Manipur: In a significant political development, Manipur Chief Minister N Biren Singh has tendered his resignation, a move that comes amid escalating political unrest and mounting calls for a change in leadership. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the state’s political landscape, reflecting deep-seated tensions within the ruling party and the broader socio-political environment.
N Biren Singh, who has been at the helm since March 2017, has faced increasing pressure in recent months. In October 2024, reports emerged of a ‘leaked letter’ purportedly signed by 19 BJP MLAs, sparking speculation of a rebellion against his leadership. The letter highlighted internal dissent and dissatisfaction with Singh’s handling of various state affairs.
Further compounding the challenges, in January 2025, the Communist Party of India (CPI) called for Singh’s resignation, stating that his apology for the ethnic conflict in the state, which claimed more than 250 lives and rendered thousands homeless, was insufficient. The CPI emphasized that accountability and substantial action were necessary to address the grievances arising from the conflict.
Throughout his tenure, Singh has navigated a complex political terrain, including managing ethnic tensions and internal party dynamics. His resignation underscores the intricate challenges of governance in a state marked by diverse communities and interests.
The resignation of Manipur CM N Biren Singh opens a new chapter in Manipur’s political narrative. As the state anticipates the appointment of a new leader, the focus will be on addressing the underlying issues that have contributed to the current unrest. The coming days will be crucial in determining the direction of Manipur’s political future and the strategies employed to foster unity and development in the region.
In conclusion, the resignation of Manipur CM N Biren Singh amid political unrest and calls for leadership change marks a significant shift in Manipur’s political landscape. This development highlights the challenges of governance in a diverse and dynamic state, underscoring the need for responsive and inclusive leadership to navigate the complexities inherent in such a milieu.
