Edappadi Palaniswami Demands Full Justice After Verdict in Anna University Sexual Assault Case
Edappadi Palaniswami has once again drawn national attention with his bold statement following the court’s ruling in the notorious Anna University sexual assault case. In a landmark decision, the Chennai Women’s Court sentenced Gnanasekaran to life imprisonment without remission for 30 years and imposed a ₹90,000 fine. This verdict stems from the shocking incident that took place on December 23 last year, in which a student from Anna University was sexually assaulted—a crime that shook Tamil Nadu to its core.
The judgement, though praised by many, has also brought with it fresh political heat. Edappadi Palaniswami, the Leader of the Opposition and AIADMK chief, came down heavily on the ruling DMK government, alleging deliberate efforts to protect other individuals possibly involved in the crime—particularly the mysterious figure referred to as “SIR” in the FIR.
Edappadi Palaniswami Accuses DMK of Shielding ‘SIR’ in Sexual Assault Case
According to Palaniswami, the Stalin-led DMK government worked behind the scenes to shield Gnanasekaran, a person alleged to have close links with the ruling party. He strongly suggested that only Gnanasekaran has been punished while more powerful individuals, including the elusive “SIR”, have been deliberately kept out of the spotlight.
Palaniswami accused the DMK of fast-tracking the case only to prevent deeper investigations that could reveal higher-level involvement. In his social media post on X, he declared, “Even if Mr. Stalin wishes otherwise, that SIR cannot be saved by any ‘Sar’.” His words reflected both anger and political intent, hinting that if AIADMK returns to power, the hidden truths behind the case will come to light.
The ₹90,000 fine imposed on Gnanasekaran has been ordered to be given directly to the survivor, a step that adds a measure of relief but not closure to a case marred by alleged political interference and unanswered questions. Many citizens and political observers feel that the identity and role of the mysterious “SIR” mentioned in the FIR deserve further investigation, and Palaniswami’s statement has reignited public curiosity.
Meanwhile, BJP senior leader Tamilisai Soundararajan welcomed the verdict but echoed a similar sentiment. She insisted that anyone who helped Gnanasekaran—directly or indirectly—must not go unpunished. She pointed out that the question “Who is that SIR?” remains unanswered and mentioned that similar concerns have surfaced in Arakkonam as well.
Edappadi Palaniswami Vows to Reveal Hidden Truths if AIADMK Returns to Power
The AIADMK leader’s statement wasn’t merely political rhetoric—it was a loud call for accountability. He emphasized that the party has always stood by the survivor, amplifying her voice across platforms and ensuring the case was not brushed under the carpet. According to Palaniswami, the credit for this verdict partially goes to public pressure and AIADMK’s persistent demands for justice.
அண்ணா பல்கலை. பாலியல் வழக்கின் குற்றவாளியான திமுக அனுதாபி ஞானசேகரனுக்கு ஆயுள் தண்டனை விதித்துள்ளது சென்னை மகளிர் நீதிமன்றம்.
இந்த வழக்கில் குற்றவாளி திமுக ஞானசேகரனைக் காப்பாற்ற எத்தனையோ சித்து வேலைகளை செய்தது ஸ்டாலின் மாடல் திமுக அரசு.
அத்தனையும் முறியடித்து, மக்கள் மன்றம்…
— Edappadi K Palaniswami-SayYEStoWomenSafety&AIADMK (@EPSTamilNadu) June 2, 2025
His fiery remarks also underline a growing sentiment in Tamil Nadu that political power must not overshadow legal justice. Palaniswami’s post drew massive attention online, with supporters praising his stand and critics questioning the timing and motive behind his remarks. But one thing is clear—the sentence may have been delivered, but the storm is far from over.
Also Read : New Terminal Building at Patna Airport Marks Major Milestone for Bihar’s Growth: PM Modi- May 2025
With AIADMK promising to bring hidden truths to light if voted back to power, and BJP calling for a deeper investigation, the political heat around the Anna University sexual assault case continues to intensify. For now, the survivor has received a symbolic form of justice, but the full picture, as many believe, remains incomplete.
Conclusion :
Edappadi Palaniswami’s bold comments have stirred up new demands for transparency and justice. As public pressure mounts and political voices grow louder, all eyes are now on what unfolds next in this disturbing case.
