Humayun Kabir Kingmaker Claim: Suspended Trinamool Congress (TMC) MLA Humayun Kabir has made headlines by declaring that he will emerge as a “kingmaker” in the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections. His bold claim—that no party will cross the majority mark and that his new political outfit will hold the balance of power—has sparked debate across Bengal’s political landscape. This essay explores Kabir’s statement, the context of his suspension, the electoral math, and the broader implications for democracy in West Bengal.
Kabir’s Kingmaker Assertion
Kabir announced that he would contest 135 seats under a new party to be formally launched on December 22 at Berhampore. He argued that neither the ruling TMC nor the BJP would cross the 148‑seat majority threshold in the 294‑member assembly, making his support indispensable for government formation.
This is a striking claim, especially given his suspension from TMC for defying party discipline and his controversial involvement in laying the foundation of a mosque modeled on the Babri Masjid in Murshidabad.
For official electoral references:
Humayun Kabir Kingmaker Claim: Political Context
Kabir’s suspension reflects the internal tensions within TMC, which has faced challenges from both BJP and Left‑Congress alliances. His decision to remain an MLA despite suspension suggests he intends to leverage his legislative position while building his new party.
He hinted at alliances with Congress and CPI(M), with CPI(M) leader Mohammed Salim reportedly taking responsibility for talks. However, AIMIM rejected any alliance, calling Kabir’s overtures “politically suspect.”
Electoral Math and Strategy
Kabir’s estimate that no party will cross 148 seats is based on the assumption of a fragmented mandate. His strategy appears to be:
- Contesting in Murshidabad and other districts where he has influence.
- Seeking seat‑sharing arrangements with Congress and Left parties.
- Positioning himself as a broker of alliances in a hung assembly.
For official references on assembly composition:
Human Cost and Governance Concerns
Kabir’s rise also highlights the human cost of political instability:
- Citizens face uncertainty about governance.
- Farmers and workers are caught in bureaucratic processes like Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
- Block Level Officers (BLOs) face immense stress during voter verification.
For BLO responsibilities:
Border Security and Selective Application of SIR
Kabir questioned why SIR is being conducted in Bengal, Assam, and Kerala but not in other border states. He argued that border protection is the responsibility of central forces like BSF and ITBP, not state‑level voter verification drives.
Government references:
Technology and Transparency Issues
Kabir raised concerns about the AI app used to identify duplicate voters, questioning its origin, data sources, and transparency. This reflects broader anxieties about the use of technology in democratic processes without clear accountability.
For IT governance:
TMC’s Response
TMC leaders dismissed Kabir’s claims as “daydreaming”. State general secretary Arup Chakraborty mocked him, saying he should focus on saving his security deposit rather than imagining himself as a kingmaker.
This response underscores TMC’s confidence in its electoral strength and its attempt to downplay Kabir’s challenge.
Broader Implications for Democracy
Kabir’s announcement raises important questions:
- Can suspended leaders realistically build new parties that influence state politics?
- How does selective application of electoral processes affect public trust?
- What safeguards exist to ensure transparency in voter verification and technology use?
Relevant constitutional reference:
Conclusion
Humayun Kabir’s claim of becoming a kingmaker in 2026 reflects both ambition and political calculation. While his suspension and controversies cast doubt on his credibility, his strategy of contesting 135 seats and seeking alliances could disrupt Bengal’s electoral balance.
Ultimately, the incident highlights the need for transparent electoral processes, strong witness protection, and accountable governance. Democracy thrives not on bold claims but on institutions that safeguard citizens’ rights and dignity.
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
