended the decision by stating, “America will no longer tolerate economic sabotage under the guise of trade. China has taken advantage of our openness for too long.”

At the same time, Trump authorized a 90-day suspension of new tariff increases for over 75 other nations, temporarily lowering the tariff rate to 10% for these countries. This dual policy move is intended to isolate China while opening space for renewed negotiations with the rest of the global trading community.



Reasons Behind the Tariff Hike

The Trump administration justified the imposition of the 125% tariff on Chinese imports by citing persistent concerns over China’s trade practices. Chief among these were systemic intellectual property (IP) violations, state-backed subsidies to Chinese firms, and discriminatory regulations that hinder foreign companies from operating fairly in the Chinese market.

According to a 2023 report by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), U.S. companies have lost an estimated $50 billion annually due to forced technology transfers and IP theft linked to Chinese industrial policies. The Trump team also highlighted that over 60% of Chinese state-owned enterprises receive preferential financing and tax treatment, contributing to unfair global competition.

“China has repeatedly violated global trade norms. We cannot continue to reward bad behavior,” Trump stated during the press conference. He further emphasized that the tariffs are not intended to provoke but to protect U.S. innovation, jobs, and strategic industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, and pharmaceuticals.

In response, China announced an 84% retaliatory tariff on all U.S. exports to China, including critical sectors such as agriculture, automotive, and advanced manufacturing. The Ministry of Commerce in Beijing issued a statement accusing the U.S. of “economic bullying” and warned that these actions “seriously disrupt the global supply chain.”

The retaliatory move puts an estimated $145 billion worth of U.S. exports at risk. Notably, American farmers are expected to bear the brunt of the impact, as soybeans, corn, pork, and dairy products are among the top U.S. exports to China. The Chinese response has triggered renewed fears of a prolonged trade war reminiscent of the 2018–2019 standoff, which led to billions in lost trade and global market volatility.

Market Reactions and Economic Impact

The announcement of the 125% tariff on Chinese imports, coupled with the 90-day tariff suspension for over 75 other countries, triggered immediate volatility in global financial markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average initially plummeted by over 800 points, reflecting investor fears of a sharp deterioration in U.S.-China trade relations. However, markets partially rebounded later in the day as traders responded optimistically to the selective tariff pause. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite surged more than 8%, driven by a rally in tech and multinational stocks expected to benefit from continued access to low-tariff markets outside China.

The energy markets also reacted sharply. Brent crude oil prices dropped below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021, a fall of over 12% in just 24 hours. Analysts linked the drop to fears of declining industrial demand in both China and the U.S., two of the world’s largest energy consumers. This unexpected slump in oil prices also undermined the G7’s price cap strategy on Russian oil exports, adding further complexity to already strained global energy dynamics.

Major financial institutions raised red flags. JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon issued a cautionary statement, warning that prolonged trade disruptions could “shave off 1 to 1.5 percentage points from global GDP growth in 2025.” Similarly, the Bank of England, in its latest risk assessment report, noted that “escalating tariffs and retaliatory measures pose significant downside risks to the fragile post-COVID global recovery,” with Europe and emerging markets most vulnerable due to their trade interdependencies.

Market analysts now estimate that if the tariffs remain in place beyond the 90-day pause, global stock indices could see a sustained correction of 10–15%, and capital flows may shift dramatically away from Asia and toward more insulated markets.

Global Diplomatic Reactions

The global response to former President Trump’s tariff escalation has been swift and complex, reflecting the deep interconnectivity of global trade networks and mounting concern over rising economic nationalism.

The European Union (EU) emerged as one of the most vocal critics. In an emergency session of the EU Trade Council convened in Brussels just hours after Trump’s announcement, member states—with the exception of Hungary—voted to enact counter-tariffs on U.S. goods worth an estimated €18 billion. Targeted products include U.S. agricultural exports (such as corn, beef, and whiskey), processed foods, machinery, and automobile parts. The move signals the EU’s intent to defend its economic interests while avoiding direct escalation.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated:

“We stand for rules-based international trade. The U.S. decision to unilaterally escalate tariffs undermines both the WTO framework and decades of economic cooperation. Europe will respond proportionately, but firmly.”

Hungary’s abstention was widely interpreted as a diplomatic nod to its increasingly close relations with the U.S. under conservative leadership, as well as a sign of its reluctance to fully align with Brussels amid broader EU policy disputes.

In contrast, developing nations across Asia, Africa, and Latin America largely welcomed the 90-day suspension of new U.S. tariffs on their exports. Countries such as Vietnam, Indonesia, Brazil, Kenya, and Bangladesh expressed hope that this diplomatic breathing room would facilitate new trade talks and help avoid collateral damage to their already fragile economies. For example, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade noted that the pause could help preserve nearly $48 billion in annual exports to the U.S., particularly in garments, electronics, and seafood—sectors highly sensitive to tariff fluctuations.

125% tariffGlobal economic institutions have stepped in to urge restraint. Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank (ECB), warned during a special press briefing in Frankfurt:

“A tariff escalation of this magnitude could have systemic implications for global trade and investment flows. It risks fragmenting the global economy into adversarial blocs—something we have not seen at this scale since the Cold War.”

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) issued a revised forecast in light of the developments, projecting that if retaliatory actions expand further, global GDP growth in 2025 could fall below 2.4%, down from the previous projection of 3.1%. The World Bank also signaled that sustained trade tensions could lead to a 2–3% contraction in developing economies’ exports, hitting sectors such as commodities, textiles, and electronics particularly hard.

Diplomatic analysts are now concerned about a polarization of the global trade system, where countries are forced to align with either Washington or Beijing, a dynamic reminiscent of the Cold War’s bifurcated economic order.

A Strategic Pause

The 90-day tariff suspension for non-targeted countries is being widely interpreted by analysts and diplomats as a strategic maneuver by the U.S. rather than a concession. This “pause” offers a critical window for the United States to pursue bilateral and regional trade negotiations—particularly with nations in Southeast Asia, the European Economic Area (EEA), Latin America, and select African partners—while simultaneously reinforcing its tough stance on Beijing.

Trump imposes 125% tariff on china, suspends other tariffs for 90 days amid global tensionsThe Trump-aligned economic advisory group, America First Trade Coalition (AFTC), stated that the pause allows Washington to “realign its trade architecture and incentivize allied supply chains” away from Chinese dependence. By temporarily exempting over 75 countries, including India, Vietnam, South Korea, Mexico, Poland, and Indonesia, the U.S. is clearly attempting to undermine China’s centrality in global manufacturing and reduce its geopolitical leverage.

Trade economists suggest that this tactic could create a wedge between China and its key export partners, effectively isolating it in multilateral trade arrangements. According to data from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, China’s top 20 export destinations account for over $2.5 trillion in annual trade flows, many of which now face incentives to strengthen ties with the U.S. instead.

However, the strategy is not without domestic controversy. Consumer rights groups and major retailers, including the National Retail Federation (NRF) and Consumer Technology Association (CTA), have warned that the tariff hike on Chinese goods—particularly in electronics, home appliances, and apparel—will likely lead to noticeable price increases for U.S. consumers. Smartphones, laptops, televisions, and personal care products could see price hikes ranging from 12% to 35% in the coming months, according to a forecast by Moody’s Analytics.

Yet proponents argue that short-term price increases are a necessary trade-off for long-term economic resilience. Supporters in the manufacturing and national security sectors believe the tariff regime will encourage the re-shoring of critical industries, such as semiconductor fabrication, pharmaceuticals, defense components, and green tech, which have been vulnerable due to overseas supply dependencies.

Former U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, a key figure behind the original 2018 trade war, remarked:

“This is not just about tariffs—this is industrial policy. The goal is to restore strategic autonomy and safeguard American intellectual property from exploitation.”

The broader view among administration insiders is that the 90-day pause offers a diplomatic chessboard, allowing allies to choose sides and giving U.S. negotiators space to craft trade pacts that preserve global alliances while isolating Beijing economically and ideologically.

Conclusion

As the global economy braces for the ripple effects of Trump’s 125% tariff escalation on China, the next 90 days will be pivotal in determining the trajectory of international trade dynamics. With over $690 billion in two-way trade between the U.S. and China in 2023 alone—and more than $3.2 trillion in global trade potentially influenced by these policy shifts—the stakes could not be higher.

Economists warn that the outcome of this “strategic pause” could lead to one of two sharply divergent futures:

  1. Negotiated De-escalation: If the U.S. successfully uses the 90-day window to secure trade deals with allied countries, reconfigure global supply chains, and extract concessions from Beijing on intellectual property, subsidies, and market access, it could mark a historic turning point. The global trade system may evolve into a more resilient and diversified architecture—albeit more fragmented and less dependent on China.

  2. Prolonged Trade Fragmentation: On the other hand, if the tariff hikes harden positions, spark retaliatory measures, and disrupt commodity flows, the world could enter a period of economic decoupling. This would likely lead to elevated inflation, especially in the U.S. and Europe, a slowdown in global GDP growth (already revised down to 2.4% by the IMF), and deeper geopolitical rifts that may persist for years.

Multinational corporations, especially in sectors like consumer electronics, automobiles, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals, are now reassessing risk exposure and pivoting investment strategies. Meanwhile, developing economies are walking a fine line—seeking to maintain favorable relations with both superpowers while maximizing the trade openings created by this conflict.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has called for urgent diplomacy, warning that “the long-term viability of multilateral trade cooperation is at risk.” With the global economy still recovering from pandemic-related shocks, the coming quarter could determine whether nations double down on protectionism or revive multilateralism through compromise and innovation.

For ongoing, real-time updates and expert insights on the evolving U.S.-China trade landscape, refer to Bloomberg’s Trade Policy Tracker.

For detailed live updates and expert analysis, visit The Guardian’s Business Live Coverage.

EU Strikes Back: Slaps Tariffs on €21 Billion Worth of U.S. Goods in Response to Trump-Era Trade Disputes

Brussels, April 9, 2025 — In a significant and pointed escalation of a trade conflict that has lingered for years, the European Union has announced the imposition of retaliatory tariffs on American goods worth an estimated €21 billion. This decisive move marks a direct response to unresolved trade grievances originating from the protectionist policies implemented under former U.S. President Donald Trump.

Also Read: China Retaliates Against U.S. Tariff Hikes, Raises Tariffs to 84% Starting April 10, 2025

The European Commission formally introduced the measure on Tuesday, stating that the imposition of tariffs is fully compliant with World Trade Organization (WTO) guidelines. According to European Union officials, the action is not only proportionate but also necessary to counterbalance the enduring economic damage caused by previous U.S. tariffs. The new duties will apply to a diverse array of American exports, ranging from agricultural products and industrial machinery to high-end consumer goods and luxury items.

Despite diplomatic overtures and ongoing talks under the Biden administration aimed at mending transatlantic trade ties, the European Union’s decision underscores the persistent friction in U.S.-EU economic relations. The announcement signals a sharp downturn in efforts to rebuild trust and cooperation between the two traditional allies.



Background: Legacy of Trump-Era Tariffs

The origins of the current transatlantic trade dispute can be traced back to 2018, when then-President Donald Trump enacted sweeping tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum from a range of U.S. trading partners, including the European Union. Justifying the decision under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the Trump administration argued that such imports posed a threat to national security — a rationale the European Union and other allies strongly contested.

The European Union responded swiftly, condemning the move as a thinly veiled act of economic protectionism that lacked legitimate security justification. In retaliation, the European Union imposed counter-tariffs on a carefully selected group of American exports, including iconic goods such as bourbon, motorcycles, and orange juice, aiming to target politically significant industries within the United States.

Despite these tensions, a temporary breakthrough was achieved in 2021 under President Joe Biden. Both sides agreed to suspend certain tariffs and committed to working together to address global overcapacity in the steel and aluminum sectors — a key concern for both transatlantic partners. However, progress toward a long-term resolution has since stalled, with negotiations faltering over core issues.

EuEuropean Union officials now argue that the United States has failed to take adequate steps to dismantle the foundational structures of the Trump-era tariffs. While the Biden administration has adopted a more conciliatory tone, Brussels maintains that the continued existence of trade barriers and export restrictions is causing ongoing harm to European industries, particularly in the manufacturing and metal sectors.

The current retaliatory action, according to the European Union, is not only a response to economic damage but also a signal of frustration at what it perceives as Washington’s unwillingness to finalize a fair and lasting agreement.

Details of the New Tariffs

The European Union’s newly announced tariff package, which comes into effect immediately, targets a wide spectrum of American exports — a strategic move designed to exert economic pressure while limiting domestic fallout within the bloc.

Among the most affected categories are agricultural goods, with tariffs imposed on U.S.-grown peanuts, rice, cranberries, and sweetcorn. These items represent key agricultural exports from American heartland states, signaling the EU’s intent to hit politically and economically sensitive sectors.

Additionally, industrial and mechanical products are facing new duties, including tractors, heavy machinery components, and various stainless steel goods — all of which are integral to the U.S. manufacturing and engineering sectors. By targeting these items, the EU aims to highlight its ongoing grievances regarding the steel and aluminum tariffs that first triggered the dispute.

The tariff list also includes luxury and consumer goods, such as bourbon whiskey, motorcycles, and cosmetic products — a clear nod to high-profile, brand-heavy American industries that hold significant market presence in Europe.

The tariffs range from 10% to as high as 35%, depending on the specific product category. European Union trade officials stress that the rates have been meticulously calculated to strike a balance between exerting economic pressure on the United States and minimizing adverse effects on European businesses and consumers. According to the European Commission, the package is intended to be “targeted, proportionate, and compliant with WTO obligations.”

This carefully curated list reflects Brussels’ dual strategy: to compel Washington back to the negotiating table, and to demonstrate to both domestic and international audiences that the EU is prepared to defend its economic interests with assertive trade policy when diplomacy fails.

Reactions from Washington and Brussels

The European Union’s decision to impose fresh tariffs has drawn sharp criticism from Washington, with the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) expressing “deep disappointment” over what it described as a unilateral and counterproductive move. In an official statement released late Tuesday, the USTR emphasized that such actions risk unraveling years of cooperative progress and strain the fabric of transatlantic economic ties.

“We remain committed to resolving trade tensions with our European partners through constructive dialogue,” the statement read. “However, today’s action by the EU is regrettable and unhelpful. It undermines our mutual efforts to reach a balanced and forward-looking agreement.”

Officials in Washington argue that since 2021, both sides have taken significant steps to de-escalate trade tensions — including the establishment of the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC), a platform meant to foster cooperation on global trade standards, emerging technologies, and economic security. The Biden administration points to the 2021 suspension of steel and aluminum tariffs as evidence of its goodwill and intent to rebuild trust. However, EU officials counter that the suspension was only partial and not backed by binding legal guarantees.

In stark contrast to the American response, European Commission Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis, who oversees trade policy, stood firm in defending the EU’s latest measures. Speaking at a press conference in Brussels, Dombrovskis described the tariffs as a “measured and proportionate response to the long-standing trade distortions caused by U.S. protectionist policies.”

“The European Union has made every effort over the past four years to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Unfortunately, despite numerous rounds of negotiations, the United States has failed to fully dismantle Section 232 tariffs or mitigate their effects. We have exhausted all diplomatic options,” he said.

Dombrovskis further clarified that the European Union’s response is anchored in international law, citing the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Body (DSB), which had previously authorized limited retaliation in favor of the European Union. He pointed out that the tariffs are designed to align with the scale of economic damage caused to European industries — estimated at €21 billion in lost trade volume since 2018 — and are meant to pressure the U.S. into restoring equitable market conditions.

The diverging statements from Washington and Brussels highlight the fragile state of transatlantic economic diplomacy. While both sides claim commitment to negotiation, their contrasting narratives and continued use of trade tools suggest deeper structural disagreements that may be difficult to resolve in the near term.

Implications for Transatlantic Trade

The re-escalation of trade tensions between the European Union and the United States casts a long shadow over what had been a slow but deliberate effort to rebuild trust and strengthen economic cooperation in the post-Trump era. Analysts warn that the imposition of retaliatory tariffs — and the potential for further countermeasures — threatens to derail years of progress made toward reestablishing a robust transatlantic trade framework.

Beyond the immediate financial implications, the dispute carries the risk of broader diplomatic fallout. Key areas of ongoing collaboration — including technology standards, digital services taxation, climate change policy, and regulatory alignment — could now become collateral damage in an increasingly strained relationship. Efforts to harmonize policies on carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAM) or regulate artificial intelligence, for example, may face new hurdles if economic trust continues to erode.

The timing of this conflict is particularly concerning. With the global economy still grappling with inflationary pressures, persistent supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical volatility — particularly in Eastern Europe and the Middle East — a full-blown trade spat between two of the world’s largest economies could amplify global uncertainty.

“The revival of trade hostilities between the European Union and the U.S. is a setback at a time when coordinated economic leadership is crucial,” said Maria Elena Cavalli, senior trade analyst at the European Policy Centre. “Beyond the direct economic costs, this kind of escalation sends the wrong signal to the global community. It could embolden other actors — such as China or Russia — to adopt more aggressive or self-serving trade strategies.”

Trade experts also caution that businesses on both sides of the Atlantic will bear the brunt of the fallout. European importers reliant on American machinery or agricultural inputs may face increased costs, while U.S. exporters stand to lose valuable market share in the EU — a trading bloc that accounted for nearly $875 billion in transatlantic goods and services trade in 2023 alone.

Should the dispute deepen, it could jeopardize not only short-term economic recovery efforts but also the long-term vision of a comprehensive U.S.-EU trade pact that addresses 21st-century challenges — from digital transformation to green transition.

Next Steps and Outlook

In response to the recent imposition of retaliatory tariffs on €21 billion worth of American goods, the US administration is actively evaluating its options to address and de-escalate the situation. According to senior officials, urgent consultations with EU counterparts are anticipated in the coming days, aiming to prevent further deterioration of transatlantic trade relations.

The European Commission has signaled openness to dialogue but maintains that substantive progress hinges on the complete removal of the United States’ legacy tariffs on EU steel and aluminum exports. These U.S. tariffs, originally imposed in 2018 under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, have been a persistent point of contention. EU officials argue that their removal is essential for restoring fair trade practices and alleviating the economic strain on European industries.

Market analysts are closely monitoring the situation for potential retaliatory measures from Washington. Such actions could risk reigniting a cycle of escalating tariffs reminiscent of the 2018-2020 trade standoff, which had widespread implications for global trade and economic stability. The re-emergence of such tensions could have far-reaching effects, potentially disrupting supply chains and affecting industries on both sides of the Atlantic.

The current impasse underscores the delicate balance both parties must navigate between safeguarding domestic industries and preserving strategic international partnerships. The outcome of the forthcoming negotiations will be pivotal in determining the future trajectory of economic relations and could set a precedent for how similar disputes are managed on the global stage.

As the situation evolves, stakeholders from various sectors—including manufacturing, agriculture, and consumer goods—remain vigilant, understanding that the resolution of this dispute will have significant implications for their operations and the broader economic landscape.

For further details on the recent imposition of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, please refer to the official press release from the European Commission.

China Retaliates Against U.S. Tariff Hikes, Raises Tariffs to 84% Starting April 10, 2025

Beijing, April 9, 2025 — In a sharp escalation of trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies, China announced on Tuesday that it will raise tariffs on a wide range of U.S. imports to an effective rate of 84%, starting April 10, 2025. This retaliatory move comes in direct response to the United States’ recent decision to significantly increase tariffs on Chinese goods—an action framed by Washington as a measure to counter alleged intellectual property theft, unfair subsidies, and national security threats.

The reciprocal nature of these actions has reignited fears of a full-scale global trade war, echoing the tit-for-tat tariff exchanges of the late 2010s. Economists warn that such aggressive trade policy shifts may lead to higher prices, disrupted global supply chains, and weakened investor confidence, potentially derailing fragile post-pandemic recoveries in both developed and emerging economies.The ripple effects could extend beyond bilateral trade, influencing third-party countries caught in the crossfire, especially those heavily reliant on exports. Analysts also caution that prolonged uncertainty may prompt central banks to rethink monetary easing plans, further straining global growth prospects.

Also Read: “Mistake on Top of a Mistake”: China Slams Trump’s 50% Tariff Threat Amid Escalating Trade War


Context: A Trade War Rekindled

The ongoing tariff escalation marks a renewed chapter in the fractious economic relationship between the United States and China, echoing the turbulence of the 2018–2020 trade war, during which over $550 billion worth of goods were subjected to new duties. That earlier conflict reduced global trade volumes by nearly 1.7% in 2019 alone, according to the World Trade Organization (WTO), and shaved 0.3% off global GDP growth. Now, the risk of repeating such damage looms large.

On April 5, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a sweeping 104% effective tariff on over $60 billion worth of Chinese imports, primarily targeting critical industries including:

  • Electric Vehicles (EVs): Additional 60% tariffs, citing overproduction and state subsidies.

  • Semiconductors: Raised to 80% total tariffs, aimed at curbing China’s tech dominance.

  • Solar panels and battery components: Raised by 45–60% to protect domestic green energy sectors.

  • Rare earths and strategic metals: Tariffs imposed at 70% to reduce dependency on Chinese exports.

These measures were framed as part of a broader strategy to strengthen domestic manufacturing under the “Strategic Economic Safeguard Initiative,” a policy endorsed by multiple U.S. allies but met with criticism from free-market advocates.



In swift response, the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China announced an increase in tariffs on a range of U.S. exports to an effective 84%, up from 34%, through the addition of a 50% punitive levy. The targeted goods include:

  • Agricultural exports (soybeans, corn, pork)

  • Liquefied natural gas (LNG)

  • Automotive parts

  • Pharmaceuticals and medical devices

  • Luxury consumer goods

According to estimates by China’s Customs Tariff Commission, these hikes affect over $45 billion worth of annual U.S. exports, and could impact more than 600 U.S.-based companies currently doing business in China.

Beijing described its decision as a “proportionate and necessary safeguard” against what it termed “unilateral and coercive economic practices” by the United States. Chinese officials also warned that more countermeasures—including restrictions on rare earth exports, investment barriers, and digital market access—are under review should tensions continue to rise.


What the Tariff Covers

Although China’s Ministry of Commerce has not yet released the full official list of products affected by the latest tariff hikes, early indications from state media and trade analysts suggest that the new 84% effective tariff rate will target a wide array of American exports—disproportionately affecting sectors that are politically and economically sensitive in the United States.

China retaliates against u. S. Tariff hikes, raises tariffs to 84% starting april 10, 2025Likely Categories and Economic Exposure:

  1. Agricultural Products

    • Soybeans: The U.S. exported over $14.5 billion worth of soybeans to China in 2023, making it the single largest agricultural export. A tariff of this magnitude would make U.S. soybeans significantly more expensive compared to alternatives from Brazil and Argentina.

    • Corn and Wheat: Combined exports to China reached approximately $5.1 billion in 2023, much of it used in livestock feed. China is a top-3 buyer of U.S. corn.

    • Impact: U.S. farmers, especially in Midwest states like Iowa, Illinois, and Nebraska, are likely to see contract cancellations or steep price drops, reigniting fears of an agricultural surplus and subsidy demands.

  2. 🚗 Automotive Components

    • China is both a key supplier and a growing consumer market for U.S. auto parts. The U.S. exported around $2.7 billion in auto components to China last year.

    • Components such as transmission systems, engines, and smart driving modules are likely to face tariff spikes, which could hurt automakers like Ford, GM, and Tesla, all of which have joint ventures or assembly plants in China.

  3. 📱 High-Tech Goods and Electronics

    • Includes semiconductors, microchips, optical instruments, and advanced manufacturing tools.

    • In 2023, U.S. tech exports to China stood at approximately $12.9 billion, with semiconductors alone making up over $6 billion.

    • Tariffs could prompt Chinese firms to further accelerate sourcing from domestic players like SMIC or turn to South Korean and Taiwanese alternatives.

  4. 🥫 Processed Foods and Beverages

    • U.S. exports in this segment—ranging from packaged snacks and dairy products to alcoholic beverages—totaled roughly $1.6 billion in 2023.

    • Higher tariffs could diminish competitiveness for brands like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Kraft Heinz in China’s fast-growing consumer market.

  5. 🧪 Industrial Chemicals and Medical Supplies

    • The U.S. exported around $3.8 billion worth of chemical products and $2.4 billion of medical devices to China last year.

    • New tariffs could lead to supply chain disruptions in China’s healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, though analysts believe China may substitute with EU imports or ramp up local production.

Broader Impact:

Industry experts warn that the tariff spike will disproportionately harm U.S. sectors already strained by high interest rates, supply chain realignments, and global inflationary pressures. The American Farm Bureau Federation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have both raised concerns about lost market access and called for immediate dialogue between the two governments.

This policy is widely seen as a calculated economic counterstrike aimed at U.S. industries with high export dependency on China, many of which are located in politically significant states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.


Official Response from China

In a formal press release issued on April 9, 2025, the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China outlined the rationale behind its sweeping tariff hike on U.S. goods. The statement asserted that the decision was necessary to “safeguard China’s legitimate rights and interests under WTO rules” and to “maintain the balance of international trade, which has been repeatedly disrupted by unilateral actions from the United States.”

The ministry condemned what it described as protectionist economic nationalism emanating from Washington, warning that such measures are harmful not only to bilateral ties but also to global supply chain stability and emerging markets that depend on trade with both superpowers. It called upon the U.S. to “abandon its zero-sum mindset” and return to constructive economic dialogue.

🔒 Expanded Entity List: U.S. Firms Targeted

In a parallel action, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced the inclusion of 12 more U.S. firms into its “unreliable entities list,” citing national security threats and violations of export control laws. This list is part of China’s countermeasure framework that allows it to restrict or ban exports and imports involving certain foreign companies.

Among the newly added firms are:

  • TechCorp Systems Inc. – alleged involvement in supplying components to military-linked institutions.

  • DeltaGrid AI – reportedly used in surveillance systems operating in disputed regions.

  • BioNex Solutions – facing restrictions on biomedical data sharing and clinical trial imports.

These firms will face:

  • Strict licensing for exports to China

  • Tighter controls on participation in joint R&D

  • Prohibitions on recruiting local Chinese talent in sensitive sectors

According to the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), U.S. companies invested nearly $13.5 billion in China in 2024, a number that could significantly drop if bilateral tensions escalate further.

 Escalation Warning

China’s Ministry of Commerce further indicated that additional U.S. firms are under “active review” and could face similar restrictions in the coming weeks, particularly in fields like:

  • Cloud computing

  • Advanced manufacturing equipment

  • Pharmaceuticals involving genetic data

Beijing officials underscored that these actions were “regrettable but necessary” in light of repeated provocations and the breakdown of recent trade dialogues, most notably the suspended Washington-Beijing economic stabilization talks that were expected to resume later this quarter.


Global Repercussions

China’s announcement of sweeping tariff hikes on U.S. goods—raising duties to a cumulative 84%—has sent shockwaves through global financial markets and reignited fears of a full-blown trade war. The ripple effects were felt across Asia, Europe, and even commodity markets, underscoring the deep interconnectedness of modern global trade.

🌐 Reactions from Global Leaders

In Brussels, the European Commission expressed “serious concern” over the escalating tit-for-tat measures between Washington and Beijing. Valdis Dombrovskis, Executive Vice President for Trade, stated in a press briefing that the EU is closely monitoring the situation and warned that “continued unilateral actions risk destabilizing global trade norms and harming the rules-based multilateral trading system.”

Some EU member states, including Germany and France, have called for an emergency session of the World Trade Organization (WTO) to address the growing impasse, fearing spillover effects on European exporters that operate supply chains across both the U.S. and China.

📉 Market Impact Snapshot (as of April 9, 2025):

  • MSCI Asia-Pacific Index: Down 1.7%, led by sell-offs in South Korean and Taiwanese tech firms.

  • Stoxx Europe 600: Fell 1.2%, with Germany’s DAX Index losing over 180 points.

  • Nikkei 225: Dropped 1.5%, with losses concentrated in semiconductor and robotics sectors.

  • Dow Futures: Slipped 0.8% in premarket trading, as investor sentiment turned risk-averse.

🛢️ Commodities React

Global crude oil benchmarks also responded sharply to the announcement:

  • Brent Crude: Down 2.1% to $84.12 per barrel

  • WTI Crude: Down 2.3% to $80.45 per barrel

Analysts cited reduced demand expectations stemming from potential economic slowdowns in both China and the U.S., which together account for over one-third of global oil consumption. A stronger U.S. dollar, triggered by safe-haven demand, further pressured commodities.

💻 Sectoral Shockwaves

  • Technology Stocks: The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) fell 2.8%, with chipmakers like TSMC, NVIDIA, and ASML suffering losses amid fears of retaliatory supply chain disruptions.

  • Manufacturing Giants: Shares of multinationals like Caterpillar, Boeing, and Siemens also dipped on expectations of delayed Chinese orders and potential localization of Chinese procurement.

⚠️ Investor Sentiment

Risk-off sentiment was reflected in rising demand for safe assets:

  • Gold: Rose to a 3-week high of $2,078/oz

  • U.S. 10-Year Treasury Yield: Fell to 3.86%, as investors moved toward sovereign debt

Financial analysts from JPMorgan and Nomura now predict heightened volatility across emerging markets, particularly those heavily dependent on export-led growth models like Vietnam, Malaysia, and Mexico.


Market Reactions: Global Indices Tumble Amid Escalating Trade Tensions

Financial markets responded sharply to the news of China’s retaliatory tariff hike, with volatility spiking across major equity and commodity markets as investors rushed to reassess geopolitical risk.

🔻 U.S. Futures and Equity Markets:

  • Dow Jones Industrial Average Futures dropped 0.9%, or approximately 330 points, indicating bearish sentiment toward cyclical stocks exposed to global supply chains and China’s consumer base.

  • NASDAQ Composite Futures fell 1.2%, hit hardest by weakness in tech giants like Apple, Intel, and AMD, all of which derive substantial revenues from Chinese manufacturing or consumer sales.

  • S&P 500 Futures declined 0.8%, led by losses in industrials, energy, and materials sectors.

🈳 Asian Markets:

  • Shanghai Composite Index: Fell 1.5%, marking its sharpest one-day decline in over a month, driven by fears of counter-retaliation and supply chain constraints.

  • Nikkei 225 (Japan): Down 1.1%, with semiconductor and auto exporters like Sony, Toyota, and Renesas Electronics bearing the brunt.

  • Hang Seng Index: Dropped 1.9%, as Hong Kong-listed U.S.-dependent companies were re-rated lower by analysts amid escalating uncertainty.

🇪🇺 European Pre-market Mood:

  • FTSE 100 futures dipped 0.7%

  • DAX (Germany) and CAC 40 (France) futures declined 0.8–1.1%

These moves reflected fears that escalating trade barriers could trigger a slowdown in global manufacturing, particularly in machinery, auto parts, and precision instruments—sectors where EU firms are major suppliers to both China and the U.S.

🛢️ Commodity Markets:

  • Gold surged to $2,078/oz, its highest in 3 weeks, as investors sought safety amid geopolitical risk.

  • Crude Oil saw broad sell-offs:

    • Brent Crude: Down 2.1% to $84.12/barrel

    • WTI Crude: Down 2.3% to $80.45/barrel

  • Copper and Steel prices slipped on the London Metal Exchange (LME), reflecting anticipated slowdowns in industrial production.

📉 Volatility Metrics:

  • VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) spiked 11% to 21.4, entering “fear territory” after weeks of low volatility.

  • Bond markets saw a rush into U.S. Treasuries and German Bunds, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield falling to 3.86%, indicating growing demand for low-risk assets.


🔍 What This Means Going Forward: Long-Term Economic Fallout on the Horizon

As the tariff war between the U.S. and China intensifies, global economists and policymakers are warning of severe long-term consequences if no diplomatic solution is reached in the near future.

China retaliates against u. S. Tariff hikes, raises tariffs to 84% starting april 10, 2025🧨 Inflationary Risks:

  • Tariffs raise the cost of imported goods for both producers and consumers. For example, agricultural input costs in China are expected to rise by up to 15%, while consumer electronics prices in the U.S. could climb by 8–12% by Q3 2025, according to a report from Oxford Economics.

  • As tariffs inflate input costs for manufacturers, companies may pass the burden to end consumers, thereby stoking core inflation, which remains sticky in both economies.

📉 Risk to Global Growth:

  • The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that the current trade standoff could shave 0.4% off global GDP in 2025 if prolonged.

  • Export-reliant economies like Vietnam, Malaysia, South Korea, and Germany are likely to face supply chain disruptions and demand slowdowns, leading to investment pullbacks and delayed production cycles.

🏭 Risk of Economic Decoupling:

Trade experts caution that the world may be entering a phase of “strategic decoupling” where the U.S. and China build parallel economic ecosystems—each with its own supply chains, tech standards, and trade alliances:

  • China is already accelerating Yuan-based trade settlements with BRICS partners and reducing reliance on Western technologies.

  • The U.S., under its “Strategic Economic Safeguard” initiative, is promoting reshoring and nearshoring, offering tax incentives for domestic chip and EV manufacturing.

This bifurcation risks a long-term slowdown in technological innovation, particularly in areas like AI, clean energy, and 5G, where international collaboration has historically been a key driver.

🎯 Political Stakes Rising:

  • With U.S. midterm elections approaching in late 2026, trade policy is expected to become increasingly politicized. American farmers and exporters—many of whom are now locked out of Chinese markets—may press for relief packages or push for policy reform.

  • In China, leadership is under pressure to demonstrate that it can withstand external economic pressure while continuing its dual circulation strategy—an effort to boost domestic consumption while remaining globally competitive.

🌐 Calls for Diplomacy:

Global institutions including the WTO, IMF, and World Bank have urged both countries to de-escalate and resume trade negotiations. Without intervention, the fragmentation of the global economy—once a theoretical risk—is now becoming a tangible reality with implications for every region, from Sub-Saharan Africa to Eastern Europe.


🔗 Official Source:

For more information, visit the official release on Cadena SER:
👉 China eleva al 84% sus aranceles a los productos estadounidenses

(Chinese-language page, official release from China’s Ministry of Finance)

Indian Stock Markets Tumble on April 9, 2025: Nifty Slips Below 22,400 Amid Broad-Based Selling

Mumbai: On April 9, 2025, the Indian stock markets witnessed a broad-based sell-off, with major benchmark indices closing in negative territory. Investor sentiment was dampened by rising global uncertainties, including concerns over geopolitical tensions and fluctuating crude oil prices. Additionally, profit booking was evident across key sectors following recent rallies, contributing to the downward pressure. The benchmark Nifty 50 index ended the session at 22,399.15, marking a decline of 136.70 points, or 0.61%, compared to the previous close. This correction reflects growing caution among market participants ahead of the upcoming earnings season and key macroeconomic data releases.

Also Read: Indian Stock Market Closes Strong on April 8, 2025: Nifty Surges 374 Points, Midcaps Shine


Key Index Performance: Sectoral Weakness Leads to Broad-Based Market Decline

On April 9, 2025, Indian equity indices experienced a sharp decline, dragged down by persistent selling in financials and banking stocks. The negative sentiment was amplified by weak cues from global markets, continued uncertainty over interest rate hikes by major central banks, and the anticipation of a mixed Q4 earnings season. Profit-taking was also seen in sectors that had recently rallied, adding to the bearish tone.

Index Closing Value Change (Pts) % Change
Nifty 50 22,399.15 -136.70 -0.61%
Nifty Next 50 60,664.60 -142.95 -0.24%
Nifty Financial Services 24,132.65 -168.85 -0.69%
Nifty Bank 50,240.15 -270.85 -0.54%

📈 Nifty 50 Intraday Movement:

  • Open: 22,460.30

  • High: 22,468.70

  • Low: 22,353.25

  • Close: 22,399.15

The Nifty 50 opened slightly lower, in line with global cues, and traded in a narrow range before slipping deeper into the red during the second half of the session. Selling pressure intensified in banking and financial stocks, which carry significant weightage in the index, reflecting investor caution ahead of macro data releases and corporate earnings.

Indian stock markets tumble on april 9, 2025: nifty slips below 22,400 amid broad-based sellingThe Nifty Financial Services index dropped by 0.69%, losing over 168 points, while the Nifty Bank declined by 0.54%, shedding more than 270 points. Weakness in top lenders and NBFCs, driven by concerns over asset quality and a possible delay in rate cuts by the Reserve Bank of India, further eroded confidence.

In contrast, the Nifty Next 50, comprising mid-to-large cap stocks outside the benchmark index, saw relatively milder losses at 0.24%, indicating that broader market sentiment remained cautious but not in panic.

Overall, the movement across indices reflected a consolidation phase in the markets, where investors are adjusting portfolios and rebalancing ahead of key triggers like inflation data, global crude oil price trends, and geopolitical developments.




Top Gainers on NSE: Select Midcaps and Smallcaps Shine Amid Broader Weakness

While the broader markets faced a bearish tone on April 9, 2025, a handful of stocks defied the trend, posting significant gains and catching investor attention. These stocks, largely from the mid-cap and small-cap segments, showcased robust intraday momentum—many even hitting their upper circuit limits.

Symbol LTP (₹) Change (₹) % Change Volume (Lakhs) Value (₹ Cr)
BINANIIND 14.48 +2.41 +19.97% 3.13 0.44
ONEPOINT 55.85 +5.66 +11.28% 153.94 85.37
TECILCHEM 40.16 +3.65 +10.00% 0.32 0.13
KEYFINSERV 401.50 +36.50 +10.00% 3.18 12.42
CURAA 43.93 +3.99 +9.99% 0.00 0.00

🌟 Stock in Focus: ONEPOINT

Among the top performers, ONEPOINT stood out distinctly, not just for its double-digit price appreciation, but also due to extraordinarily high trading volumes. With over 153.94 lakh shares traded and a total traded value of ₹85.37 crore, the stock appears to have drawn strong buying interest from institutional and retail investors alike.

Indian stock markets tumble on april 9, 2025: nifty slips below 22,400 amid broad-based sellingThe surge in volume and value hints at potential company-specific developments, such as:

  • Announcement of strong quarterly earnings

  • Entry into a strategic partnership or acquisition

  • Positive news flow or market rumors

  • Upgrades by brokerage firms or foreign institutional interest

Given this spike, technical analysts may view the stock as entering a bullish breakout zone, especially if it sustains momentum above resistance levels in coming sessions.

🔍 Other Notable Gainers:

  • BINANIIND locked in a 19.97% upper circuit, indicating a resurgence of interest in lower-priced industrial stocks, possibly due to sectoral tailwinds or speculative buying.

  • KEYFINSERV, a financial services firm, rose by 10%, reflecting strong investor confidence, possibly due to expected robust FY25 earnings or restructuring news.

  • TECILCHEM and CURAA followed suit, both hitting near-upper circuit limits, although their relatively low trading volumes suggest more muted institutional participation.

It’s worth noting that stocks like CURAA posted gains without any recorded volume or turnover, suggesting either a lack of sellers or pending listing updates on broader platforms.


Top Losers on NSE: Select Stocks Witness Steep Sell-Off Amid Market Weakness

While the Indian stock market experienced a moderate decline overall, several individual stocks—particularly in the small-cap and mid-cap segments—suffered sharp corrections, some nearing or hitting their lower circuit limits. Investor sentiment remained fragile in certain sectors due to valuation concerns, weak earnings forecasts, and possible profit-booking after recent rallies.

Symbol LTP (₹) Change (₹) % Change Volume (Lakhs) Value (₹ Cr)
GTECJAINX 28.30 -3.15 -10.02% 0.17 0.05
BLUEJET 625.10 -69.45 -10.00% 13.03 82.84
HILTON 63.90 -7.06 -9.95% 3.76 2.48
THEMISMED 115.50 -12.44 -9.72% 3.05 3.60
SGLTL 134.10 -13.60 -9.21% 34.50 46.93

🔻 Stock in Focus: BLUEJET

The most significant drag of the day was BLUEJET, which plummeted ₹69.45, or 10%, to close at ₹625.10. With a traded volume of over 13 lakh shares and a total turnover of ₹82.84 crore, BLUEJET stood out as the heaviest loser in terms of absolute value.

Indian stock markets tumble on april 9, 2025: nifty slips below 22,400 amid broad-based sellingSuch a steep drop could be attributed to:

  • Disappointing financial results or earnings guidance

  • A downgrade by a major brokerage or rating agency

  • Negative news flow, possibly regarding regulations, compliance, or operational issues

  • General profit-taking after a significant rally in recent months

Investors might also be reacting to industry-specific headwinds, especially if the stock is linked to the aviation, infrastructure, or services space—sectors often sensitive to oil prices, inflation, or demand fluctuations.

⚠️ Other Major Losers:

  • GTECJAINX saw a 10.02% drop, albeit on thin volumes, possibly indicating panic selling in a low-liquidity stock.

  • HILTON and THEMISMED witnessed close to 10% declines, which may have stemmed from sectoral corrections or company-specific developments, such as weak quarterly forecasts, regulatory action, or changes in management outlook.

  • SGLTL, another key loser, dropped 9.21%, with a high trading volume of 34.5 lakh shares, signaling active unloading by large participants—likely due to negative market buzz or missed expectations.

These significant cuts signal the heightened risk appetite and volatility in small and mid-cap counters, where sharp moves—up or down—are not uncommon. The sharp losses in these stocks dragged investor confidence, especially among retail participants exposed to these segments.


Market Sentiment and Insights: Cautious Undertones Ahead of Earnings and Global Triggers

The trading session on April 9, 2025, reflected a cautious and watchful market sentiment, with investors refraining from making aggressive bets ahead of critical macro and microeconomic triggers. Despite the lack of panic selling, the undertone remained negative, led primarily by sector-specific concerns and global uncertainties.

🏦 Sectoral Impact: Financials and Banking Under Pressure

The financial services and banking sectors were among the hardest hit, exerting downward pressure on the broader indices. With the Nifty Financial Services index falling 0.69% and the Nifty Bank index slipping 0.54%, it became evident that investor confidence in these segments has been temporarily shaken.

This decline could be attributed to multiple factors:

  • Rising concerns over net interest margin compression amid delayed rate cuts.

  • Fear of asset quality pressure in Q4 results due to rising retail delinquencies.

  • Possible increase in provisions or regulatory updates that could impact sector profitability.

Market experts believe that the underperformance in banking and NBFCs could continue in the near term unless backed by strong earnings surprises or supportive policy statements from the RBI.

📉 Investor Mood: Cautious Optimism Gives Way to Profit Booking

Investor sentiment turned risk-averse as markets brace for the Q4 earnings season, which begins in earnest later this week. Traders and long-term investors alike seemed to adopt a wait-and-watch approach, focusing on:

  • Corporate earnings guidance and commentary

  • Global developments, especially around crude oil prices, which remain volatile due to geopolitical unrest

  • Central bank decisions, including US Fed’s rate trajectory and RBI’s stance in the upcoming policy review

There is also apprehension that any upside surprises in inflation data, either domestic or international, could dampen hopes of a near-term rate cut, thereby tightening liquidity and slowing corporate capex cycles.

📊 Volatility and Technical Picture: Controlled but Watchful

The Nifty 50 traded in a tight band, with an intraday high of 22,468.70 and a low of 22,353.25, signaling subdued volatility during the session. While this reflects relative market stability, it also points to a lack of bullish momentum needed for a breakout above key resistance levels.

  • Resistance Zone: 22,460–22,470 – Sellers consistently emerged at higher levels

  • Support Zone: 22,340–22,360 – Buyers cautiously defended these levels, preventing deeper cuts

The narrow high-low spread suggests that markets are in consolidation mode, awaiting decisive cues. Analysts believe a break above 22,500 or below 22,300 could set the tone for the next directional move.


Conclusion: Markets Take a Breather as Uncertainty Looms Ahead

The Indian equity markets wrapped up the trading session on April 9, 2025, with a mildly negative bias, weighed down by profit-booking in key sectors and a discernible sense of caution among market participants. The Nifty 50 ended 136.70 points lower at 22,399.15, while broader indices like Nifty Next 50, Nifty Bank, and Nifty Financial Services also registered notable declines.

💼 Sectoral Divergence: Banks and Financials Weigh Heavy

The session’s underperformance was largely driven by financial and banking stocks, which succumbed to selling pressure amid concerns over upcoming earnings, interest rate uncertainty, and margin sustainability. Given the heavyweight nature of these sectors within the index, their collective weakness had a magnified impact on the benchmarks.

However, the decline was not uniform across the board. While frontline stocks corrected, selective outperformance in midcap and smallcap counters offered some relief to investors seeking alpha. Stocks like ONEPOINT, BINANIIND, and KEYFINSERV recorded strong double-digit gains, signaling that investors are still willing to take calculated risks in niche and high-potential segments, especially where positive news or earnings momentum is expected.

🌍 Global and Domestic Overhangs Keep Bulls at Bay

Traders opted for a risk-off approach ahead of several critical triggers:

  • The start of the Q4 earnings season, which is expected to reveal sectoral trends and guidance for FY26

  • Uncertainty around global crude oil prices, which remain volatile due to geopolitical tensions and production shifts

  • Anticipation of central bank commentary, especially from the US Federal Reserve and the Reserve Bank of India, which will influence liquidity and interest rate expectations

📈 Outlook: Watchful Consolidation Expected

From a market structure standpoint, the indices appear to be in a phase of consolidation, with clear support and resistance levels emerging. The lack of broad-based panic indicates that investors are not exiting en masse but are instead rotating capital selectively and preserving cash ahead of critical data points.

As earnings kick off and macroeconomic cues become clearer, market direction will likely be event-driven, with increased volatility expected in the short term.


🔔 Investor Advisory:
Given the current environment, discipline and selectivity will be key. Market participants are advised to:

  • Track corporate results and management commentary closely

  • Maintain a diversified portfolio to absorb potential sectoral shocks

  • Avoid over-leveraging during volatile phases

  • Monitor global indicators like US inflation, crude oil, and bond yields, which can influence domestic sentiment

For real-time stock prices, index movements, and detailed market updates, visit the official NSE website.

Delhi’s New EV Policy 2.0: What It Means for the People of the National Capital

New Delhi, April 2025In a bold and unprecedented move toward sustainable urban mobility, the Delhi government has officially unveiled its much-awaited Electric Vehicle Policy 2.0—an ambitious framework designed to slash vehicular emissions and combat the city’s worsening air quality crisis.

Building on the success of its 2020 EV policy, this second iteration introduces stricter deadlines and broader mandates that target the most polluting segments of the transport sector. With wide-reaching reforms impacting petrol and CNG-powered two-wheelers, auto-rickshaws, and even private car ownership norms, the new policy aims not only to modernize Delhi’s transportation infrastructure but also to influence behavioral shifts among residents. At its core, EV Policy 2.0 is about reducing the city’s carbon footprint and achieving a cleaner, quieter, and more sustainable future. The policy is expected to touch the lives of millions of daily commuters and vehicle owners, marking a definitive shift in how Delhiites move through their city.



Two-Wheelers to Go Electric by 2026

One of the boldest reforms under the Delhi EV Policy 2.0 is the complete ban on the registration of new petrol and CNG-powered two-wheelers starting August 15, 2026. This is a monumental step considering that two-wheelers account for nearly 60% of Delhi’s total vehicle population and are among the top contributors to particulate matter emissions in the city.

The government aims for a 100% transition to electric two-wheelers by mid-2026, a goal that underscores the urgency to cut down on localized vehicular pollution. Delivery agents, e-commerce fleet operators, and daily commuters who rely on scooters and bikes will be among the first groups affected—and also among the first to benefit from lower fuel costs and reduced maintenance.

“We’re targeting a 100% transition to electric two-wheelers by mid-2026,” said a senior Delhi government official. “This is essential for tackling local air pollution and creating long-term sustainable habits among citizens.”

Notably, existing petrol or CNG two-wheelers will not be immediately deregistered, but they will face natural attrition due to age-based phaseouts and fewer service options. In addition, the government is expected to offer purchase subsidies, scrappage incentives, and tax exemptions to encourage voluntary upgrades to EVs, ensuring the transition remains inclusive and economically feasible.


🚖 End of the Road for CNG Autos by 2027

Once hailed as a clean alternative to diesel, CNG auto-rickshaws are now being phased out as the city shifts toward zero-emission mobility. Under the new policy:

  • New registrations for CNG autos will cease after August 15, 2025

  • Renewal of existing CNG auto permits will also stop after this date

  • All new auto permits issued post-August 2025 will be for electric variants only

  • A complete ban on CNG auto-rickshaws is expected by December 31, 2027

Delhi’s new ev policy 2. 0: what it means for the people of the national capitalThis dramatic shift is set to impact over 90,000 auto drivers operating across Delhi, many of whom depend on these vehicles for their livelihood. To support them during the transition, the government plans to introduce targeted financial schemes, including:

  • Low-interest loans for purchasing e-autos

  • Retrofitting incentives for existing CNG autos (if technologically viable)

  • Special EV zones with dedicated parking and charging infrastructure for e-autos

The move not only aligns with Delhi’s broader electrification targets but also promises quieter, smoother rides and reduced operational costs for drivers in the long term. By 2027, the streets of Delhi could be free of CNG autos entirely, marking a critical milestone in its fight against urban air pollution.

Private Vehicle Ownership: New Rules to Encourage Green Choices

In a strategic push to rein in fossil fuel dependency in the private vehicle segment, the Delhi EV Policy 2.0 introduces a first-of-its-kind vehicle cap regulation aimed specifically at wealthier households and multi-vehicle owners. According to the new rule:

Any individual or household that already owns two fossil fuel-powered vehicles (whether two-wheelers or four-wheelers) must ensure that their third registered vehicle is electric.

This clause is a direct nudge toward “green ownership” among the city’s upper-middle class, who are typically more likely to own multiple vehicles. It targets not only high-income families but also automobile enthusiasts and collectors, many of whom have largely been outside the scope of past EV-centric regulations.

The rationale behind this policy is twofold:

  1. Reduce the concentration of fossil fuel vehicles per household, which often leads to increased congestion and emissions in residential areas.

  2. Create a behavioral shift where electric vehicles are not just seen as second or third options but as mainstream choices for primary transport.

While the clause does not apply retroactively, any new vehicle registration falling under this category will be monitored through the VAHAN portal (India’s central vehicle registration database). Officials have hinted at future enforcement mechanisms, such as blocking the registration of a third fossil fuel vehicle until proof of EV ownership is submitted.

This measure is expected to drive demand for electric sedans, hatchbacks, and SUVs, especially in the premium and luxury segments where several new EV models have entered the market. It also underscores the government’s intent to make EV ownership aspirational, not just functional.

Garbage Collection to Go Green by 2027

Delhi’s EV Policy 2.0 takes a holistic view of urban sustainability—not just focusing on personal or commercial vehicles, but also on municipal fleet electrification. One of the standout mandates is that all garbage collection vehicles operated by municipal corporations must be fully electric by December 31, 2027.

Currently, most waste collection trucks in Delhi run on diesel or CNG and operate extensively during early mornings and late nights, emitting pollutants directly into residential neighborhoods. These vehicles contribute to both air and noise pollution, making them a key target for decarbonization under the new policy.

“Waste management shouldn’t come at the cost of clean air,” a Delhi government official stated. “By transitioning to electric garbage trucks, we’re not only cleaning the streets—but also cleaning the air we breathe.”

The electrification mandate will cover:

  • Household garbage collection vehicles

  • Larger compactor trucks for municipal landfills

  • Street-sweeping and sanitation vehicles

To support the transition, the government is expected to:

  • Offer dedicated grants and subsidies to municipal bodies and contractors

  • Partner with commercial EV manufacturers for bulk procurement of e-waste trucks

  • Develop charging depots near landfill sites and waste management zones

This move is projected to cut down hundreds of tons of CO₂ and PM2.5 emissions annually, while also promoting quieter and more efficient waste collection operations across all 11 districts of Delhi.

What This Means for You: A Breakdown by User Type

The Delhi EV Policy 2.0 is not just a top-down administrative reform—it’s a change that will touch the daily lives of nearly every citizen. Whether you’re a commuter, a vehicle owner, or a business operator, here’s how the policy could impact you:


🔄 For Commuters: Time to Shift Gears

  • If you’re planning to buy a two-wheeler or auto-rickshaw within the next 12–24 months, it’s wise to begin exploring electric alternatives now. Petrol and CNG options will soon be phased out for registration, and EVs will become the only viable new purchase option post-2026.

  • Expect quieter rides and reduced smog levels, especially in dense areas like Karol Bagh, Lajpat Nagar, and Connaught Place, where traffic congestion is high.

  • The expansion of charging infrastructure and EV subsidies means electric vehicles will likely become more accessible and affordable across income groups.


🚘 For Existing Vehicle Owners: Prepare for New Norms

  • If your household owns two fossil-fuel vehicles, you’ll need to ensure that your third vehicle is electric—a rule that may be enforced through the VAHAN registration portal.

  • The government is likely to roll out scrappage incentives, tax rebates, and low-interest loans to encourage the shift to EVs.

  • Older petrol and diesel vehicles may face stricter fitness tests or restricted entry into low-emission zones in the future.


💼 For Businesses: A Paradigm Shift in Urban Logistics

  • Logistics, food delivery, and ride-hailing companies will need to accelerate fleet electrification or risk operational and licensing limitations in the coming years.

  • The policy presents a major opportunity for e-commerce companies, fleet operators, and startups to innovate with EV-based logistics, especially last-mile delivery.

  • It also opens new revenue streams for:

    • EV charging station providers

    • Battery-swapping startups

    • Electric fleet leasing companies

Bottom line: early movers will benefit from incentives and infrastructure support, while laggards may face operational restrictions and higher compliance costs.

What’s Next? Infrastructure, Affordability & Accountability

While Delhi’s EV Policy 2.0 sets ambitious goals with clear timelines, the path to success hinges on one critical factor: execution. The next 24 to 36 months will be pivotal in determining whether the policy can truly transform Delhi into a model for green urban mobility.

🏗️ Charging Infrastructure: The Cornerstone

A 100% EV transition cannot succeed without widespread, reliable, and fast charging infrastructure. The Delhi government is expected to:

  • Expand the network of public charging stations, especially in residential areas, markets, and parking lots.

  • Promote battery-swapping stations for two-wheelers and commercial vehicles to reduce downtime.

  • Encourage RWAs (Resident Welfare Associations) and private builders to install EV chargers in housing societies.

  • Partner with DISCOMs to offer subsidized electricity tariffs for EV charging, improving affordability.

As of now, Delhi has over 4,000 public charging points, but at least 18,000–20,000 will be needed by 2026 to meet policy targets.

💰 Affordability & Incentives

To make EVs accessible to the masses, especially two-wheeler users and auto drivers:

  • New direct purchase subsidies are likely to be announced soon, complementing existing central FAME-II benefits.

  • Low-interest financing schemes and zero-down-payment options may be extended to gig workers and fleet owners.

  • A scrappage policy could offer trade-in bonuses for surrendering old petrol or diesel vehicles.

🤝 Public-Private Partnerships: A New Mobility Ecosystem

The government has signaled interest in collaborating with:

  • Private EV manufacturers and leasing firms to increase vehicle supply.

  • Startups in mobility tech and battery management to build local innovation capacity.

  • Corporate and retail hubs to create EV-exclusive parking and charging zones.

These partnerships will be essential in scaling up infrastructure and making Delhi an EV-friendly city in both policy and practice.

“Delhi EV Policy 2.0 is more than a roadmap—it’s a declaration that clean mobility is no longer optional. It’s the future,” said a senior official from the Delhi Transport Department.

If executed efficiently, Delhi could join global leaders like Oslo, Amsterdam, and Singapore as a benchmark city in urban electric transformation—setting a precedent for other Indian metros to follow.

, it could place Delhi among the global leaders in urban electric mobility.


🔗 For more information and official updates, visit:
👉 Delhi Transport Department – EV Policy Updates

For more Real time updates, visit Channel 6 Network.