Bihar – The first phase of Bihar Assembly elections has generated significant interest around Bihar SIR voter turnout data, with 121 constituencies recording an impressive 64.66 percent participation according to Election Commission of India figures released at 8:30 pm on Thursday. This remarkable turnout comes after a contentious Special Intensive Revision exercise that resulted in substantial deletions from the state’s electoral rolls.
The Bihar SIR voter turnout represents a significant increase of 9.3 percentage points compared to the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and 8.8 percentage points higher than the 2020 assembly elections in these same constituencies. In fact, this marks the highest voter participation recorded in any state or national election in Bihar since the 2010 state election, based on comparable Assembly constituency boundaries and constituency-level turnout data.
Understanding the Special Intensive Revision Context
To properly analyze the Bihar SIR voter turnout, it is essential to understand the Special Intensive Revision exercise conducted by the Election Commission of India. This comprehensive electoral roll review process resulted in a net deletion of 3.07 million electors statewide between the 2024 Lok Sabha electoral rolls and the final roll after the SIR, representing a 4 percent reduction in the total elector count.
Specifically, the 121 Assembly constituencies that participated in Thursday’s polling experienced a deletion of 1.53 million voters, or 3.9 percent compared to the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. These substantial deletions raised concerns about whether genuine voters had been removed from electoral rolls and whether this would impact overall participation rates.
Absolute Voter Numbers Tell Different Story
Despite concerns about deletions, the Bihar SIR voter turnout analysis reveals a surprising finding: there has been no absolute decline in the number of voters who actually cast their ballots. The Election Commission listed the total number of registered electors for the 121 constituencies at 37.51 million, which is 0.4 percent more than the 37.37 million count in the final SIR roll.
This means that 24.3 million electors cast their votes in Thursday’s polling phase. This figure significantly exceeds the 21.55 million electors who voted in these same constituencies during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, demonstrating that voter participation increased in absolute terms despite the reduction in total registered electors.
Historical Growth Pattern Comparison
Examining the Bihar SIR voter turnout within the context of historical electoral patterns provides valuable insights. Between the 2010 and 2015 assembly elections, the number of electors increased by 21.7 percent in these 121 constituencies, while the number of voters increased by 30.5 percent, showing robust democratic participation growth.
Between the 2015 and 2020 elections, both electors and voters increased at roughly similar rates: 9.2 percent and 9.5 percent respectively. This parallel growth suggested a stabilizing electoral environment with consistent participation patterns.
2025 Election: Divergent Growth Patterns
The 2025 Bihar SIR voter turnout data reveals an interesting divergence. While the number of electors increased by only 1.1 percent due to the SIR deletions, voter turnout increased by 17.1 percent—a rate that falls between the earlier growth rates observed in 2010-2015 and 2015-2020 periods.
Also Read: Tej Pratap JJD Bihar: Powerful Prediction About Party’s Political Future Amid Phase 1 Voting
This divergence is particularly significant because it demonstrates that the number of voters increased at a rate similar to previous elections, even though elector growth slowed dramatically. This pattern suggests that the electoral roll cleaning exercise did not significantly impact actual voter participation on the ground.
Theoretical Validation of SIR Effectiveness
The Bihar SIR voter turnout patterns lend theoretical support to the argument that the Special Intensive Revision did not remove a significant number of actual, active voters from the ground. Instead, the data suggests that deletions were largely confined to voters who had migrated, were registered in multiple locations, or were otherwise inactive participants who had not voted even in previous elections.
This interpretation aligns with earlier analysis conducted when draft SIR electoral roll data was released on August 1, which identified this outcome as a possibility. The exercise appears to have successfully cleaned duplicate and inactive registrations without disenfranchising legitimate voters who actively participate in elections.
Limitations and Caveats in Analysis
While the Bihar SIR voter turnout data provides encouraging signs, certain limitations must be acknowledged. The Election Commission does not publish detailed lists identifying which specific electors turned out to vote, making it impossible to track individual voting patterns with absolute certainty.
Additionally, Bihar’s voter turnout has historically been among the lowest among major Indian states. This suggests that many persons on pre-SIR rolls may not have been active voters, making the pool of potentially affected genuine voters smaller than the gross deletion numbers might suggest.
Implications for Electoral Reform
The Bihar SIR voter turnout experience offers important lessons for electoral reform efforts nationwide. It demonstrates that comprehensive electoral roll revision exercises can be conducted without suppressing actual voter participation, provided the focus remains on removing duplicate, migrated, or inactive registrations rather than legitimate voters.
The success of this exercise in maintaining and even increasing absolute voter numbers while cleaning electoral rolls could serve as a model for similar efforts in other states. The data validates the approach of using technology and systematic verification to improve electoral roll accuracy without compromising democratic participation.
