CM Stalin, EPS Silent Over Centre’s Fund Denial to Tamil Nadu

CM Stalin, EPS silent became the central political message as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin sharply criticised AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami for not questioning the Union government over the denial of funds to the state. Speaking at a DMK Youth Wing meeting in the southern zone, Stalin accused the opposition leader of failing to stand up for Tamil Nadu’s financial rights at a crucial time.

The Chief Minister alleged that despite repeated instances of the Centre withholding funds, Palaniswami had chosen not to raise the issue publicly. Stalin claimed this silence weakened Tamil Nadu’s position and allowed the Union government to continue ignoring the state’s demands. The remarks come at a time when political activity is gaining momentum ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections.

Stalin also accused the BJP-led Union government of completely sidelining Tamil Nadu in the Union Budget. According to him, the state received no meaningful allocation despite its contribution to the national economy. He said this approach reflected political bias rather than economic logic.

CM Stalin, EPS Silent Debate Highlights Centre–State Tensions

Expanding on his criticism, Stalin said Palaniswami appeared more focused on aligning with the BJP than questioning the Centre on issues affecting Tamil Nadu. He alleged that the former Chief Minister had failed to speak clearly on important policy matters, including legislation that could have financial consequences for states.

The Chief Minister stated that Tamil Nadu’s development record under the DMK government stands in contrast to the Centre’s treatment of the state. He highlighted that the state continues to perform strongly across several sectors, earning recognition at both national and international levels. Despite this, he said, Tamil Nadu has been denied its rightful share of funds.

Stalin referred to the DMK’s electoral success in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, where the party-led alliance won all seats in the state. He said the same level of focus and unity would be applied in the 2026 Assembly elections, with a clear goal of securing a strong mandate.

He also listed several long-pending demands that, according to him, have not received adequate attention from the Union government. These include financial support for education schemes, assistance for metro rail projects, disaster relief funds, and approval for key infrastructure projects. Stalin said the continued delay in addressing these issues has slowed progress in certain areas.

CM Stalin, EPS Silent Issue Shapes DMK’s Election Narrative

The Chief Minister also spoke about the organisational strength of the DMK, particularly the role of the Youth Wing. He said leadership is being developed in a structured manner, starting from booth-level workers to state-level responsibilities. Stalin noted that this approach would help the party stay connected with voters across regions.

He said he has been closely observing the performance of Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin and expressed confidence in the Youth Wing’s growing role in outreach and mobilisation. According to him, young party workers are being trained to communicate policies clearly and counter opposition narratives effectively.

Stalin urged party members not to become complacent and to continue engaging with voters until the final day of campaigning. He stressed the importance of reaching first-time voters while also maintaining strong ties with traditional supporters.

Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin also addressed the gathering, criticising the BJP’s development record in states ruled by the party. He said Tamil Nadu’s growth indicators were significantly better, reinforcing the state’s position as a leader in governance and development. Also Read: Tribal Dept to Team Up With Global Chess Body to Reshape Learning in Schools in 2026

Conclusion

The CM Stalin, EPS silent controversy has added sharp edges to Tamil Nadu’s political debate as elections approach. By focusing on fund denial and leadership accountability, the DMK is positioning centre–state relations as a key issue for voters in the coming months.

Top Court Refuses to Hear Petition on Madras High Court Collegium Recommendations

Top court refuses to hear a writ petition that questioned the recommendations of the Madras High Court collegium, making it clear that such matters fall outside judicial review. The Supreme Court’s decision has once again highlighted the clear boundary between judicial scrutiny and administrative discretion within the higher judiciary.

The petition was brought before the apex court seeking intervention against recommendations made by the Madras High Court collegium in November 2025. The petitioner argued that the collegium was not properly constituted at the time the recommendations were made. However, the Supreme Court was firm in its view that the issue did not warrant examination on the judicial side.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, along with Justice Joymalya Bagchi, refused to entertain the plea. The court observed that the matter was not justiciable and should be addressed only through the administrative processes of the judiciary. With this, the petition was disposed of without going into the merits of the claims raised.

Top Court Refuses to Hear Collegium Matters Citing Administrative Authority

While explaining its stand, the Supreme Court stated that collegium-related decisions are handled within the internal administrative framework of the judiciary. The bench made it clear that courts cannot be approached to question such recommendations through writ petitions.

The petitioner had challenged the validity of the Madras High Court collegium’s recommendations, claiming that Justice Banu was excluded from the collegium prematurely. According to the plea, her transfer to another High Court had not been officially implemented at the time of the recommendations. On this basis, the petitioner argued that the collegium was improperly formed and that its decisions were constitutionally flawed.

Despite these claims, the apex court was unconvinced. It noted that decisions regarding the composition and functioning of the collegium system are within the domain of the Chief Justice of India and the collegium mechanism itself. The bench stated that such internal matters cannot be converted into legal disputes for adjudication.

The court also pointed out that allowing judicial challenges to collegium decisions would interfere with the independence of the judiciary’s appointment process. It emphasised that the collegium system functions through established conventions and internal checks, which are not meant to be examined through litigation.

Top Court Refuses to Hear Plea, Strengthening Collegium Independence

By declining to hear the petition, the Supreme Court reaffirmed a long-standing principle that administrative decisions related to judicial appointments are not open to judicial review. The court made it clear that dissatisfaction with collegium recommendations cannot form the basis of a writ petition.

Legal observers note that this decision reinforces the separation between judicial functions and administrative authority within the higher judiciary. The Supreme Court’s stance sends a strong message that the collegium system cannot be challenged through court proceedings unless there is a clear violation of constitutional provisions, which was not established in this case.

The bench also underlined that repeated challenges to collegium decisions could disrupt the functioning of High Courts and delay appointments. By refusing to entertain such petitions, the court aims to maintain stability and consistency in the judicial appointment process.

This ruling also aligns with earlier decisions where the Supreme Court has declined to intervene in collegium-related matters. Over the years, the apex court has consistently held that internal decisions of the judiciary should be respected to preserve institutional integrity. Also Read: Tribal Dept to Team Up With Global Chess Body to Reshape Learning in Schools in 2026

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the petition marks a clear reaffirmation of the collegium system’s administrative autonomy. By drawing firm limits on judicial intervention, the top court has reinforced the principle that internal judicial processes must remain free from litigation-driven challenges.

First Flight Trip to Bengaluru Opens New World for TN Government School Students

First flight trip to Bengaluru became a memorable milestone for 12 students from a Tamil Nadu government school, marking a rare and inspiring experience that blended education, exposure, and aspiration. For students of the panchayat union middle school at Sethurapatti in Pudukkottai district, the journey was not just about travel but about seeing possibilities beyond textbooks and classrooms.

The students, accompanied by six teachers, boarded a flight from Tiruchy to Bengaluru, making it the first time most of them had ever stepped into an airport or flown in an aircraft. The educational tour was organised as part of a planned exposure programme aimed at motivating students through real-world learning and recognition of merit.

For children from rural backgrounds, where travel opportunities are limited, the experience offered a rare chance to explore a major city and understand the functioning of institutions they had only read about in books.

First flight trip to Bengaluru planned through merit and teamwork

The selection of students for the tour was done carefully to encourage academic effort and participation. Students from Classes 3 to 5 were chosen based on their half-yearly examination performance, while those from Classes 6 to 8 earned their place through a quiz competition. This method ensured that the trip served as a reward for hard work rather than a casual outing.

Teachers said the process motivated students across the school to focus on studies and co-curricular activities. The exposure programme was designed not only to recognise academic achievement but also to instil discipline, confidence, and curiosity among students.

Funding for the trip was arranged through contributions from students, teachers, and the School Management Committee. Education officials were informed in advance, ensuring transparency and proper coordination. The collective effort behind the tour reflected strong community involvement in supporting education beyond routine classroom teaching.

Educators involved in the programme said such initiatives are important in government schools, where students often lack access to experiences that broaden their outlook. Seeing new environments helps children imagine futures that go beyond immediate surroundings.

First flight trip to Bengaluru blends education with inspiration

During their stay, the students visited important landmarks that combined learning with inspiration. One of the key destinations was the Karnataka Legislative Assembly at Vidhana Soudha, where students observed the functioning of a democratic institution. Teachers explained the role of lawmakers, governance processes, and the importance of civic responsibility in simple terms that students could understand.

The group also visited the Visvesvaraya Industrial and Technological Museum, where interactive exhibits introduced students to science, engineering, and innovation. For many, it was the first time seeing practical demonstrations of concepts they had studied only theoretically.

Apart from educational visits, the students also experienced city life, public transport, and structured travel schedules. Teachers noted that such exposure improves communication skills, discipline, and adaptability among children.

First flight trip to Bengaluru reflects effort beyond the classroom

Students expressed excitement and curiosity throughout the trip. One student said seeing the Assembly building made him want to study harder and aim for a responsible position in public service. Teachers said such reactions showed the real impact of experiential learning.

The return journey was planned by bus, allowing students to observe different landscapes and travel modes, further adding to the learning experience.

Teachers involved in the programme said this initiative would be continued every year as a merit-based reward. They believe consistent exposure programmes help bridge the gap between rural education and broader opportunities. Also Read: Tribal Dept to Team Up With Global Chess Body to Reshape Learning in Schools in 2026

The headmaster explained that education should not be limited to textbooks alone. When students are shown what lies beyond their village, it changes how they think about learning, effort, and ambition.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by nenu_memer_kadu (@nenu_memer_kadu)

Parents of the students also expressed pride and gratitude, saying the experience had boosted their children’s confidence and interest in studies. Many said it was the first time their children had travelled so far from home.

Conclusion

The first flight trip to Bengaluru was more than a journey for these government school students. It was an experience that expanded their horizons, strengthened their motivation, and showed how education, when combined with exposure, can shape dreams and aspirations in meaningful ways.