West Bengal Election Commission Controversy 2025: In November 2025, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee raised sharp objections to the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to hire 1,000 data entry operators and 50 software developers on contract and to set up polling booths inside private housing complexes. Her letter to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar questioned the necessity, legality, and timing of these moves, especially during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

This controversy has become a flashpoint in Bengal politics, highlighting tensions between the state government and the central poll panel over electoral transparency, fairness, and administrative autonomy.

2. West Bengal Election Commission Controversy 2025: Mamata Banerjee’s Objections

Mamata Banerjee argued that:

• District administrations already have trained personnel capable of handling data entry and electoral tasks.
• The CEO’s directive to outsource work to external agencies undermines the authority of district offices.
• Setting up polling booths in private housing complexes compromises fairness and creates discriminatory distinctions between privileged residents and the general public.
• The timing of the request‑for‑proposal raises doubts about whether the exercise is being undertaken at the behest of a political party to serve vested interests.

Her letter emphasized that polling stations have traditionally been located in government or semi‑government institutions to ensure neutrality and accessibility.

3. The Context: Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Electoral Rolls

The SIR is a massive exercise aimed at updating voter rolls before the 2026 Assembly elections. It involves:

• Distribution of 7.64 crore enumeration forms across households.
• Verification of voter details by Booth Level Officers (BLOs).
• Digitisation of collected data.

The process has already faced challenges, including BLO workload pressure, uncollectable forms, and reported deaths linked to stress. Mamata’s objections add another layer of controversy to an already strained exercise.

4. Concerns Over Outsourcing Data Work

The ECI’s move to hire contractual data staff has raised questions:

• Why outsource? District offices already employ competent professionals.
• Risk of bias: External agencies may be influenced by political interests.
• Transparency issues: Outsourcing could reduce accountability.

Mamata argued that if urgent hiring is needed, District Election Officers (DEOs) are empowered to undertake such recruitment themselves.

5. Polling Booths in Housing Complexes: A Question of Fairness

Perhaps the most contentious issue is the proposal to set up polling booths inside private residential complexes. Mamata warned that:

• This violates established norms of neutrality.
• It privileges wealthy residents while excluding poorer voters.
• It risks creating a divide between the “haves and have‑nots.”

Traditionally, polling booths have been located in schools, colleges, technical institutes, and government offices within a two‑kilometre radius of voters. Shifting them to private complexes could undermine accessibility and fairness.

6. Political Accusations and Suspicion

The Trinamool Congress (TMC) has repeatedly accused the Election Commission of colluding with the BJP to disenfranchise genuine voters under the pretext of the SIR exercise. Mamata’s letter echoed this suspicion, questioning whether the EC’s moves were politically motivated.

This reflects a broader narrative in Bengal politics, where electoral administration itself becomes a contested arena.

7. BLOs and the Human Cost of SIR

The controversy also intersects with the plight of Booth Level Officers (BLOs), who are under immense pressure to complete verification and digitisation tasks. Reports of BLO deaths linked to overwork have already sparked outrage. Mamata has argued that the SIR should be halted until BLOs receive proper training and technological tools.

Her criticism of outsourcing data work indirectly highlights the strain on existing staff and the need for systemic reform.

8. Governance and Federalism Issues

At the heart of the controversy is a question of federalism and administrative autonomy:

• Should the central Election Commission override state administrative structures?
• Does outsourcing undermine the authority of district administrations?
• How can neutrality be ensured in polling booth locations?

These questions go beyond West Bengal, touching on the balance of power between state governments and the ECI across India.

9. Broader Implications for Electoral Transparency

The controversy has implications for:

• Public trust: Voters may lose confidence in the fairness of the process.
• Electoral participation: Accessibility issues could discourage turnout.
• Political stability: Perceptions of bias could fuel unrest.

Ensuring transparency in both data management and polling booth location is essential to safeguard the credibility of the 2026 Assembly elections.

10. Conclusion: A Call for Neutrality and Reform

The West Bengal Election Commission Controversy 2025 underscores the challenges of managing elections in a politically charged environment. Mamata Banerjee’s objections highlight the need for:

• Neutral polling booth locations.
• Transparency in data management.
• Support for BLOs and district administrations.

Ultimately, the credibility of India’s democracy depends on ensuring that electoral processes are fair, transparent, and inclusive.

🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

• Election Commission of India (ECI): https://eci.gov.in
• Chief Electoral Officer, West Bengal: https://ceowestbengal.nic.in
• National Voters’ Service Portal (NVSP): https://www.nvsp.in
• Ministry of Law and Justice – Representation of People Act, 1950: https://legislative.gov.in
• Press Information Bureau (Government of India): https://pib.gov.in

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More