Concerns over stray dogs took center stage in the Karnataka Assembly as at least a dozen MLAs voiced alarm over what they described as a growing menace near the Vidhana Soudha. Lawmakers expressed frustration about the increasing number of stray dogs in and around the legislative complex, claiming the situation posed health and safety risks to both members and staff. Some members even shared personal experiences of near-misses and attacks, pressing the Assembly Speaker to initiate immediate steps for a canine-free zone. The emotional appeals underscored a mix of genuine concern and political theatrics.
Several MLAs recounted specific incidents where stray dogs reportedly chased security personnel, drivers, and even visitors to the Vidhana Soudha. One legislator described how a colleague narrowly avoided falling while trying to evade a group of strays, emphasizing that such events could have serious consequences in a high-security area. These narratives brought a personal dimension to the debate, making it more than just a bureaucratic concern and pushing the Speaker to address the matter urgently.
The issue also reignited the larger conversation about Bengaluru’s stray dog population, which has been a point of contention for years. The city, despite multiple sterilization drives, continues to face challenges in keeping the canine population under control. MLAs argued that if the capital cannot manage its strays in such a critical administrative area, it sends a poor message about the state’s ability to enforce civic management in other regions.
One MLA suggested setting up a dedicated dog shelter far from the Vidhana Soudha, where the captured dogs could be kept in humane conditions. The proposal included a plan for regular veterinary care, food, and water, which would ensure the animals were not harmed. However, others warned that this might only temporarily shift the problem unless preventive measures were implemented simultaneously.
Some lawmakers raised the legal angle, pointing out that any action must comply with the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and relevant Supreme Court rulings. They stressed that any misstep could invite legal challenges from animal rights groups, which have been vigilant in monitoring municipal actions across the country.
A few members drew comparisons with other Indian states and international cities that have successfully managed stray populations. They cited examples of cities where dog shelters, adoption programs, and public education have drastically reduced incidents of stray attacks. These examples were put forward as potential models for Karnataka to adapt.
There was also discussion about public responsibility in stray dog management. MLAs noted that feeding strays near government buildings often leads them to congregate in such areas, creating potential hazards. They suggested designated feeding zones away from sensitive premises to avoid conflicts while still ensuring animal welfare.
The BBMP’s past performance in handling strays was scrutinized, with legislators accusing it of failing to meet sterilization targets. Budgetary constraints, shortage of trained veterinary staff, and lack of proper infrastructure were cited as key reasons for the gap between planning and implementation. These points fueled calls for stronger accountability measures.
Call for municipal action and humane solutions
Several legislators highlighted the lack of effective municipal measures to control the stray dog population in central Bengaluru, especially in high-security zones like the Vidhana Soudha. They argued that while the issue of stray animals is widespread in Karnataka, the state’s administrative hub should be prioritised for strict control. The Speaker was urged to coordinate with the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) and animal welfare boards to implement safe and humane solutions. The debate sparked public reactions, with some citizens criticizing the focus on a specific area while broader urban stray issues remain unresolved.
Following the Speaker’s directive, the Animal Husbandry Department officials acknowledged the urgency of the situation but cautioned that capturing and relocating the dogs from the Vidhana Soudha area would require meticulous planning. They explained that sudden removal could cause disruption within stray packs, leading to more aggressive behavior in surrounding areas. The officials emphasized that any action must be gradual and supported by sterilization and vaccination drives to prevent the problem from recurring in a few months.
In the days following the debate, civic activists and animal welfare organizations reacted strongly to the Assembly’s discussions. While some supported the lawmakers’ concerns about safety, many accused them of adopting a reactionary approach rather than addressing the root causes of stray dog proliferation. These groups argued that indiscriminate removal or relocation could lead to ecological imbalance and suggested that large-scale sterilization programs, supported by increased funding and community engagement, would offer a more humane and lasting solution.
The BBMP Commissioner, responding to the heightened attention, announced that a detailed survey of stray dog populations in and around Vidhana Soudha would be conducted. This would include mapping their feeding spots, movement patterns, and identifying key breeding areas. Officials promised that the data would guide a phased intervention plan, with an initial focus on sterilization, vaccination, and removal of garbage dumps that often attract stray packs.
Meanwhile, security personnel working at Vidhana Soudha reported that while most strays were non-aggressive, the occasional incidents of barking, chasing, and territorial behavior created discomfort among visitors and staff. Guards noted that stray dogs often entered the complex during quieter hours and found shelter in shaded corridors and gardens, making them harder to detect until they were already near key entry points.
Animal behavior experts brought a different perspective to the discussion, noting that aggressive stray behavior is often a result of human interaction, such as teasing, feeding without responsibility, or sudden changes to their habitat. They suggested that the Assembly consider introducing guidelines for staff and visitors on safe coexistence with stray animals, combined with strict enforcement of feeding regulations to prevent dependency and territorial aggression.
During the discussions, some MLAs expressed skepticism about the BBMP’s capacity to deliver on promises, citing the city’s history of incomplete or delayed civic projects. They questioned whether the municipal body could effectively manage such a sensitive task without political pressure and consistent monitoring. This skepticism was compounded by previous cases where funds allocated for animal control programs were reportedly underutilized or diverted to other projects.
The debate also brought forth concerns about the safety of tourists and visiting dignitaries to the Vidhana Soudha. Lawmakers highlighted that the state capital often hosts international delegations, and stray dog incidents could damage Karnataka’s image on a global stage. Some members recalled past instances where foreign guests had to be escorted quickly due to the presence of aggressive strays near entry points, calling it an embarrassment for the government.
Meanwhile, opposition members accused the ruling party of raising the issue now only because it affected the Assembly premises, despite stray-related complaints being widespread across residential neighborhoods. They alleged that ordinary citizens have been facing the same dangers for years without similar urgency being shown. This accusation sparked a heated exchange in the House, with ruling members defending their record and promising to address the issue comprehensively.
Several MLAs pushed for the creation of a permanent on-site animal control unit within the Vidhana Soudha complex. This specialized team would be tasked with regular patrols, monitoring animal movement, and coordinating with municipal and veterinary services when interventions are required. The proposal also included the use of CCTV surveillance to track stray dog behavior patterns.
Public health officials weighed in, warning that the presence of unvaccinated stray dogs in crowded areas posed a potential risk of rabies transmission. They recommended that all captured dogs undergo immediate vaccination, and that awareness campaigns be run for staff and visitors on how to handle stray encounters. They stressed that prevention is always cheaper and safer than emergency response after an incident.
By the end of the session, the Speaker reiterated that the matter would be taken up as a priority in coordination with relevant departments. While he stopped short of announcing an immediate clearance operation, he instructed that temporary safety measures—such as increasing security presence at vulnerable entry points—be put in place until a long-term plan was finalized. This closing statement ensured that the debate’s momentum would continue into subsequent Assembly discussions.
Animal rights activists push back
Animal welfare activists have countered the calls for removal, insisting that stray dogs in the area are mostly vaccinated and sterilized. They cautioned against knee-jerk measures that could lead to inhumane practices, calling instead for adherence to the Animal Birth Control (ABC) rules and public awareness campaigns. For now, the Speaker has assured that the matter will be examined, balancing MLA safety concerns with animal rights considerations.
Several MLAs expressed concerns that ignoring the issue could have political consequences, as public safety in prominent areas like the Vidhana Soudha is closely tied to perceptions of governance. Opposition members hinted they might raise the matter outside the Assembly to pressure the ruling party into swift action.
Animal welfare NGOs continued to stress that the focus should be on long-term measures like sterilization and vaccination rather than relocation. They reminded lawmakers that removing dogs from one area often results in new dogs moving in, a phenomenon known as the “vacuum effect,” which has been documented in urban animal management studies.
In response, some legislators proposed a collaborative approach between the BBMP, NGOs, and the police to create a monitoring system. This would include mapping dog populations in the central area, tracking sterilization status, and deploying quick-response teams to handle aggressive incidents.
The Speaker noted that while immediate measures might be necessary, they should not compromise animal welfare laws. He directed the concerned departments to prepare a report on the number of strays in and around the Vidhana Soudha and suggest actionable solutions within a stipulated time frame.
Ultimately, the debate highlighted the ongoing tension between ensuring public safety and respecting animal rights. While no final decision was made, the issue has now been formally placed on the Assembly’s agenda, ensuring it will continue to receive attention in upcoming sessions.
Follow: Karnataka Government
Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More
