The All India Mahila Samskrutika Sanghatane (AIMSS) has raised strong concerns over the increasing number of crimes against women, calling it a pressing social emergency rather than a periodic headline issue. In response to this alarming trend, the organisation has launched a month-long nationwide signature campaign demanding stronger legal implementation, gender-sensitive policing, and immediate government intervention. The campaign aims to collect at least one million signatures from citizens across states, urging authorities to prioritise women’s safety as a national commitment instead of leaving it to sporadic legal responses after every violent incident.
The campaign also aims to highlight the gap between legal reforms and their implementation. AIMSS leaders stated that while India has passed several legislations for women’s safety—such as stronger anti-rape laws, anti-trafficking provisions, workplace harassment protections, and stricter penalties for acid attacks—the ground reality remains grim because enforcement is inconsistent.
According to activists, the existence of a law does not guarantee justice if officials lack training, sensitivity, or willingness to act. They emphasised that justice systems must not be shaped by personal biases or social hierarchies, especially when cases involve Dalit women, Adivasi women, or those from economically weaker backgrounds who face harsher intimidation and often have fewer support networks. AIMSS argued that a country that claims legal strength must show real protection in daily life, not just in official documents.
Another recurring issue raised during the launch was the absence of comprehensive rehabilitation systems for survivors of gender crimes. Activists pointed out that many women who report violence face long-term trauma, relocation challenges, financial insecurity, and social stigma. Without psychological counselling, legal assistance, safe shelters, and guaranteed job opportunities, survivors are often forced to withdraw complaints or reconcile with perpetrators for survival.
AIMSS demanded that the government create rehabilitation schemes that provide free counselling, employment quota support, housing provisions for abandoned or victimised women, and public funds for legal assistance. They argued that justice does not end at conviction but continues through rebuilding the life of a survivor, enabling her to live with dignity and independence.
The organisation also criticised society’s tendency to victim-blame women, especially in cases of sexual assault or harassment. AIMSS speakers noted that questions about a woman’s clothing, profession, social behaviour, or the time at which she travelled are repeatedly used to shift responsibility away from offenders. They stressed that such questions have no place in a legal system rooted in constitutional rights.
One activist stated that when courts, police officers, or community leaders entertain victim-blaming narratives, they indirectly legitimise violence. The organisation urged the government to introduce legal penalties for attempts to shame victims publicly or obstruct justice through moral policing, arguing that victim-blaming is not just insensitive—it is a form of psychological violence that pushes women into silence and depression.
Another concern raised by AIMSS was the lack of safe public infrastructure. Leaders pointed out that poorly lit streets, absence of CCTV surveillance in crowded markets, and lack of accessible complaint centres create an environment where crimes are easier to commit and harder to report.
They suggested that women’s safety must be treated as a key factor in city planning and rural development, not as an afterthought. The organisation asked urban bodies to install help kiosks, emergency response systems at bus stops, and GPS-linked monitoring of public transport. They believe that technology, when used responsibly, can act as a preventive force against crimes and ensure immediate intervention when women face threats.
AIMSS further emphasised that women’s safety must extend to digital spaces, where abuse is increasingly sophisticated. They cited examples of cyberbullying, revenge pornography, identity theft, data breaches involving personal photographs, and targeted hate campaigns. Activists argued that most women hesitate to file cybercrime complaints due to social judgment, lack of awareness, or lack of trained cyber police officers who can handle technology-based crimes efficiently.
AIMSS demanded expansion of women-friendly cyber cells, appointment of digital forensic specialists, and public education on legal remedies available to victims of online violence. They reiterated that digital harassment must be treated with the same seriousness as physical assault because its emotional and social consequences can be devastating.
In conclusion, the AIMSS campaign calls for systemic transformation, not symbolic promises. The organisation insists that women’s safety must be integrated into governance, education, law enforcement, and community values. They believe that a million signatures will reflect not just outrage but resolve—proving that women, alongside men, are demanding structural justice.
The campaign challenges governments to move beyond emotional rhetoric and create lasting protective systems. As volunteers mobilise across the country, the movement seeks to redefine safety as a constitutional guarantee that India must uphold with discipline, empathy, and accountability. Through public participation and persistent pressure, AIMSS hopes to build a future where women can live without fear, where justice is swift, and where dignity is not a privilege, but a fundamental right.
AIMSS members allege that crimes against women are not merely acts of individual violence but a symptom of a deeper societal imbalance rooted in discrimination, exploitation, and systemic neglect. The organisation pointed out that sexual assault cases, human trafficking, workplace harassment, and domestic violence continue to rise despite multiple laws and awareness initiatives. Members argued that these crimes are aggravated by slow investigation processes, weak evidence collection, lack of survivor counselling, and failure to ensure safety for victims who approach the police. They believe that without institutional reform, punitive laws alone cannot protect women effectively.
During the campaign launch, AIMSS leaders criticised what they describe as a culture of “reactionary outrage,” where authorities act only when faced with public protests after horrific crimes. They argued that women’s safety cannot depend on outrage-driven governance but requires proactive systems that catch offenders early and create deterrence. They also stressed that prevention must go beyond policing and include educational reforms, community awareness, and safe infrastructure in public spaces. According to AIMSS, emotional solidarity is not enough—society must build functional, gender-just institutions.
Many participants in the campaign spoke about their own experiences of harassment and intimidation, emphasising that crimes against women are not limited to remote areas or night-time violence. They described threats in classrooms, workplaces, public transport, and even online spaces. AIMSS representatives highlighted that cyber harassment and digital exploitation have rapidly increased, targeting women through blackmail, stalking, doctored images, and abusive messages. The organisation argues that without specialised cyber units and sensitised officers, many victims are discouraged from filing complaints, leaving offenders free to repeat crimes.
Demand for Accountability and Gender-Sensitive Policing
One of the central demands of AIMSS is the establishment of gender-sensitive policing backed by strict accountability mechanisms. Activists argue that many cases collapse not due to the absence of laws but because of poor investigation practices. They point out that delayed FIR registration, improper forensic collection, insensitive questioning, and intimidation by police personnel discourage victims from pursuing justice. To address this, AIMSS has proposed specialised training modules for officers handling women’s cases, mandatory timelines for FIRs, and periodic audits on the progress of investigations.
Another demand focuses on the creation of fast-track courts that are truly accessible to survivors and supported by legal-aid cells dedicated to women’s rights. Activists note that many women from rural and marginalised backgrounds do not file complaints because court processes are complicated, expensive, and emotionally traumatising. AIMSS states that unless the justice system supports women at every stage—from complaint to trial—laws remain symbolic. They argue that the courts must not simply deliver punishment but also protect survivors from retaliation by families, communities, or accused individuals.
Community involvement is another pillar of AIMSS’s strategy. The organisation insists that crimes against women cannot be solved through policing alone if communities continue to normalise harassment or shame survivors. Activists want local bodies, schools, colleges, and resident associations to adopt safety pledges and conduct workshops on gender equality. They say that prevention must start early, with boys being taught about consent, respect, and boundaries as part of school curriculum. Without such social change, policing efforts may reduce crimes temporarily, but inequalities will persist.
Signature Campaign as Public Empowerment Tool
The AIMSS signature campaign does not stop at collecting public support—it aims to transform signatures into actionable recommendations that will be presented to state governments, law enforcement agencies, and parliamentary committees. Leaders emphasise that the campaign is a form of democratic participation, giving ordinary citizens a role in shaping policy changes. Volunteers will visit colleges, workplaces, marketplaces, and residential areas to collect signatures, while social media drives will encourage digital endorsements.
The organisation plans to use the data to highlight regions where women express fear or dissatisfaction with policing and legal outcomes. Such information could help authorities identify areas needing urgent safety reforms. AIMSS is also encouraging men to sign the campaign, underscoring that women’s safety is not a gender-exclusive responsibility but a human-rights issue requiring collective action. They believe public participation will force authorities to treat gender crimes as systemic threats rather than isolated acts committed by individuals.
Grassroots participation is expected to be a major strength of the movement. Volunteers from rural regions said that women in villages often face more severe barriers to justice because crimes are dismissed as “family matters” or “community issues” controlled by informal systems like caste panchayats. These practices deter victims and enable perpetrators. The signature campaign therefore aims to bypass informal barriers by directly appealing to formal state institutions, demanding that constitutional rights must override regressive community customs.
The campaign will also collect testimonies from survivors who choose to share their stories anonymously. AIMSS leaders say that these testimonies will not be used as emotional tokens but as evidence of systemic failures that need immediate correction. The organisation’s approach seeks to balance empathy with policy advocacy, ensuring that emotions lead to constructive demands rather than momentary outrage.
At the campaign launch, AIMSS members expressed hope that building public pressure would push governments to integrate women’s safety into everyday governance, rather than treating it as a reactive response to brutal crimes. They stressed that long-term change depends on transforming policing, education, community culture, and public accountability systems. If the campaign meets its goal, it will not only symbolise solidarity but act as a documented demand for structural reforms.
Ultimately, AIMSS’s initiative shows that women’s safety is not a problem of individual behaviour alone—it reflects collective values, administrative priorities, and legal culture. As the campaign gathers signatures across India, it urges society to turn empathy into action and demand institutions that truly protect women. By standing together, citizens can replace fear with justice and transform signatures into social power.
Follow: Karnataka Government
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
