New Delhi – PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech emerged as a defining moment during the Operation Sindoor debate, as the Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered a comprehensive response to hours of parliamentary discussion. The address specifically countered US President Donald Trump’s repeated claims about mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, while revealing crucial details about India’s military operations against Pakistani terror infrastructure.
During his powerful intervention, PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech emphasized that no world leader had instructed India to halt its military operations. This categorical denial directly challenged Trump’s public statements about his role in ending the cross-border strikes, establishing India’s sovereign decision-making in national security matters.
Direct Confrontation with Trump’s Mediation Claims
The PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech included detailed revelations about conversations with US Vice President JD Vance during the critical period of May 9. Modi disclosed that while Vance had called multiple times, he was unable to take calls due to crucial security meetings regarding the ongoing operations.
According to the PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech, Vance informed the Prime Minister about Pakistan’s plans for a major attack. Modi’s response was unequivocal: if Pakistan proceeded with such intentions, it would face severe consequences. The Prime Minister declared India’s readiness to respond with overwhelming force, stating they would “fire cannonballs against their bullets.”
Pakistan’s Desperate Pleas for Ceasefire
PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech revealed shocking details about Pakistan’s desperate attempts to end Indian strikes. The Prime Minister disclosed that Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations contacted his Indian counterpart with pleading requests: “Bas karo, bahut mara… stop the attack.”
This revelation in the PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech demonstrated Pakistan’s inability to withstand sustained Indian military pressure. Modi emphasized that Pakistani forces were brought to their knees following Indian strikes across different corners of their territory, highlighting the operation’s devastating effectiveness.
Also Read: “How did this happen?”; says Priyanka Gandhi On Pahalgam Attack
Massive Destruction of Pakistani Military Assets
The PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech disclosed unprecedented details about India’s defensive capabilities during Operation Sindoor. Modi revealed that Indian defense systems successfully destroyed approximately 1,000 Pakistani drones and missiles mid-air, showcasing the country’s advanced anti-missile and anti-drone technologies.
This information from the PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech highlighted India’s technological superiority in neutralizing Pakistani retaliation attempts. The massive scale of interceptions demonstrated both Pakistan’s aggressive intentions and India’s preparedness to counter such threats effectively.
Historic Decision on Indus Waters Treaty
PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech announced a landmark decision regarding the Indus Waters Treaty, which the government put in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack. Modi characterized this move as rectifying a “big blunder” committed by India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru.
The PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech included sharp criticism of the original treaty terms, noting that Nehru granted Pakistan rights to 80 percent of waters from rivers originating in India. Modi questioned this diplomatic arrangement, asking what kind of negotiation would give a larger share to the recipient country rather than the source nation.
Sharp Attack on Nehru’s Water Diplomacy
During the PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech, Modi detailed how India’s identity stems from the Indus River, yet Nehru allowed the World Bank to determine water-sharing arrangements. The Prime Minister criticized the treaty that allocated 80 percent of water rights to Pakistan while leaving only 20 percent for India.
The PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech emphasized India’s new stance that “blood and water cannot flow together,” signaling a fundamental shift in India’s approach to water-sharing agreements with Pakistan following terror attacks on Indian soil.
Congress Leadership Critique and Internal Politics
PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech included pointed criticism of Congress party dynamics, specifically referencing the absence of prominent leaders like Shashi Tharoor and Manish Tewari from the Operation Sindoor debate. Without naming individuals directly, Modi suggested that some Congress leaders were prevented from participating in parliamentary discussions.
This section of the PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech highlighted internal Congress politics, questioning why leaders who consider themselves significant were excluded from such crucial national security debates.
Opposition’s Contradictory Stance on Military Operations
The PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech concluded with sharp criticism of opposition parties for their contradictory positions on military operations. Modi accused them of finding new excuses to oppose every military action, from surgical strikes to airstrikes to Operation Sindoor.
The Prime Minister noted in his PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech that when previous operations occurred, opposition parties questioned their effectiveness. However, when Operation Sindoor was halted after achieving objectives, they criticized the government for stopping too early, demonstrating their perpetual opposition regardless of circumstances.
National Unity Against Terrorism
The PM Modi Parliament Monsoon Session Speech emphasized that terrorists and their masterminds were distressed by India’s decisive action, while some domestic political elements appeared to share their anguish. Modi concluded that the entire country was observing these contradictory positions with amusement, highlighting the disconnect between opposition politics and national security interests.
