West Bengal Revamps OBC List After Court Scrutiny: Backwardness, Not Religion, Becomes Focus

West Bengal Revamps OBC List: In May 2024, the Calcutta High Court struck down West Bengal’s OBC list (issued post-2010), declaring that “religion indeed appears to have been the sole criterion” in many inclusions. The court invalidated OBC status for 113 subgroups, recalibrating the state’s reservations from 17% to just 7% and cancelling nearly 12 lakh caste certificates, affecting around five lakh people

The ruling disrupted higher-education admissions, public service recruitments, and job examinations—including for institutions like Jadavpur University, which subsequently halted OBC-category admissions pending legal clarity

West Bengal Revamps OBC List: Supreme Court Mandate & State Response

The Bengal government appealed to the Supreme Court, which granted a three-month window (ending June 2025) to:

1. Conduct a fresh, scientific survey

2. Re-evaluate backwardness criteria per Court directions

3. Present a revised list before the Monsoon session

The state Cabinet, led by CM Mamata Banerjee, swiftly revived and formalized its efforts via the West Bengal Backward Classes Commission (WBCBC), assisted by agencies including the Bureau of Applied Economics & Statistics

Survey Findings & New List Composition

• The fresh survey identified 140 subgroups across OBC-A (49 groups) and OBC-B (91 groups), with another 50 under review

• Religious representation: Of these, 80 Muslim subgroups—representing 57.1% of the total—were included ($36 of 49 in OBC-A = 73.4% Muslim; 44 of 91 in OBC-B = 48.3% Muslim)

• Reservation percentages were restored: 7% for OBC-A, 10% for OBC-B, totalling 17%—with potential increases pending final evaluation of the 50 additional communities

CM Banerjee emphasized the process was based solely on “social and economic backwardness”, not on religion, and assured immediate resumption of OBC certificate issuance for college admissions and government jobs

Political & Opposition Backlash

🔸 BJP Allegations

The Opposition BJP criticized the overhaul, accusing the TMC of inciting appeasement politics and creating a “dangerous precedent” that rewards religious conversions under the guise of social inclusion.

🔸 BJP’s Facts Point

Digging into historical data, analysts revealed:

• Pre-2010: Of 66 OBC subgroups, only 11 were Muslim (~17%).

• Post-2025: Of 76 new groups, 46 + 21 = 67 are Muslim (~88%)

This sharp shift has intensified the narrative around religious bias, made more concerning given the 27% Muslim population share in the state.

🔸 TMC Response

TMC dismissed these claims, calling them a “divide and rule” tactic by the BJP. CM Banerjee and her party reiterated that backwardness was the sole criterion, and any other claims are “baseless misinformation.” TMC urged focus on factual survey methodology, not communal narratives.

Impact & Administrative Unfreezing

With the new list in place, several previously stalled processes can now resume:

• Issuance of OBC certificates

• School, college, and university admissions

• State government recruitments

• Examinations, applications, and promotions in public sector roles.

Notably, Jadavpur University and other education bodies can now reconsider OBC quotas, though final adjustments await Supreme Court affirmation and potential updates in the Monsoon session

Legal Stakes & Future Outlook

Supreme Court Review

The revised list is formally before the Supreme Court, which must decide if it truly aligns with constitutional standards and court guidelines—principally, that religion cannot be a reservation criterion. Its final verdict is expected post-June 2025, but could extend into late 2025 or beyond .

Potential Outcomes

1. SC Approval: Validates the new list, certificates restored, 17% quota fully restored.

2. Further Modifications: Court identifies lingering irregularities, mandates adjustments and further surveys.

3. Further Strikes: If still ruled religion-based, the list—and current seats—must be nullified again, restarting the cycle.

Broader Context & Constitutional Principles

• Constitutional Mandate: Under Article 16(4), state-backed commissions must evaluate caste/socio-educational backwardness, not religion.

• Calcutta HC’s 2024 Ruling explicitly emphasized unconstitutionality where religion predominates reservation decisions

• Bench Support: Surveying, classification, and sub-categorisation (A/B) are permissible if they meet judicial tests of transparency, methodology, and secular criteria.

Political and Social Reverberations

• Electoral Strategy: With 2026 Assembly elections approaching, critics frame the move as a “vote-bank” strategy targeting Muslim communities

• TMC Narrative: Presents the overhaul as a rectification of past administrative neglect, focusing on scientific survey and inclusion of genuinely backward groups.

• Opposition Mobilization: BJP and others are promising electoral contests and potential legal fights in court—a political flashpoint likely through 2026.

On-the-Ground Effect

• Abolition of Delay: Admission and recruitment processes set in motion again after a year-long legal freeze

• Affected Communities: Thousands who had lost OBC certificates and job access get renewed eligibility—though financial and bureaucratic flow may lag.

• Administrative Readiness: Government agencies must process certification applications, revise seat matrices, and prepare to adapt if the Supreme Court intervenes.

Road Ahead: Key Dates & Scenarios

In Conclusion

West Bengal’s revised OBC list—140 entrants now, plus ~50 more under review—mark a calculated response to judicial setbacks. The CPI:

• Restores 17% quota by reintroducing abolished categories

• Prioritizes survey-justified inclusion while brushing off religious bias claims

• Faces fierce political backlash, with parties trading charges of appeasement and misinformation

• Awaits Supreme Court review, which will ultimately decide if it aligns with constitutional values

This unfolding saga sits at the intersection of law, politics, justice, and community rights—with residents, students, aspirants, and parties all standing to gain—or lose—depending on future rulings.

DO FOLLOW:

• West Bengal Government Official Website
• Calcutta High Court

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More