Congress Accuses BJP of Dividing Mumbai and Looting BMC Coffers Ahead of Critical Civic Elections

As Maharashtra prepares for crucial civic elections in 2025, a fierce political confrontation has erupted between the Indian National Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party over the future governance of Mumbai. The Congress has levelled serious allegations against the BJP, claiming the saffron party intends to divide Mumbai and loot BMC coffers instead of addressing pressing civic issues that affect millions of Mumbaikars daily. This accusation has set the stage for what promises to be one of the most contentious municipal elections in recent history.

Also Read: Divide Mumbai and loot BMC

Other: Chennai People Be Ready

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, with an annual budget exceeding seventy-four thousand crore rupees, represents India’s richest civic body and has become the epicentre of this political storm. The stakes are extraordinarily high, as control over the BMC means authority over critical urban infrastructure, public health systems, sanitation services, and educational facilities that serve Mumbai’s eighteen million residents.

Congress Alleges Polarisation Over Progress

Maharashtra Congress chief Harshwardhan Sapkal has launched a pointed attack on the BJP’s campaign strategy, asserting in public statements that Mumbai becomes unsafe under BJP rule and that the ruling party’s primary objective is to divide Mumbai and loot BMC coffers rather than serve the city’s citizens. This allegation reflects deeper concerns about the BJP’s electoral approach in India’s financial capital.

State Congress spokesperson Sachin Sawant has articulated these concerns more specifically, claiming that the BJP consistently employs polarisation politics during every election cycle. He referenced recent electoral patterns, including rallies and slogans that the opposition characterises as divisive, suggesting these tactics are being replicated in Mumbai ahead of the civic polls. The Congress argues that such strategies divert public attention from substantive civic issues like crumbling infrastructure, inadequate healthcare facilities, and persistent flooding during monsoons.

Mumbai Congress president Varsha Gaikwad has intensified this critique, accusing the BJP of spreading divisive rhetoric even during festive seasons. She has urged Mumbaikars to recognise what she describes as deceptive tactics designed to divide Mumbai and loot BMC resources. Her statements emphasise the need for citizens to focus on genuine civic concerns rather than succumb to polarising narratives.

Infrastructure Crisis Versus Political Rhetoric

The Congress has systematically outlined the critical infrastructure challenges facing Mumbai that they believe should dominate electoral discourse. These include the annual flooding that paralyses the city during monsoons, inadequate desilting of drainage systems, deteriorating conditions in civic hospitals and schools, broken sewage networks, insufficient public sanitation facilities, particularly for women, dangerous potholes that have caused fatalities, massive traffic congestion, and mismanagement of garbage disposal systems.

Sawant emphasised that Mumbai, despite being the nation’s financial capital, suffers from severe civic ailments that require urgent attention. He argued that the true priority should be improving municipal health and easing the daily struggles of ordinary citizens rather than engaging in divisive politics. The Congress maintains that discussions about improving sanitation, infrastructure, and public services should take precedence over polarising campaigns that attempt to divide Mumbai and loot BMC resources.

The opposition party has also raised concerns about the builder-politician nexus, contractor corruption, and what they describe as the BMC’s financial decline under the current administrative arrangement. Since the corporators’ terms expired in March twenty twenty-two, the BMC has functioned under a state-appointed administrator, a situation that opposition parties claim has reduced accountability and transparency in civic governance.

BMC’s Electoral Significance and Political Calculations

The upcoming BMC elections carry immense political significance beyond municipal governance. The corporation’s massive budget and administrative reach make it a crucial stepping stone for state-level political ambitions. The twenty seventeen civic polls witnessed the undivided Shiv Sena securing eighty-four seats, closely followed by the BJP with eighty-two seats, and Congress winning thirty-one seats. The political landscape has transformed dramatically since then, with the Shiv Sena split creating two factions and the Nationalist Congress Party similarly divided.

Current political calculations suggest complex alliance dynamics are emerging. The ruling Mahayuti coalition, comprising the BJP, Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena faction, and Ajit Pawar’s NCP, has announced intentions to jointly contest in four municipal corporations within the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, including the BMC. Meanwhile, the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi faces its own internal tensions, with speculation about individual parties potentially contesting independently in certain constituencies.

The Congress’s allegations that the BJP seeks to divide Mumbai and loot BMC coffers must be understood within this complex political matrix. The opposition parties argue that the ruling coalition’s focus on polarisation represents a strategic calculation to consolidate certain vote banks while diverting attention from governance failures. They contend that this approach undermines the democratic discourse necessary for addressing Mumbai’s genuine civic challenges.

Grassroots Strategy and Electoral Preparations

Political observers note that the BJP has intensified grassroots mobilisation efforts in Mumbai, focusing on booth-level management, voter outreach programs, and engagement with local community issues. The party reportedly aims to secure between one hundred forty to one hundred fifty seats in alliance with the Shinde-led Shiv Sena faction. These preparations reflect the high stakes involved in controlling India’s richest municipal body.

However, Congress leaders argue that such organisational efforts should complement, not replace, substantive policy discussions about civic governance. They maintain that the real test for any political formation lies in addressing Mumbai’s infrastructure deficits, improving public service delivery, and ensuring transparent administration of the BMC’s substantial financial resources. The allegation that certain political forces intend to divide Mumbai and loot BMC assets speaks to fundamental concerns about governance priorities.

The opposition has also highlighted what they describe as the BJP’s pattern of shifting major projects and investments from Maharashtra to other states, particularly Gujarat. Congress leaders cite examples of industrial ventures, infrastructure projects, and government offices allegedly relocated, arguing this demonstrates a broader disregard for Maharashtra’s developmental interests. They suggest similar dynamics could affect Mumbai’s civic development if the wrong political forces gain control of the BMC.

Civic Issues Demanding Immediate Attention

Mumbai faces multiple pressing challenges that require urgent municipal intervention. The city’s drainage infrastructure, despite substantial investments, continues to fail during monsoons, causing widespread flooding in residential and commercial areas. The BMC has spent crores of rupees addressing potholes, yet roads deteriorate rapidly, particularly during the rainy season, creating hazards for commuters and contributing to traffic congestion.

Public health infrastructure in civic hospitals requires significant upgrades to meet the needs of Mumbai’s growing population. Municipal schools need better facilities, resources, and teaching staff to provide quality education. Water supply systems require modernisation to ensure consistent availability across all neighbourhoods. Garbage management remains problematic, with inadequate segregation and disposal mechanisms affecting public hygiene and environmental quality.

The Congress argues that these tangible civic issues should dominate electoral discourse rather than polarising narratives. They maintain that any political party seeking to divide Mumbai and loot BMC resources undermines the city’s developmental prospects and betrays the trust of citizens who depend on effective municipal governance for essential services.

Alliance Dynamics and Strategic Positioning

The approaching civic elections have triggered complex negotiations and strategic repositioning among Maharashtra’s political parties. The Shiv Sena faction led by Uddhav Thackeray and the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena are reportedly exploring seat-sharing arrangements, potentially dividing constituencies based on traditional strongholds. This collaboration between the Thackeray cousins, whose relationship remained strained for nearly two decades, reflects the high stakes involved in these elections.

Within the Maha Vikas Aghadi, tensions have emerged regarding alliance strategies for the BMC polls. Some factions within the Congress have expressed interest in contesting independently, while others advocate maintaining coalition unity to effectively challenge the ruling Mahayuti alliance. These internal deliberations reflect broader questions about organisational strength, voter appeal, and strategic positioning in Mumbai’s competitive political landscape.

The Congress’s allegations that the BJP intends to divide Mumbai and loot BMC coffers serve multiple strategic purposes. They frame the electoral contest as a choice between divisive politics and developmental governance, position the opposition as defenders of Mumbai’s civic interests, and attempt to consolidate support among voters concerned about infrastructure and public services. Whether these arguments resonate with Mumbai’s diverse electorate remains to be determined.

Path Forward for Mumbai’s Governance

As the civic elections approach, Mumbai faces critical choices about its governance trajectory. The city requires leadership committed to addressing infrastructure deficits, improving public service delivery, ensuring transparent financial management, and promoting inclusive development that benefits all residents regardless of community affiliations. The allegations and counter-allegations between political parties reflect competing visions for Mumbai’s future.

The Congress’s central claim that certain political forces seek to divide Mumbai and loot BMC resources highlights fundamental questions about electoral priorities and governance values. Should municipal elections focus on polarising narratives or substantive civic issues? Should political parties emphasise community divisions or collective developmental challenges? These questions extend beyond partisan considerations to address the nature of democratic discourse in India’s urban centres.

Mumbai’s citizens ultimately hold the power to determine which political formation governs the BMC. Their decision will shape not only immediate civic services but also longer-term developmental trajectories for India’s financial capital. Whether voters prioritise infrastructure improvements, public health facilities, educational quality, and transparent governance—or respond to alternative electoral appeals—will become clear when election results are announced.

The political battle over the BMC represents more than partisan competition for administrative control. It reflects deeper tensions about urban governance models, the role of municipal bodies in delivering public services, and the relationship between electoral politics and civic development. As Maharashtra prepares for these crucial elections, the allegations that some seek to divide Mumbai and loot BMC coffers underscore the fundamental importance of choosing leadership committed to serving all Mumbaikars through effective, transparent, and inclusive governance that addresses the city’s most pressing challenges while building foundations for sustainable future development.