A prominent consumer rights organisation has accused the Hubli Electricity Supply Company (HESCOM) of allegedly misusing its tariff review process to impose higher electricity charges on consumers. The group claims that the review, which is supposed to evaluate operational costs and service efficiency, is being exploited to justify arbitrary hikes in electricity tariffs, adversely affecting households, businesses, and small industries across Karnataka.
Consumer advocacy groups have pointed out that HESCOM’s alleged misuse of the tariff review process is part of a broader pattern seen across several utilities in Karnataka. They argue that while utilities claim rising operational costs, evidence often shows inefficiencies, wastage, and delayed infrastructure upgrades that do not justify increased tariffs. The consumer group has called for independent audits to validate cost claims before any hike is approved.
According to the organisation, transparency is a key issue in the tariff revision process. Most consumers lack access to clear, understandable information about how tariffs are calculated, making it difficult for them to challenge proposals. The group has demanded that HESCOM provide simplified reports and public summaries of its financials, operational costs, and proposed increases, allowing ordinary citizens to make informed decisions and submit meaningful objections.
Industry experts note that unchecked tariff hikes could have cascading effects on Karnataka’s economy. Higher electricity costs may increase operational expenses for small and medium enterprises, forcing them to reduce workforce or increase prices for goods and services. This, in turn, could impact consumer spending and overall economic activity, making fair and regulated electricity pricing crucial for the state’s growth and stability.
The consumer group has also highlighted issues with HESCOM’s billing practices, including delayed meters, estimated bills, and frequent discrepancies. They argue that increasing tariffs without addressing these systemic problems effectively penalises consumers for inefficiencies that the utility itself has not corrected. The group insists that tariff adjustments should be linked to measurable improvements in service quality and reliability.
Public hearings organised by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) are expected to become a focal point for consumer advocacy. The groups have announced plans to present detailed objections, cost analyses, and case studies from other states to illustrate how tariff hikes can be unfairly imposed. They hope that KERC will consider these inputs before approving any changes, ensuring that consumers are not exploited.
HESCOM has defended its proposal by citing rising fuel costs, maintenance expenses, and the need to modernise the distribution network. Officials claim that the tariff revision is necessary to maintain service continuity and ensure financial sustainability. However, critics argue that the utility has not adequately addressed inefficiencies in energy distribution, such as high transmission losses and outdated infrastructure, which continue to burden consumers unfairly.
Legal analysts have emphasised that if HESCOM’s tariff hike is implemented without proper justification, citizens may have grounds to challenge it in courts. Past cases in Karnataka and other states have seen courts ordering utilities to roll back unfair tariff hikes and compensate consumers. Such legal interventions underline the need for robust regulatory oversight and accountability in public utilities.
Consumer rights activists are also mobilising public campaigns to raise awareness about the tariff review process. They are encouraging citizens to participate in public hearings, submit objections, and demand transparency in utility operations. Social media campaigns, workshops, and informational materials are being used to empower consumers to engage effectively with the regulatory process.
Experts have stressed that utilities like HESCOM must strike a balance between financial sustainability and public interest. While operational costs may rise due to inflation, maintenance, or technology upgrades, any tariff increases must be reasonable, transparent, and linked to tangible benefits for consumers, such as improved reliability, reduced outages, and better grievance redressal.
The ongoing dispute over HESCOM’s tariff proposal highlights the critical role of regulatory commissions in protecting consumer interests. Ensuring that electricity remains affordable, while allowing utilities to maintain and improve services, is central to Karnataka’s energy policy. The outcome of this tariff review will likely set a benchmark for future utility operations, transparency standards, and consumer protection in the state.
Consumer Group Raises Concerns
The consumer group stated that HESCOM’s recent tariff proposal lacks transparency and does not adequately reflect operational realities or consumer interests. According to the complaint, the utility has reportedly presented inflated expense projections and unverified cost components to regulatory authorities, giving the appearance of increased financial need. Members of the organisation argue that this approach could unfairly burden consumers, particularly those from low-income segments who are already struggling with rising living costs.
Representatives of the consumer group urged the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) to carefully scrutinise HESCOM’s submissions and ensure that any tariff revisions are justified, reasonable, and grounded in verifiable data. They stressed that electricity is an essential service, and arbitrary hikes undermine public trust in the power distribution sector.
Alleged Impact on Consumers
According to the organisation, if HESCOM’s proposed tariff hikes are implemented, residential users could see a significant increase in monthly electricity bills, while industrial and commercial establishments may face higher operational costs. The group warned that this could result in ripple effects across the economy, with small businesses potentially passing on increased expenses to consumers and affecting overall economic stability in the region.
Consumer advocacy groups have pointed out that HESCOM’s alleged misuse of the tariff review process is part of a broader pattern seen across several utilities in Karnataka. They argue that while utilities claim rising operational costs, evidence often shows inefficiencies, wastage, and delayed infrastructure upgrades that do not justify increased tariffs. The consumer group has called for independent audits to validate cost claims before any hike is approved.
According to the organisation, transparency is a key issue in the tariff revision process. Most consumers lack access to clear, understandable information about how tariffs are calculated, making it difficult for them to challenge proposals. The group has demanded that HESCOM provide simplified reports and public summaries of its financials, operational costs, and proposed increases, allowing ordinary citizens to make informed decisions and submit meaningful objections.
Industry experts note that unchecked tariff hikes could have cascading effects on Karnataka’s economy. Higher electricity costs may increase operational expenses for small and medium enterprises, forcing them to reduce workforce or increase prices for goods and services. This, in turn, could impact consumer spending and overall economic activity, making fair and regulated electricity pricing crucial for the state’s growth and stability.
The consumer group has also highlighted issues with HESCOM’s billing practices, including delayed meters, estimated bills, and frequent discrepancies. They argue that increasing tariffs without addressing these systemic problems effectively penalises consumers for inefficiencies that the utility itself has not corrected. The group insists that tariff adjustments should be linked to measurable improvements in service quality and reliability.
Public hearings organised by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) are expected to become a focal point for consumer advocacy. The groups have announced plans to present detailed objections, cost analyses, and case studies from other states to illustrate how tariff hikes can be unfairly imposed. They hope that KERC will consider these inputs before approving any changes, ensuring that consumers are not exploited.
HESCOM has defended its proposal by citing rising fuel costs, maintenance expenses, and the need to modernise the distribution network. Officials claim that the tariff revision is necessary to maintain service continuity and ensure financial sustainability. However, critics argue that the utility has not adequately addressed inefficiencies in energy distribution, such as high transmission losses and outdated infrastructure, which continue to burden consumers unfairly.
Officials from the consumer group claimed that past instances of tariff hikes by HESCOM have not always been accompanied by improvements in service quality. Complaints regarding frequent power cuts, delayed grievance redressal, and billing errors remain widespread, further fueling public dissatisfaction. The group argues that any tariff increase should be conditional on demonstrable service improvements and operational efficiency.
HESCOM’s Response
HESCOM officials have responded by stating that all tariff revisions are conducted under the supervision of KERC and follow regulatory guidelines. The utility insists that proposed hikes are necessary to cover rising operational costs, procurement expenses, and infrastructure maintenance. HESCOM has also pointed out that the tariff review process includes multiple stages of consultation and public hearings, allowing consumers to voice objections and feedback.
Despite HESCOM’s assurances, consumer advocacy groups remain sceptical about the process. They allege that technical jargon and complex financial reports make it difficult for ordinary consumers to understand or challenge the proposed tariff increases. The group has therefore called for greater transparency, simplified reporting, and public engagement to ensure that tariff decisions are fair and equitable.
Regulatory Oversight and Public Hearings
The Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission is expected to conduct public hearings on HESCOM’s tariff proposal in the coming weeks. Consumer groups plan to actively participate, submitting detailed objections, independent audits, and data analyses to challenge the company’s claims. Observers note that regulatory commissions play a crucial role in balancing the interests of utility companies and consumers, ensuring that electricity pricing remains reasonable while allowing providers to sustain operations.
Experts in public utilities emphasise that tariff-setting should be transparent, data-driven, and subject to continuous oversight. They warn that misuse of review mechanisms could erode public confidence, encourage consumer protests, and even lead to legal challenges against the utility. Ensuring that electricity remains affordable and accessible is considered essential for social equity and economic growth.
The consumer group’s allegations highlight growing concerns about accountability and governance in the state’s power distribution sector. Citizens, civil society organisations, and regulatory authorities are now focused on scrutinising HESCOM’s practices, demanding that the tariff review process be used solely for legitimate operational assessment rather than as a tool for unwarranted price hikes.
Conclusion: The Need for Accountability and Fairness
The controversy surrounding HESCOM’s tariff review underscores the importance of consumer advocacy and regulatory vigilance. As electricity remains a critical service for households and businesses alike, ensuring that tariff hikes are justified, transparent, and linked to tangible improvements is essential. The coming weeks are expected to be pivotal, as public hearings and regulatory decisions will determine whether Karnataka consumers are protected from unfair financial burdens or subjected to arbitrary increases in electricity costs.
The consumer group has vowed to continue monitoring the situation and mobilising public awareness campaigns, urging citizens to participate in hearings and voice concerns. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for utility governance in Karnataka, reinforcing the principle that essential services must operate with accountability, transparency, and fairness for the people they serve.
Follow: Karnataka Government
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
