Mamata Banerjee Unveils Expanded OBC List in West Bengal Assembly: Tackling Misinfo on Religion-Based Reservations

Mamata Banerjee Unveils Expanded OBC List:  In a decisive address to the West Bengal Legislative Assembly on June 10, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee presented the interim report of the West Bengal Commission for Backward Classes (WBCBC), detailing the addition of 76 new castes to the state’s Other Backward Classes (OBC) list. This comes in response to a 2024 Calcutta High Court (HC) ruling that invalidated OBC certificates issued since 2010, citing religion-based reservations. Banerjee emphatically countered such claims, asserting that the entire process is grounded in empirical backwardness, not religion. The cabinet move expands OBC representation and also reinforces the state government’s appeal before the Supreme Court.

A Judicial Backdrop: Calcutta High Court’s 2024 Verdict

On May 22, 2024, the Calcutta High Court struck down the inclusion of 77 communities in the OBC list, observing that religion appeared to be the “sole criterion” for their classification. Notably, the judgment highlighted that between 2010 and 2012, 42 newly listed OBCs — of which 41 were Muslim — appeared to have been accorded reservation based chiefly on religion. Similarly, 35 additional Muslim-dominated communities were included in 2012 under the Trinamool Congress government’s revised list, prompting legal scrutiny.

The court’s findings referenced the binding precedent of the Supreme Court’s 1992 Indra Sawhney (“Mandal”) verdict, which mandates that caste-based reservations must be based on backwardness alone, and prohibits religion from being a determining factor. Declaring that such criteria were at odds with constitutional principles, the Calcutta HC pronounced the existing OBC certificates null and void, adversely affecting job seekers and welfare beneficiaries.

Supreme Court’s Intervention: A Temporary Breather

Following the High Court’s decision, the West Bengal government appealed to the Supreme Court, requesting a stay on the invalidation. On March 18, 2025, the government informed the apex court of its intention to conduct a fresh, comprehensive survey to redefine OBC classes scientifically. The Supreme Court accepted this proposal and deferred the matter to July, granting the state a three-month window for completion .

Scientific Overhaul: How the New OBC List Emerged

Commission-led Survey Efforts

In compliance with the Supreme Court’s directive, Mamata Banerjee’s administration tasked the WBCBC to conduct a benchmark survey combining empirical data and objective field assessments across numerous communities. The Commission scrutinized socio-economic indicators—such as income, literacy, land access, and social disadvantage—to identify backwardness, avoiding any reference to religious identity .

Atri Mitra from The Indian Express reported that the Commission initially proposed a list comprising 140 communities. These were then sub-classified into:

• OBC-A: 49 communities deemed more backward.

• OBC-B: 91 communities assessed as relatively less backward.

• Additionally, ongoing surveys of around 50 communities were still underway .

The state Cabinet formally approved the inclusion of 76 of these new communities, augmenting the existing 64 castes, establishing a potential OBC roster of 140 .

Assembly Address: A Rebuff to Accusations

In the Assembly, Mamata Banerjee launched an assertive counter to allegations from political adversaries, particularly the BJP, that her government was indulging in religion-based reservations.

“Some people are trying to campaign that the state government is providing reservations on the basis of religion, which is baseless,” she said .

Banerjee clarified:

• The OBC-A/B classification resulted from a rigorous survey via WBCBC.

• Inclusion was driven solely by backwardness—income, education, social disadvantage—not religion .

• This transparent process was conducted under Supreme Court’s time-bound mandate.

According to Mumbai-based UNI, she expressed concern over the disintegration caused by the High Court’s cancellation, which left beneficiaries uncertain and anxious .

Political Tussle: Opposition Disapproval and Walkout

The Assembly session turned volatile after Banerjee laid the report. BJP’s Leader of the Opposition, Suvendu Adhikari, sought to question her, but the Speaker chose to adjourn the House prematurely. This enraged BJP MLAs who staged a protest and a walkout.

Adhikari accused the CM of opportunist appeasement politics ahead of state elections, alleging that the revised OBC list had unfairly excluded Hindu communities while favoring minorities . He decried the proceedings:

“Without any agenda and prior intimation to the House, the West Bengal chief minister … gave a wrongful statement … because the assembly polls are knocking the door and she is doing appeasement politics” .

He further alleged suppression of opposition voices:

“We raised our voices strongly … but he [the Speaker] refused to listen and adjourned the House within minutes. This is unethical, violation of judiciary and humiliation of the opposition.”

Legal Stakes: Heading Back to the Supreme Court

With the Assembly’s approval and a survey-backed OBC list in place, the state has presented it as a corrective measure to address the High Court’s concerns. West Bengal’s legal team has confirmed that the revised list will form part of their reply to the Supreme Court in July, once all survey findings are finalized .

The apex court’s July hearing represents a critical juncture. A favorable ruling could reinstate all 140 communities and validate the process, whereas rejection might lead to fresh legal injunctions impacting jobs, education seats, and existing certificates.

Socio-Political and Administrative Implications

Restoring Benefits for 140 Communities

The reinstatement of OBC status holds substantial significance:

• Public Jobs: Work opportunities rely on reservation.

• Education: Enhanced access for hundreds of thousands of students.

• Welfare Schemes: BMI, scholarships, and rural development schemes tied to OBC recognition.

Many individuals who lost OBC certificates post-High Court ruling risked losing access to public sector employment and secure enrollment in professional courses.

OBC-A vs. OBC-B Differentiation

Sub-grouping backward classes helps achieve finer equity:

• OBC-A: for severely disadvantaged groups.

• OBC-B: for communities that are backward, but less so.

Such tiered reservation acknowledges intra-class disparities and aligns with constitutional principles. However, critics argue imbalance could emerge if sub-categories remain unevenly represented.

Election-Year Context

With West Bengal’s Assembly elections looming, the opposition has painted the list as politically engineered to consolidate minority votes. Mamata Banerjee, aware of electoral dynamics, maintains that reforms are survey-driven, not vote-driven. She stressed the academic integrity of the WBCBC’s findings .

Curbing Disinformation

Banerjee further emphasized the dangers of misleading narratives that allege “religion” as the reason behind inclusion. She warned that such campaigns, especially on social media, could polarize communities . Notably, the Economic Times quoted her saying, “OBC status isn’t about religion, it’s about backwardness.”

Mamata Banerjee Unveils Expanded OBC List: Expert Reactions and National Echoes

Nationally, West Bengal’s approach reflects a wider trend: caste-based reservation systems focusing on nuanced classifications backed by empirical data.

• The Supreme Court reaffirmed in 2024 that reservation cannot be religion-based .

• Other states (like Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu) continue evolving OBC lists through empirical surveys and bespoke sub-categorization .

Process under Scrutiny: WBCBC’s Methodology

Critics have questioned:

1. Scientific Rigor: Did the Commission use robust, peer-reviewed methods?

2. Transparency: How public was the data collection?

3. Political Influence: Were certain communities prioritized?

Supporters counter that the Commission’s survey aligns with constitutional stipulations. Legal experts note that involving a statutory commission ensures procedural safeguards and scientific objectivity, unlike the earlier HC-flagged process .

Looking Ahead: Supreme Court’s July Hearing & Policy Fallout

With the state having delivered its revised OBC list, attention shifts to the Supreme Court hearing.

Key questions before the Court include:

• Is the survey rigorous enough to eliminate religious bias?

• Does the sub-classification adequately mirror socio-economic gradations?

• Is there procedural consistency with Indra Sawhney and related constitutional doctrines?

A favorable verdict would reinstate reservation rights and set a replicable model for empirical, transparent OBC identification. A setback could prolong legal limbo, causing renewed anxiety among applicants and necessitate fresh assessments in 2025–26.

Conclusion: A Turning Point for West Bengal’s Reservation Policy

Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s unveiling of a newly expanded, empirically driven OBC list is both a political gambit and a procedural course-correction. It symbolizes a vigorous attempt to decouple caste-based reservation from religious identity and restore social justice connectivity for deprived communities.

Key Developments at a Glance

Why This Matters

• Legal Precedence: The case could broaden or restrict the scope of how empirical data and commissions shape quota decisions.

• Social Equity: Restoration of benefits for over 140 backward communities may reduce socio-economic inequality.

• Political Stakes: The timing and assertions around the OBC list have triggered fierce debate, particularly around minority representation and electoral benefit.

Voices from the Debate

• Mamata Banerjee: Emphasized data-driven, religion-neutral allocations.

• Suvendu Adhikari (BJP): Criticized the list as politically motivated, claiming Hindu communities were omitted.

• Judiciary: High Court and Supreme Court laid out constitutional guardrails, warning against religion-based quotas and insisting on objective backwardness.

Final Word

As the Supreme Court readies to review West Bengal’s revised OBC list in July, the debate extends beyond state politics into constitutional design. The assembly’s actions underscore an emerging model of data-based, commission-led inclusion—perceivably more defensible in court and ethically equitable. Whether this model gains wider acceptance depends on judicial validation, survey integrity, and sustained public scrutiny.

Official & Government Sources

1. West Bengal Commission for Backward Classes (WBCBC)

   • http://www.wbcbc.gov.in/

   • (Official site for data, notifications, and caste status updates in West Bengal.)

2. West Bengal Legislative Assembly

   • https://wbassembly.gov.in/

   • (Access Assembly debates, member profiles, and current legislative actions.)

3. Government of West Bengal – Department of Backward Classes Welfare

   • https://anagrasarkalyan.gov.in/

   • (Provides updated OBC lists, certificates, policy briefs, and scheme details.)

4. Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (Government of India)

   • https://socialjustice.gov.in/

   • (Includes guidelines on reservation policies, Mandal Commission, and constitutional mandates.)

5. Supreme Court of India – Cause List & Orders

   • https://main.sci.gov.in/

   • (Check hearing schedules, past judgments including the Indra Sawhney case, and state petition status.)

6. Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) – Reservation Policy Overview

   • https://dopt.gov.in/

   • (Official guidelines on reservation in jobs, caste criteria, and constitutional constraints.)

7. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) – Mandal Commission Case

   • https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1363234/

   • (Sets constitutional basis for caste-based reservations without religious connotation.)

8. Calcutta High Court May 22, 2024 OBC Judgment (Summary & Full Text via Casewatch)

   • https://www.barandbench.com (search “Calcutta HC OBC May 2024 judgment”)

   • (Detailed judgment invalidating post-2010 OBC certificates on constitutional grounds.)

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More