Election Commission Pre-SIR Headache in Bengal— The Election Commission of India’s ambitious plan to ensure a transparent and error-free voter roll in West Bengal has hit an unexpected roadblock. Fresh mapping data released ahead of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has revealed that North 24 Parganas and South 24 Parganas — two of the state’s most populous districts — have shown alarmingly low percentages of voter linkage with the 2002 rolls, raising administrative and political concerns across the board.
The mapping, which is a preparatory exercise before the SIR officially begins, showed that only around 45% of voters in North 24 Parganas and 55% in South 24 Parganas could be linked to the 2002 electoral list. The numbers indicate that a significant portion of Bengal’s electorate will now have to undergo document verification afresh, a process both time-consuming and politically sensitive.
According to sources from the Chief Electoral Officer’s (CEO) office in Kolkata, this low linkage is expected to increase verification workload exponentially in these districts, potentially leading to delays, disputes, and even voter exclusions if not managed efficiently.
For context, both these districts together account for over 1.5 crore voters — nearly one-fifth of Bengal’s electorate.
Election Commission Pre-SIR Headache in Bengal: What Is the Pre-SIR Mapping Exercise?
The Election Commission conducts a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) every few years to maintain the integrity and inclusiveness of voter rolls. As part of the pre-SIR process, each voter is cross-referenced against the 2002 electoral roll to identify continuity and authenticity.
If a voter or their direct family member (father, mother, or spouse) appeared in the 2002 roll, the individual automatically qualifies as a legitimate voter, eliminating the need for further documentation. However, if no link is found, the voter must produce one of 11 specified documents — ranging from Aadhaar cards to birth certificates — to retain their name on the rolls.
This process, while aimed at accuracy, becomes complicated in regions with high population mobility, migration, or boundary changes, as is the case in the 24 Parganas districts.
Low Linkage Sparks Alarm in Bengal’s Election Offices
The low percentage of voter linkage in North and South 24 Parganas has alarmed officials. “These are not small administrative units — these two districts hold a massive voter population. Even a 5% verification gap translates into lakhs of voters needing document scrutiny,” a senior official from the CEO’s office said.
In contrast, several other districts have performed much better. Murshidabad, Howrah, and Purulia have recorded around 70% linkage with 2002 rolls, while Hooghly stands close to 69%.
The contrast underscores how urbanization, migration, and data inconsistencies have created hurdles for the two Parganas districts, both of which have experienced significant demographic changes over the past two decades.
Why Linkage Matters: Preventing Duplication and Ensuring Inclusion
The linkage mechanism is designed to achieve two key goals:
- Prevent duplication or ghost entries — ensuring voters are not registered multiple times under different names or addresses.
- Protect genuine voters from deletion — voters or families appearing in 2002 records automatically qualify as authentic citizens.
Without linkage, large numbers of citizens could face bureaucratic hurdles, especially in rural or low-income areas where record-keeping is inconsistent. Election officers worry that this could lead to erroneous deletions, delays, or disenfranchisement if awareness and outreach are not handled sensitively.
For more context on electoral reforms and voter inclusion policies in India, you can visit the Election Commission of India’s official site: https://eci.gov.in.
Factors Behind the Low Voter Linkage
Experts attribute the dismal linkage numbers in both 24 Parganas districts to a mix of demographic, administrative, and social factors.
1. High Migration and Population Movement
North and South 24 Parganas are major migration corridors — both internal (from rural to urban areas) and cross-border. The growth of satellite towns, industrial hubs, and informal settlements since 2002 means a large portion of today’s voters simply did not reside in these areas two decades ago.
2. Urbanization and New Settlements
Since 2002, both districts have undergone rapid urban expansion, with new residential colonies, slums, and peri-urban belts forming around Kolkata. Residents of these new zones would naturally have no prior linkage.
3. Data Errors and Administrative Overlaps
Spelling errors, mismatched names, or missing family identifiers during roll digitization often break linkage chains. A minor name variation (e.g., “Chakraborty” vs. “Chakrabarti”) can cause mismatches in automated linkage algorithms.
4. Poor Record Retention
Many families have not preserved old voter cards or proof of enrolment. In rural pockets, voter records from 2002 are often unavailable or illegible.
5. Boundary Changes and Ward Reorganization
The redrawing of constituency boundaries and the creation of new administrative units have disrupted historical voter linkages in both 24 Parganas districts.
Political Reactions: Trinamool, BJP Trade Accusations
Unsurprisingly, the revelation has triggered a political storm in Bengal.
The ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) has accused the Election Commission of “creating unnecessary panic” among voters, alleging that the mapping system could unfairly target marginalized communities.
A senior TMC spokesperson said, “The 24 Parganas districts have a large migrant and minority population. Many of these people didn’t live here in 2002. That doesn’t make them illegitimate voters. The EC must ensure no citizen loses their right due to outdated mapping criteria.”
The opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), however, has seized on the data to raise concerns about illegal entries in voter lists, particularly in border areas like Basirhat and Bongaon. “This proves what we have been saying for years — Bengal’s voter rolls are full of irregularities. The EC should clean up the lists to ensure fair elections,” said BJP state president Sukanta Majumdar.
Independent political observers warn that the issue could become another flashpoint in Bengal’s long history of contested elections, much like the National Register of Citizens (NRC) debate that dominated northeastern India.
Administrative Challenges Ahead
Election officers in both districts now face a daunting logistical challenge. With millions of voters requiring document verification, local polling officials, Booth Level Officers (BLOs), and supervisors will need to process huge volumes of paperwork under tight deadlines.
According to EC norms, the SIR process involves:
- Door-to-door verification of voter details.
- Collection of necessary proof documents.
- Hearings for objections and claims.
- Continuous public display of draft rolls.
In districts like North 24 Parganas, where population density exceeds 2,500 persons per sq km, this process can easily overwhelm staff and resources.
To prevent chaos, the Election Commission is reportedly considering deploying additional verification teams and mobile document camps across high-density zones.
Civic Concerns and Fear of Disenfranchisement
Civil society groups have expressed concern that poor and marginalized voters could bear the brunt of this verification drive. Many daily-wage earners, migrant workers, and elderly citizens may lack the required documentation to prove 2002 linkage or residence history.
“Documentation poverty is a real issue in rural Bengal. Many legitimate voters have lost papers due to floods, displacement, or illiteracy. The EC must adopt a compassionate approach,” said Ananya Chatterjee, a member of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR).
To ensure fairness, several advocacy organizations are urging the EC to conduct awareness campaigns and provide legal assistance to those facing documentation challenges.
For voter education resources and documentation guidelines, you can refer to the National Voters’ Service Portal: https://www.nvsp.in.
Possible Solutions Under Review
To manage the situation, experts suggest the Election Commission consider several remedial steps:
- Extending the SIR timeline in low-linkage districts.
- Deploying additional manpower to handle verification backlogs.
- Using AI-based name-matching tools to identify valid linkages missed due to spelling errors.
- Simplifying acceptable document criteria, especially for rural and migrant populations.
- Setting up district-level grievance redress cells to handle wrongful deletions or rejections swiftly.
Additionally, the Commission is reportedly in discussions with the Union Home Ministry and the Registrar General of India to synchronize voter records with National Population Register (NPR) data for cross-verification.
The Broader Political Impact
The pre-SIR linkage findings could have far-reaching consequences ahead of the 2026 Bengal Assembly elections. With over 7.6 crore total voters statewide, even small errors in voter rolls could affect seat outcomes in several swing constituencies.
The 24 Parganas districts, which together send nearly 66 MLAs to the Assembly, are politically decisive regions. Any perception of large-scale voter deletion or manipulation could inflame tensions and prompt street-level protests.
Observers also note that these revelations come amid heightened national focus on electoral integrity and transparency, with opposition parties alleging bias in election management across several states.
For broader analysis on voter roll reforms in India, read this Observer Research Foundation (ORF) report: https://www.orfonline.org/research.
Experts Warn Against Politicizing the Process
Political analysts caution against turning the linkage issue into a partisan battle. “This is fundamentally an administrative data problem, not a political conspiracy. Both ruling and opposition parties must work together to ensure genuine voters aren’t excluded,” said Professor Biswanath Chakraborty, a political scientist at Rabindra Bharati University.
He added that the Election Commission’s credibility will depend on how transparently it manages this verification drive. “Bengal’s political climate is already polarized. Even minor lapses in verification can spark major unrest,” he warned.
Way Forward: Balancing Accuracy with Inclusion
As the Election Commission prepares to roll out the Special Intensive Revision, it faces a delicate balancing act — ensuring the voter rolls are both accurate and inclusive. The 24 Parganas findings serve as a wake-up call about the limitations of backward-linkage methods and the importance of modern data systems.
Digitizing voter histories, improving coordination between local bodies, and building a stronger grievance system are essential steps toward a transparent and trustworthy electoral process.
Conclusion: Bengal’s Democratic Test Ahead
The revelations from North and South 24 Parganas highlight not just a technical issue but a broader test for Bengal’s democratic institutions. Ensuring that every eligible voter’s voice counts — without exclusion, delay, or discrimination — will determine the credibility of the 2026 polls.
While the Election Commission has maintained that no voter will be unfairly dropped, the logistical and political challenges ahead remain formidable. As one senior officer remarked, “Data verification is not just about names on paper — it’s about trust in democracy itself.”
External reference links for further reading:
- Election Commission of India – Official Website
- National Voters’ Service Portal
- Observer Research Foundation – Research Reports
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
