Darjeeling MP Raju Bista has reignited the debate on governance and transparency within the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA) by demanding a comprehensive disclosure of all lease details involving GTA-owned properties. His latest letter to the GTA Secretariat — focusing particularly on a 21-room property at Darjeeling More leased for ₹50 lakh per year — has exposed a broader clash between public accountability and administrative opacity in one of India’s most politically sensitive hill regions.
The MP has warned that if the GTA fails to furnish the required details promptly, he will lodge a formal complaint with the Parliamentary Privileges Committee and consider legal recourse, potentially triggering a wider inquiry into the administration’s leasing practices.
The Heart of the Dispute: Leasing of Public Property
At the center of the controversy is a GTA-owned 21-room property located at Darjeeling More, reportedly converted into a luxury facility named The Himalayan Gateway Hotel. The property has been leased for ₹50 lakh per annum for a 30-year term, a figure critics claim undervalues the asset’s market potential given its prime tourist location.
According to Bista’s correspondence, the lease deal lacks transparency and violates basic norms of public administration. He demanded that the GTA release:
- Copies of the lease agreement,
- Details of tender notices and advertisements,
- Information on bidders and bid evaluation processes,
- The criteria used for lease selection, and
- Financial terms, including tax or maintenance obligations.
He has also sought full disclosure of all GTA-owned properties leased or handed over to private parties over the past five years, covering location, tenure, valuation, lessee identity, and approval process.
Unanswered Letters: Administrative Silence Raises Eyebrows
Raju Bista’s demand is not new. His earlier letters to the GTA Secretariat — dated 14 July 2024 (Ref. No. DARJ/GN/2454) and 16 August 2024 (Ref. No. DARJ/GN/2514) — reportedly went unanswered. The renewed push suggests that his patience has worn thin and that he now intends to pursue formal remedies under Parliamentary and legal frameworks if the GTA continues to remain silent.
The MP maintains that, as an ex-officio member of the GTA Sabha, he is entitled to full access to governance and fiscal records, and that the administration’s non-response constitutes a breach of parliamentary privilege and administrative accountability.
Why It Matters: Public Land and Public Trust
The Gorkhaland Territorial Administration, created under a tripartite agreement in 2011, was meant to ensure autonomous self-governance and economic empowerment for the Darjeeling hills. However, leasing public property to private entities without transparent bidding undermines that purpose.
Critics argue that such leases — if executed below fair market value — could represent loss of public revenue, limited local participation, and potential conflicts of interest in administrative decision-making.
In a region where land ownership, local identity, and employment opportunities are politically charged issues, the handling of GTA assets has broad social implications. Transparency in leasing decisions can determine whether locals perceive the GTA as a protector of public interest or as a closed system catering to private beneficiaries.
For context on local governance structures and transparency standards, see:
The Financial Equation: Questions Over Valuation
While GTA officials have stated that the property’s 21 rooms justify a ₹50 lakh annual lease, several industry voices in Darjeeling’s hospitality sector question the math.
- A mid-range 20-room hotel in Darjeeling reportedly generates ₹1–1.5 crore annually in gross revenue during peak tourism seasons.
- Given the 30-year lease term, the total outflow of ₹15 crore (₹50 lakh × 30 years) could be well below the fair market value, depending on future inflation and tourism growth.
- Critics have suggested that such leases require revaluation every 10 years or revenue-sharing clauses to protect public interest.
The lack of competitive bidding or an open tender raises concerns about favouritism and non-compliance with financial regulations under the West Bengal Financial Rules (WBFR) governing public asset management.
(Read WBFR 2005 – Finance Department, Govt. of West Bengal)
Inside the GTA’s Leasing Strategy
According to available GTA records and insider accounts, the administration currently manages or oversees around 26 public properties earmarked for commercial leasing, including tourist lodges, wayside motels, and heritage cottages.
Some examples include:
- Nine trekking cottages along the Maneybhanjyang–Sandakphu route, leased for ₹38.5 lakh per annum, requiring repairs worth ₹6.8 crore.
- Multiple tourist accommodations under the GTA Tourism Department, reportedly leased under public-private partnership (PPP) models.
The GTA defends the leasing policy as a necessary move to monetize under-utilized properties, arguing that maintaining and operating them independently would be economically unsustainable. However, the opacity around bid transparency and local participation has made this justification less convincing.
Political Undertones and Administrative Tensions
The controversy has deep political roots. Since the GTA’s inception, control of hill governance has oscillated between factions loyal to different regional and national political parties.
Raju Bista, a BJP MP representing Darjeeling, has consistently accused the GTA — often aligned with the state’s ruling Trinamool Congress — of “non-transparency and mismanagement.”
His recent statements reflect growing frustration:
“Public property belongs to the people of Darjeeling. Leasing it without public knowledge or proper tendering is not governance — it’s exploitation.”
The GTA, in turn, has accused the MP of politicising administrative matters. Sources within the body suggest that the leases followed “due process” and that the MP is attempting to “score political mileage.”
However, without the publication of documents or audit reports, these claims remain unverifiable — and the public is left to speculate.
Darjeeling MP Raju Bista: Governance and Legal Dimensions
If the GTA fails to comply with the MP’s requests, the dispute could escalate into a Parliamentary Privilege case, as non-response to an elected representative’s inquiry may constitute contempt under Article 105 of the Constitution of India, which protects parliamentary rights and oversight powers.
Additionally, the matter could invite scrutiny from:
- The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), responsible for auditing state and autonomous body accounts.
- The West Bengal Vigilance Commission, which oversees potential irregularities in public asset management.
Relevant legal frameworks include:
- Constitution of India – Article 105
- Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971
Public Reaction: Transparency as a Civic Demand
In Darjeeling and Kalimpong districts, local civic groups and entrepreneurs have begun discussing the issue across social media and community platforms. Many residents support the call for full disclosure, arguing that public trust depends on visible transparency.
Local activists note that the GTA’s funds come from taxpayers and central allocations; hence, all leasing and contracting should be subject to open public scrutiny and RTI access.
Civic transparency advocates like the Darjeeling Citizens’ Forum have previously filed RTIs seeking similar details about property usage, but those applications reportedly received incomplete responses.
For more on citizen transparency tools: Central Information Commission – RTI Portal.
Economic Implications for the Hills
Beyond politics, the controversy touches on the region’s fragile economic recovery. Darjeeling’s tourism industry — disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and recurrent political unrest — is slowly reviving. Properly managed public-private partnerships could attract investment and improve infrastructure.
However, lack of clarity over lease terms can deter credible investors, especially if future administrations question or revoke leases signed under opaque circumstances.
Experts from the Institute for Governance, Policies and Politics (IGPP) note that “predictability and procedural transparency” are vital for long-term regional development.
The Broader Context: Land, Autonomy and Identity
In the hills, land and governance are not merely administrative concerns — they are tied to the Gorkha identity movement and the aspirations for self-determination. The GTA was intended as a step toward greater administrative control for locals, distinct from the plains-dominated state apparatus.
But when the local administrative body itself faces accusations of opacity, it undermines the autonomy project’s legitimacy.
Analysts suggest that the current dispute could set the tone for how future political narratives in Darjeeling unfold — shifting focus from the demand for statehood to the quality of local self-rule.
What Lies Ahead: Possible Outcomes
Raju Bista’s latest warning sets up multiple possible developments:
- GTA Disclosure: The administration might release the requested data voluntarily, restoring credibility.
- Parliamentary Escalation: If not, Bista could raise a breach of privilege motion in the Lok Sabha, leading to formal examination.
- Judicial Path: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) or administrative review may follow if allegations of undervaluation persist.
- Audit Review: The CAG or state audit bodies may initiate a special audit of GTA’s property transactions.
- Political Fallout: With state and local elections approaching, the controversy could become a key campaign issue in the Darjeeling hills.
Expert View: Governance Must Be Seen to Be Clean
Public policy experts stress that in semi-autonomous administrative bodies like the GTA, transparency is not optional.
Dr. Ananya Roy, governance researcher at Jadavpur University, says:
“When local administrations manage assets on behalf of citizens, every rupee and every square foot must be accounted for in the public domain. The absence of transparency breeds mistrust, even when no corruption is proven.”
The GTA controversy illustrates that accountability and autonomy must go hand in hand — otherwise, autonomy risks being reduced to administrative privilege without public oversight.
Conclusion: Transparency as the Test of True Autonomy
The ongoing Raju Bista–GTA property lease controversy encapsulates the challenges of self-governance in the Darjeeling hills. At its core lies a simple principle: public property is a public trust.
If the GTA wishes to maintain its legitimacy and moral authority as the administrative face of the hills, it must demonstrate accountability by disclosing lease details and audit reports transparently.
For the MP, the issue provides a platform to assert his role as watchdog of public interest. For citizens, it serves as a reminder that democratic autonomy without transparency risks becoming an empty promise.
Whether this moment sparks administrative reform or descends into political posturing will depend on how swiftly and sincerely the GTA responds. The hills — and their people — are watching.
External Reference Links
- Right to Information Act, 2005
- The Gorkhaland Territorial Administration Act, 2011
- Constitution of India – Article 105
- West Bengal Finance Rules (WBFR), 2005
- Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG)
- Central Information Commission (RTI Portal)
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
