New Delhi- The Delhi High Court declined an early hearing on a plea seeking a ban on DeepSeek. The court stated that the matter did not require urgent intervention at this stage. The AI chatbot, developed in China, raised privacy concerns among Indian users.
Court’s Stance on Petition for Ban on DeepSeek
The bench included Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela during the hearing. They questioned the necessity of an urgent hearing on this petition. The court stated that if users find the platform harmful, they can avoid using it. The petitioner’s counsel argued that DeepSeek posed significant risks to data security. However, the bench ruled that no immediate action was required at this moment.
Concerns Raised in the Petition for Ban on Deepseek
The petition, filed by advocate Bhavna Sharma, highlighted major cybersecurity and data privacy risks. DeepSeek allegedly leaked sensitive information, including chat histories and backend data. The petition stressed that these vulnerabilities could compromise user privacy and national security. The petitioner urged authorities to take preventive measures before further damage occurred. The issue of data security has gained attention amid rising AI-based threats.
Government’s Position and Previous Court Observations
Earlier, the court granted time for government agencies to review concerns regarding DeepSeek’s operations. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology was asked to present relevant information. Justice Gedela previously noted that AI technology posed risks beyond national boundaries. He emphasized that such concerns were not exclusive to any single country. Authorities continue to monitor the developments and assess the risks involved.
Implications of the Court’s Decision
The court’s decision suggests that not every AI-related case requires immediate judicial intervention. The ruling indicates that legal scrutiny must align with pressing security concerns. This judgment may influence how future AI-related cases are handled in courts. Users must remain cautious while engaging with AI platforms to protect their data. The government may introduce additional regulations to address AI-related security issues.
Public Response and Ongoing Debate on Ban On Deepseek
Legal experts and tech analysts have debated the court’s decision extensively. Some argue that preemptive measures are necessary to prevent security risks from escalating. Others believe that strict AI regulations can hinder technological advancements in the country. The public remains divided over the balance between regulation and innovation. AI-related concerns are expected to increase as more platforms emerge worldwide.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court declined an early hearing ban on the DeepSeek petition, citing no urgency. The ruling highlights the judiciary’s approach toward handling AI-related legal challenges. Users must exercise caution while engaging with platforms that raise privacy concerns. The government may introduce stricter policies to monitor AI applications in the future. The debate on AI security and privacy will likely continue in the coming years.
