New Delhi – The Delhi Police security unit has written to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) regarding Arvind Kejriwal’s ‘Z plus’ security cover. Currently, MHA Reviews Kejriwal’s ‘Z Plus’ Security following his recent electoral defeat in Delhi. This development has sparked political discussions on security protocols for former leaders.
Delhi Police Seeks MHA’s Decision
The security unit of Delhi Police has officially communicated with the MHA, requesting a review of Kejriwal’s security status. Currently, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader is under ‘Z plus’ security, which includes an elite protection detail. However, his defeat in the Delhi elections has prompted authorities to reassess whether this level of security remains necessary.
Factors Influencing the MHA Reviews Kejriwal’s ‘Z Plus’ Security
Several factors will play a role in the MHA’s decision regarding Kejriwal’s security cover. These include:
- Threat Perception Analysis: Security agencies will evaluate potential threats to Kejriwal based on intelligence inputs.
- Precedents and Policies: The government follows established guidelines for providing security to political figures based on risk assessments.
- Resource Allocation: Security forces must balance protection duties with broader public safety priorities.
Understanding ‘Z Plus’ Security Cover
‘Z plus’ security is one of the highest protection levels provided to VIPs in India. It consists of a strong security contingent, including National Security Guard (NSG) commandos or elite police forces. The cover also includes:
- A team of nearly 55 security personnel, including armed commandos.
- Bulletproof vehicles and advanced surveillance measures.
- Round-the-clock protection at residences and during travel.
Political Reactions to the MHA Reviews Kejriwal’s ‘Z Plus’ Security
The decision to reassess Kejriwal’s security has triggered varied political reactions. AAP leaders argue that security should not be linked to electoral results, emphasizing that threats remain unchanged. Meanwhile, opposition parties believe that security decisions should align with real-time threat assessments rather than political considerations.
Security Considerations for Former Chief Ministers
In India, former chief ministers often receive security protection based on their perceived risk. Some leaders continue to receive high-level security even after leaving office, while others see reductions based on threat evaluations. The MHA will likely consider past cases before making a final decision on Kejriwal’s security.
Also Read: RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat to Visit Bihar on March 6
Potential Outcomes of the MHA’s Decision
The MHA has three possible options regarding Kejriwal’s security:
- Retaining ‘Z Plus’ Cover: If intelligence reports indicate a high-level threat, his security may remain unchanged.
- Downgrading to ‘Z’ or ‘Y Plus’ Cover: A reduced security detail could be assigned if threats are deemed moderate.
- Complete Withdrawal of Security: If officials find no substantial risk, his security could be significantly reduced or withdrawn.
Public Safety vs. Political Security
While VIP security is essential, it also involves the effective use of national security resources. Many critics argue that security personnel should focus on broader public safety rather than excessive political security. However, others stress that leaders facing credible threats should receive adequate protection.
Final Decision Awaits MHA Review
The Ministry of Home Affairs will assess all relevant factors before making a final decision. Security experts and intelligence agencies will contribute to this evaluation. Ultimately, the decision will be based on the principle of ensuring safety while optimizing resource utilization.
Conclusion
Arvind Kejriwal’s security status is now under review following his election loss in Delhi. The MHA will determine whether to retain, reduce, or withdraw his ‘Z plus’ cover based on security assessments. While the political debate over VIP security continues, the final decision will prioritize national security policies and real-time threat evaluations.
