Thursday, December 25, 2025
Home Blog Page 61

Goa Nightclub Fire: Shocking Escape of Owners to Thailand After 25 Deaths

Goa – The devastating Goa nightclub fire that claimed 25 lives has taken a dramatic turn as police revealed that the owners of the establishment fled to Thailand just hours after the tragedy. Saurabh Luthra and his brother Gaurav, Delhi-based businessmen who own Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub in Arpora, boarded a flight to Phuket on Sunday morning, mere hours after the blaze that killed mostly staff members and a family from Delhi.

Owners Fled Hours After Goa Nightclub Fire

According to Goa Police‘s official statement on Monday, the Luthra brothers took IndiGo flight 6E 1073 from Delhi to Phuket at 5:30 am on December 7. The Goa nightclub fire broke out late Saturday night, with police receiving the emergency call at 12:04 am on Sunday. This timing indicates that the owners fled the country within hours of the tragic incident that devastated their establishment.

Police officers visited the Luthra brothers’ residence in Delhi on Monday, only to discover they were not present. Later that day, authorities confirmed through investigation that both owners had already left the country, raising serious questions about their intent and potential culpability in the Goa nightclub fire.

Look-Out Notice Issued After Tragedy

A look-out notice was issued against the Luthra brothers through the Bureau of Immigration on Sunday evening, though by then they had already departed Indian territory. Deputy superintendent of police Nilesh Rane, serving as public relations officer for the Goa Police, provided details about the investigation’s progress.

“The Bureau of Immigration at Mumbai was contacted and it was found that both the accused had taken 6E 1073 flight (New Delhi to Phuket) at 5.30 am on 7th December i.e. immediately after the incident which had taken place around midnight. It shows their intent to avoid police investigation,” Rane stated.

The Goa nightclub fire investigation has now taken on an international dimension, with authorities coordinating with Interpol to apprehend the fugitive owners.

Interpol Coordination for Apprehension

Goa Police have escalated their efforts by engaging with the Interpol Division of the Central Bureau of Investigation to track down and apprehend both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra at the earliest opportunity. The international manhunt underscores the seriousness of the Goa nightclub fire case and the determination of authorities to bring those responsible to justice.

The coordinated effort between local police, immigration authorities, and international law enforcement agencies demonstrates the complexity of pursuing suspects who have fled across international borders following such a catastrophic incident.

Social Media Statement From Owner

Despite fleeing to Thailand, Saurabh Luthra posted a statement on Instagram on Monday addressing the Goa nightclub fire. “The management expresses profound grief and is deeply shaken by the tragic loss of lives resulting from the unfortunate incident at Birch,” he wrote, offering assistance and support to victims’ families in “every possible form.”

Critics have questioned the sincerity of this statement given that it was posted from outside the country while the owner was evading investigation into the Goa nightclub fire that devastated multiple families.

Victims Include Three Sisters and Family

The Goa nightclub fire claimed 25 lives, with victims primarily being staff members of the establishment. Among the deceased were three sisters—Anita, Kamla, and Saroj Joshi—along with Vinod Kumar, the husband of another sister. Their cremations were conducted in Delhi on Monday, bringing profound grief to their families.

The victims’ profiles highlight the human cost of the Goa nightclub fire, affecting not just employees working at the venue but also patrons who were present during the tragic incident.

Massive Fire at Arpora Nightclub

The Goa nightclub fire broke out at the establishment located in Arpora, a coastal village in north Goa. Initial investigations suggest the blaze possibly started after a cooking-gas cylinder explosion, though authorities are conducting a comprehensive probe to determine the exact cause and fix responsibility.

Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant has constituted a four-member magisterial inquiry committee to investigate all aspects of the Goa nightclub fire, including potential safety violations and negligence that may have contributed to the tragedy.

Employee Detained for Questioning

Police detained Bharat Kohli, an employee of the nightclub, in Delhi on Monday. He was subsequently transported to Goa for questioning as part of the ongoing investigation into the Goa nightclub fire. Authorities are interviewing multiple individuals associated with the establishment to piece together the events leading to the tragedy.

Government Crackdown on Romeo Lane Properties

The state’s BJP government initiated a crackdown on Romeo Lane, the chain of upscale restaurants and bars operating in multiple cities across India. Two properties belonging to the chain were reportedly sealed in Vagator and Assagao in Goa, along with a beach shack and another club.

This swift action following the Goa nightclub fire demonstrates authorities’ determination to enforce safety regulations and hold establishments accountable for compliance failures. The sealing of multiple properties suggests potential systemic issues within the Romeo Lane chain’s Goa operations.

Ongoing Investigation and Accountability

As the investigation into the Goa nightclub fire continues, authorities are working on multiple fronts—from tracking down the fugitive owners internationally to examining safety protocols and potential violations at the establishment. The tragedy has raised serious questions about nightclub safety regulations, enforcement mechanisms, and the responsibility of establishment owners to ensure patron and employee safety.

The international escape of the owners has added urgency to calls for stricter monitoring of establishment owners facing serious allegations, particularly in cases involving loss of life.

Trump Tariff on India: President Threatens Action Over Rice Dumping

Washington D.C. – US President Donald Trump has signaled his intention to impose a Trump tariff on India, specifically targeting rice imports that he claims are being “dumped” into the American market. The announcement came during a White House meeting on Monday, where Trump unveiled $12 billion in fresh support for American farmers struggling with market pressures.

Trump Accuses India of Rice Dumping

During the roundtable discussion in the Cabinet Room, Trump was presented with a list of countries allegedly dumping rice into the US market. India, Thailand, and China were identified as the primary nations engaged in this practice. The Trump tariff on India emerged as a potential solution to protect domestic rice producers who have faced declining prices due to increased imports.

Rice industry executive Meryl Kennedy, founder and CEO of Kennedy Rice Mills and 4 Sisters Rice, informed the President about falling rice prices affecting American farmers. Kennedy highlighted how imports were challenging domestic producers, prompting Trump to consider immediate action.

Direct Questioning on Indian Rice Imports

The President directed pointed questions at Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding India’s rice import status. “Tell me about India. Why is India allowed to do that? They have to pay tariffs, do they have an exemption on rice?” Trump asked, seeking clarification on existing trade arrangements.

When Bessent attempted to explain that negotiations on a trade deal with India were still ongoing, Trump interrupted, stating firmly, “Yeah, but they shouldn’t be dumping. I mean I heard that from others too. You can’t do that.”

The President’s comments suggest that the Trump tariff on India could be implemented regardless of ongoing trade negotiations, emphasizing his commitment to protecting American agricultural interests.

Promise to Address Indian Rice Dumping

Trump assured attendees that he would “take care” of the alleged dumping of Indian rice into the US market. This statement indicates that a Trump tariff on India specifically targeting rice imports may be imminent, despite the potential diplomatic ramifications.

The proposed measures reflect Trump’s broader approach to trade policy, which prioritizes domestic production and seeks to level what he perceives as unfair competitive advantages held by foreign exporters.

Canadian Fertilizer Also in Crosshairs

Beyond rice, Trump also suggested implementing tariff measures on fertilizer imports from Canada. “A lot of it does come in from Canada, and so we’ll end up putting very severe tariffs on that, if we have to, because that’s the way you want to bolster here,” the President stated.

Trump emphasized that fertilizer production could be expanded domestically, arguing that tariffs would encourage local manufacturing and reduce dependence on Canadian imports. This approach aligns with his administration’s broader strategy of using tariffs as tools to reshape international trade relationships.

Economic Context and Farmer Support

The Trump tariff on India comes amid ongoing economic pressures affecting American agriculture. Farmers, a crucial support base for Trump, have experienced rising costs and market challenges partly linked to previous tariff policies implemented by his administration.

Also Read: Trump Kennedy Center Honors: Shocking Jimmy Kimmel Jab During Ceremony

The $12 billion support package announced during the meeting aims to offset some of these challenges, but industry experts note that tariffs often create complex ripple effects throughout agricultural supply chains.

Ongoing Trade Negotiations Face Obstacles

Both Canada and India are currently engaged in trade negotiations with the United States aimed at stabilizing bilateral trade relationships. However, these discussions have encountered significant difficulties.

Earlier this year, Trump imposed 50% tariffs on Indian goods, citing trade barriers and energy purchase concerns. A US delegation is scheduled to visit India this week for further talks, though officials anticipate no major breakthrough in the immediate future.

The Trump tariff on India for rice dumping would add another layer of complexity to already strained trade relations between the world’s two largest democracies.

Concerns About Inflation and Consumer Prices

Critics of aggressive tariff policies warn that the Trump tariff on India and similar measures could contribute to inflation and higher consumer prices. While tariffs aim to protect domestic producers, they often result in increased costs for importers and, ultimately, consumers.

The agricultural sector particularly feels the impact of retaliatory tariffs, as countries targeted by US trade measures frequently respond with their own tariffs on American agricultural exports.

NAFTA and Broader Trade Policy Review

Trump has also previously raised tariff concerns with Canada, including threats to increase duties on products not covered by the North American Free Trade Agreement. Recent statements suggest his administration may revisit the agreement itself, potentially implementing the Trump tariff on India as part of a comprehensive restructuring of US trade relationships.

As negotiations continue with multiple trading partners, the Trump tariff on India represents the administration’s willingness to use tariffs as primary tools for addressing perceived trade imbalances and protecting American industries from foreign competition.

Abhishek Banerjee Rejects BJP Nandigram Claim 2025

The Abhishek Banerjee Rejects BJP Nandigram Claim 2025 controversy has become a defining moment in Bengal’s political narrative. On December 1, 2025, Abhishek Banerjee, TMC national general secretary, dismissed BJP’s claim that he was preparing to contest from Nandigram as a “manufactured flutter.” His statement underscored the party’s stance that decisions on candidacy are internal matters, not dictated by opposition speculation

2. The BJP’s Allegation

Union Minister Sukanta Majumdar alleged:

  • Abhishek Banerjee was preparing to contest from Nandigram.
  • He was “posting loyal officers” in the district.
  • Contesting from Nandigram was part of Banerjee’s plan to become deputy CM.

Majumdar later retreated, saying: “Wherever Mamata Banerjee contests, we will defeat her.”


3. Abhishek Banerjee’s Response

Banerjee countered:

  • “If the party asks me to contest from Nandigram, I will do that. If the party asks me to contest from Darjeeling, I will do that as well.”
  • He emphasized loyalty to party decisions.
  • He dismissed BJP’s speculation as an “inner wish” of Majumdar.

This reflects the TMC’s strategy of deflecting opposition narratives.


4. Suvendu Adhikari’s Intervention

Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari declared:

  • “Even if Abhishek contests from here, nobody in Nandigram will vote for him.”
  • He framed Nandigram as BJP’s “fortress.”

TMC countered by highlighting its panchayat poll victories in Nandigram, arguing grassroots workers could defeat BJP without top leaders.


5. Historical Context: Nandigram’s Symbolism

Nandigram holds unique importance in Bengal politics:

  • 2007 farmers’ resistance against Left Front’s land acquisition reshaped state politics.
  • Mamata Banerjee and Suvendu Adhikari emerged as faces of the agitation.
  • The movement carried TMC to victory in 2011.
  • Mamata’s narrow loss to Adhikari in 2021 added to the constituency’s symbolic weight.

Nandigram remains a recurring symbol of mandate and muscle in Bengal’s political script. 


6. Governance Challenges

The incident highlights systemic governance issues:

  • Speculation-driven politics overshadowing policy debates.
  • Symbolic battles dominating electoral narratives.
  • Weak communication between parties and citizens on substantive issues.

7. Abhishek Banerjee Rejects BJP: Political Fallout

The controversy has political consequences:

  • BJP seeks to frame Nandigram as its stronghold.
  • TMC emphasizes grassroots strength and dismisses BJP’s claims.
  • Civil society debates the role of symbolism in electoral politics.

8. Broader Implications for Democracy

The incident raises fundamental questions:

  • Can democracy thrive if constituencies become symbolic battlegrounds?
  • Will governance prioritize development over political theatrics?
  • How can parties balance symbolism with substantive policy?

9. Recommendations for Reform

Experts suggest:

  • Focus on development agendas rather than symbolic contests.
  • Transparent communication on candidate selection.
  • Community engagement to reduce speculation-driven politics.
  • Institutional safeguards against misinformation.

10. Comparative Lessons from Other States

Other states have faced similar symbolic battles:

  • Amethi in Uttar Pradesh became a symbol of Congress vs BJP rivalry.
  • Gujarat’s Gandhinagar reflected BJP’s organizational strength.
  • Bengal’s Nandigram mirrors these national trends of symbolic constituencies.

11. Human Stories: Grassroots Voices

Residents of Nandigram expressed:

  • Pride in the constituency’s historic role.
  • Anxiety about being reduced to a political symbol.
  • Hope for development beyond symbolic battles.

These voices highlight the human dimension of political symbolism.


12. Scientific and Economic Impact

Researchers emphasized:

  • Symbolic constituencies often receive disproportionate attention.
  • Development projects may be delayed due to political tussles.
  • Electoral narratives shape investment and governance priorities.

13. Conclusion: A Test of Governance and Symbolism

The Abhishek Banerjee Rejects BJP Nandigram Claim 2025 case is more than a political dispute — it is a test of governance, democracy, and symbolism. Unless systemic reforms are undertaken, constituencies like Nandigram will remain vulnerable to speculation-driven politics.

The controversy underscores the urgency of balancing symbolic battles with governance accountability and development priorities.


🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More

Suvendu Adhikari Criticizes TMC Over Bengal SIR Malpractices 2025

The Suvendu Adhikari Criticizes TMC Bengal SIR 2025 controversy has become a defining moment in Bengal’s political landscape. On December 2, 2025, BJP leader and Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari accused the Trinamool Congress (TMC) of manipulating the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. He alleged that the Election Commission of India (ECI) was failing to curb malpractices, thereby undermining democratic integrity.


2. Background: The Special Intensive Revision (SIR)

The SIR is a voter roll update exercise mandated by the ECI.

  • BLOs (Booth Level Officers) distribute pre‑filled forms to voters.
  • Voters must sign and return these forms to confirm inclusion.
  • The process aims to weed out duplicate, deceased, or shifted voters.
  • In Bengal, the SIR was ordered in October 2025, covering millions of voters.

This reflects the Commission’s attempt to modernize and clean electoral rolls.


3. Suvendu Adhikari’s Allegations

Adhikari accused TMC of:

  • Pressuring BLOs to hand over voter forms to party cadres.
  • Preventing BLOs from independently verifying voter identities.
  • Using political influence to manipulate the revision process.
  • Exploiting loopholes to retain fake or duplicate voters.

He claimed the ECI was failing to enforce accountability.


4. The Election Commission’s Position

The ECI defended itself by citing:

  • 99.77% of voters received pre‑filled forms.
  • 70.14% of forms had already been returned.
  • Special care was taken to include vulnerable groups.
  • Allegations of disenfranchisement were “exaggerated.”

This reflects the Commission’s reliance on data to counter criticism.


5. Suvendu Adhikari Criticizes TMC: Governance Challenges

The incident highlights systemic governance failures:

  • Weak enforcement of rules at the grassroots level.
  • Political interference in administrative processes.
  • Delayed response to BLO grievances.
  • Lack of transparency in monitoring voter roll revisions.

6. Political Fallout

The controversy has political consequences:

  • BJP accused TMC of undermining democracy.
  • TMC dismissed allegations as politically motivated.
  • Civil society debated governance failures in electoral processes.

The issue has become a flashpoint ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections.


7. Historical Context: Electoral Roll Controversies in India

India has long faced challenges in maintaining accurate voter rolls:

  • Assam’s NRC excluded millions due to documentation gaps.
  • Past revisions saw BLOs complain of underpayment and overwork.
  • Bengal’s SIR echoes these controversies, highlighting systemic flaws.

8. Broader Implications for Democracy

The incident raises fundamental questions:

  • Can elections be credible if BLOs collapse under workload?
  • Will voter rolls be accurate if frontline staff are demoralised?
  • Does democracy risk losing legitimacy if electoral processes are politicized?

9. Recommendations for Reform

Experts suggest:

  • Staggered timelines for voter roll revision.
  • Hiring additional staff to support BLOs.
  • Improved technology for faster digitisation.
  • Compensation packages for BLO families.
  • Policy reform to recognize BLOs as permanent electoral staff.

10. Comparative Lessons from Other States

Other states have faced similar controversies:

  • Assam’s NRC excluded millions despite decades of residence.
  • Tripura’s refugee politics shaped electoral outcomes.
  • Bengal’s case reflects a national challenge of balancing electoral integrity with human dignity.

11. Human Stories: BLOs and Families in Distress

BLOs described:

  • Sudden collapses from exhaustion.
  • Panic attacks and high blood pressure.
  • Anxiety about punitive action if targets are missed.

These stories highlight the human cost of governance failures.


12. Law Enforcement and Accountability

Observers directed district magistrates to ensure:

  • BLOs are not forced to visit homes more than thrice.
  • No false information is uploaded on the BLO app.
  • Accountability measures are enforced to prevent manipulation.

This reflects the importance of institutional safeguards in democracy.


13. Scientific and Economic Impact

Researchers emphasized:

  • Electoral roll accuracy is vital for democratic legitimacy.
  • Errors can disenfranchise millions or allow duplicate voting.
  • Technology must be leveraged to reduce human error.

This adds a scientific perspective to the crisis.


14. Conclusion: A Test of Governance and Democracy

The Suvendu Adhikari Criticizes TMC Bengal SIR 2025 case is more than a political dispute — it is a test of governance, democracy, and human dignity. Unless systemic reforms are undertaken, BLOs and citizens will remain vulnerable, and public trust in institutions will erode.

The controversy underscores the urgency of balancing electoral integrity with compassion for frontline workers and governance accountability.


🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More

Election Commission Defends Bengal SIR Amid Disenfranchisement Allegations 2025

The Election Commission Defends Bengal SIR 2025 case has become a defining moment in India’s electoral governance. On December 2, 2025, the ECI submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court defending its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bengal. The Commission argued that allegations of mass disenfranchisement were exaggerated and politically motivated, citing data to prove that nearly all voters had been reached.


2. Background: The Special Intensive Revision (SIR)

The SIR is a voter roll update exercise mandated by the ECI.

  • It requires booth‑level officers (BLOs) to distribute pre‑filled enumeration forms.
  • Voters must sign and return these forms to confirm their inclusion.
  • The process aims to weed out duplicate, deceased, or shifted voters.
  • In Bengal, the SIR was ordered on October 27, 2025, covering multiple states.

This reflects the Commission’s attempt to modernize and clean electoral rolls.


3. The Allegations of Disenfranchisement

Trinamool Congress MP Dola Sen petitioned the Supreme Court, alleging:

  • Large‑scale exclusion of genuine voters.
  • Excessive workload on BLOs.
  • Political motives behind the revision.

Her plea sought to quash the directives ordering SIR in Bengal and other states.


4. The Election Commission’s Defense

In its affidavit, the ECI emphasized:

  • 99.77% of existing voters received pre‑filled forms.
  • 70.14% of forms had already been returned.
  • Special care was taken to include vulnerable groups such as the elderly, sick, and persons with disabilities.
  • Allegations of disenfranchisement were “highly exaggerated” and politically motivated.

This reflects the Commission’s reliance on data to counter criticism.


5. Governance and Institutional Role

The ECI directed:

  • BLOs to assist voters in filling forms.
  • Political party agents (BLAs) to monitor the process.
  • District officials to ensure no eligible voter was excluded.

This underscores the institutional safeguards built into the process.


6. Historical Context: Electoral Roll Controversies in India

India has long faced challenges in maintaining accurate voter rolls:

  • Assam’s NRC excluded millions due to documentation gaps.
  • Past revisions saw BLOs complain of underpayment and overwork.
  • Bengal’s SIR echoes these controversies, highlighting systemic flaws.

7. Political Fallout

The controversy has political consequences:

  • TMC accused the Centre of weaponizing the SIR to exclude minorities.
  • BJP defended the process as lawful and necessary.
  • Civil society debated governance failures in electoral processes.

The issue has become a flashpoint ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections.


8. Broader Implications for Democracy

The incident raises fundamental questions:

  • Can elections be credible if BLOs collapse under workload?
  • Will voter rolls be accurate if frontline staff are demoralised?
  • Does democracy risk losing legitimacy if electoral processes are rushed?

9. Election Commission Defends Bengal SIR: Recommendations for Reform

Experts suggest:

  • Staggered timelines for voter roll revision.
  • Hiring additional staff to support BLOs.
  • Improved technology for faster digitisation.
  • Compensation packages for BLO families.
  • Policy reform to recognize BLOs as permanent electoral staff.

10. Comparative Lessons from Other States

Other states have faced similar controversies:

  • Assam’s NRC excluded millions despite decades of residence.
  • Tripura’s refugee politics shaped electoral outcomes.
  • Bengal’s case reflects a national challenge of balancing electoral integrity with human dignity.

11. Human Stories: Families in Distress

Families of BLOs and citizens describe:

  • Sudden collapses from exhaustion.
  • Panic attacks and high blood pressure.
  • Anxiety about punitive action if targets are missed.

These stories highlight the human cost of governance failures.


12. Law Enforcement and Accountability

Observers directed district magistrates to ensure:

  • BLOs are not forced to visit homes more than thrice.
  • No false information is uploaded on the BLO app.
  • Accountability measures are enforced to prevent manipulation.

This reflects the importance of institutional safeguards in democracy.


13. Scientific and Economic Impact

Researchers emphasized:

  • Electoral roll accuracy is vital for democratic legitimacy.
  • Errors can disenfranchise millions or allow duplicate voting.
  • Technology must be leveraged to reduce human error.

This adds a scientific perspective to the crisis.


14. Conclusion: A Test of Governance and Democracy

The Election Commission Defends Bengal SIR 2025 is more than a bureaucratic exercise — it is a test of governance, democracy, and human dignity. Unless systemic reforms are undertaken, BLOs and citizens will remain vulnerable, and public trust in institutions will erode.

The controversy underscores the urgency of balancing electoral integrity with compassion for frontline workers and affected families.


🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More

India Commences Countdown to the 2nd WHO Global Summit on Strong Traditional Medicine

India officially began the countdown to the 2nd WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine, with the Ministry of Ayush hosting a Curtain Raiser Press Conference at the National Media Centre, New Delhi. The Summit, co-hosted by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Ministry of Ayush, will take place from 17–19 December 2025 at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi, bringing together global leaders, policymakers, and experts from more than 100 countries.


“India Leads the World in Restoring Balance Through Traditional Medicine”: Shri Prataprao Jadhav

Union Minister of State (IC) for Ayush, Shri Prataprao Jadhav, expressed pride in India hosting the Summit, following the success of the first edition held in Gujarat in 2023. He stated that the event represents a major global milestone in mainstreaming traditional medicine for human health, happiness, and well-being, aligned with India’s civilizational ethos — “Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah, Sarve Santu Niramayah.”

The Minister announced the theme of the Summit:
“Restoring Balance: The Science and Practice of Health and Well-Being.”

He emphasized India’s global leadership in traditional medicine, noting the rising recognition of Ayush systems — Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-Rigpa, and Homoeopathy — as trusted solutions for preventive, promotive, and holistic healthcare.




Dedicated Side Event on Ashwagandha: Bridging Tradition and Evidence

Shri Jadhav announced that the Ministry of Ayush will host a special side event on Ashwagandha, one of India’s most globally researched medicinal plants. The session will highlight:

  • Traditional Ayurvedic knowledge

  • Modern pharmacological and clinical evidence

  • Its adaptogenic, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory properties

  • Emerging global market opportunities

  • Safety and regulatory considerations

The event, titled “Ashwagandha: From Traditional Wisdom to Global Impact”, will be held from 17–19 December in partnership with the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre (GTMC), Jamnagar.


“Summit to Drive Evidence-Based Integration”: Dr. Poonam Khetrapal

Dr. Poonam Khetrapal, Regional Director Emeritus of WHO South-East Asia Region and Senior Advisor on Traditional Medicine to the WHO Director-General, emphasized that the Summit marks a significant moment in global health cooperation.

She stated that participation from over 100 countries will help shape a decade-long roadmap for:

  • Evidence-based integration of traditional and integrative medicine

  • Strengthening research, regulatory frameworks, and safety standards

  • Advancing biodiversity conservation and equitable benefit-sharing

  • Expanding digital health innovations in traditional medicine

Dr. Khetrapal highlighted that billions worldwide rely on traditional medicine and stressed the urgent need to bridge evidence gaps through rigorous science, innovation, and cross-border collaboration.


India–WHO Collaboration Strengthens Global Traditional Medicine Agenda

Shri Jadhav noted that the establishment of the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre (GTMC) in Jamnagar reflects growing international confidence in India’s knowledge systems.

He appreciated WHO’s partnership and acknowledged the significant role of media in generating awareness and promoting trust in traditional and integrative medicine.

Senior officials present on the dais included:

  • Vaidya Rajesh Kotecha, Secretary, Ministry of Ayush

  • Shri Dhirendra Ojha, Principal Director General, PIB

  • Ms. Alarmelmangai D, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Ayush

  • Ms. Monalisa Dash, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Ayush

  • Shri Satyajit Paul, Deputy Director General, Ministry of Ayush

The event also saw participation from senior officials, health experts, and media representatives.


Global Delegations Prepare for High-Level Summit

The 2nd WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine will feature:

  • Ministerial roundtables

  • Scientific plenaries

  • Innovation showcases

  • Policy dialogues on integrative health

  • Discussions on digital health, biodiversity protection, and sustainable supply chains

The Summit follows the Ambassadors’ Reception (9–10 November 2025), where diplomats were briefed on India’s leadership role and the global significance of the event.


Conclusion

With the commencement of the countdown to the 2nd WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine, India reaffirms its commitment to advancing holistic, integrative, and sustainable healthcare. The Summit is expected to deliver landmark outcomes that will shape global health policies, support scientific validation of traditional practices, and strengthen international cooperation for years to come.


For more real-time updates, visit Channel 6 Network.

Source: PIB

Proudly Hosting UNESCO’s 20th ICH Committee at Red Fort Reflects India’s Unique Blend of Tangible and Intangible Heritage: Culture Secretary

The 20th Session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) of UNESCO commenced today at the historic Red Fort in New Delhi. The opening day witnessed participation from senior officials including Shri Vivek Aggarwal, Secretary, Ministry of Culture; Shri Vishal V. Sharma, 20 COM Chairperson and India’s Permanent Representative to UNESCO; and Mr Ernesto Ottone, Assistant Director General for Culture at UNESCO.

After the morning session, Shri Vivek Aggarwal chaired a press conference outlining India’s contributions, vision, and continued leadership in safeguarding living heritage.


India’s Cultural Heritage: A Fusion of Tangible Grandeur and Living Traditions

Speaking at the press conference, Shri Vivek Aggarwal stated that hosting the 20th session at the iconic UNESCO World Heritage Site of Red Fort symbolizes India’s distinctive fusion of tangible heritage—monuments, architecture, archaeological sites—and intangible cultural expressions such as performing arts, rituals, craftsmanship, festivals, and oral traditions.

He underscored India’s community-centered approach to safeguarding intangible heritage, driven by:

  • Expansion of the National Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage

  • Capacity-building programmes for practitioners and knowledge-holders

  • Integration of living heritage into national development frameworks

The Secretary highlighted India’s 15 elements inscribed on UNESCO’s Representative List, from Vedic Chanting, Kutiyattam and Yoga, to Durga Puja, Garba, Kumbh Mela, and others—describing them as a “kaleidoscope of India’s cultural identity.”

He affirmed that intangible heritage represents the “living heartbeat of humanity,” preserved and transmitted across generations by communities.




Global Challenges and UNESCO’s Role in Safeguarding Living Heritage

Shri Aggarwal noted that the session is taking place at a time when intangible cultural heritage worldwide is threatened by:

  • Commercialization pressures

  • Shifting social and community dynamics

  • Transformations brought by digital ecosystems

He emphasized that UNESCO’s multilateral platform remains essential for dialogue, cooperation, and collective stewardship to ensure sustainable preservation of cultural expressions across nations.


India’s Leadership in Intangible Heritage Governance

Addressing the gathering, Shri Vishal V. Sharma, Chairperson of the 20th COM Session, welcomed participating delegates from across the world and reaffirmed India’s long-standing commitment to safeguarding global cultural heritage.

He noted that India’s ongoing membership (2022–2026) in the Intergovernmental Committee strengthens its role in shaping global frameworks, policies, and collaborative initiatives for protecting living heritage.


UNESCO Acknowledges India’s Role and Hospitality

UNESCO’s Assistant Director General for Culture, Mr Ernesto Ottone, expressed heartfelt gratitude to the Government of India for hosting the 20th session in New Delhi. He applauded India’s sustained efforts and leadership in protecting cultural heritage, and appreciated the enriched dialogue fostered through the New Delhi session.


A Global Gathering at the Red Fort

The week-long session, scheduled from 8–13 December 2025, is bringing together nearly 1,000 delegates from UNESCO Member States, cultural institutions, NGOs, researchers, heritage practitioners, and global experts.

Discussions will focus on:

  • Strengthening global safeguarding measures

  • Reviewing nominations to the Representative List

  • Enhancing international cooperation

  • Supporting communities who keep living traditions vibrant


Conclusion

By hosting the 20th ICH Committee session at the Red Fort, India has once again positioned itself at the heart of global cultural stewardship. The event showcases India’s profound civilizational heritage and reaffirms its commitment to ensuring that living traditions continue to thrive in a rapidly changing world.

As nearly a thousand global delegates convene in New Delhi, India’s leadership in cultural policy, preservation, and community-based heritage safeguarding shines on the world stage.


For more real-time updates, visit Channel 6 Network.

Source: PIB

Sunali Khatun Freed but Return to India Uncertain 2025

The Sunali Khatun Freed Return to India 2025 case has become emblematic of the challenges surrounding citizenship disputes in South Asia. On December 1, 2025, a Bangladesh court granted bail to Sunali, who is pregnant, along with five others including children. They had been deported from Delhi earlier this year on suspicion of being Bangladeshi nationals. While the Supreme Court of India has urged the Centre to consider her return on humanitarian grounds, bureaucratic delays and political sensitivities continue to stall her homecoming.


2. Background: Deportation and Detention

  • In June 2025, Delhi police detained Sunali, her husband, and their son, suspecting them of being Bangladeshi citizens.
  • Within days, they were deported to Bangladesh despite possessing documents claiming Indian origin.
  • Sunali was incarcerated in Chapainawabganj prison for over three months, enduring severe hardship during advanced pregnancy.

This reflects the complexity of deportation processes and the vulnerability of families caught in citizenship disputes.


3. Sunali Khatun Freed: Bangladesh Court’s Decision

On December 1, 2025, the Chapainawabganj court:

  • Declared Sunali and others to be Indian citizens.
  • Directed the Indian High Commission in Dhaka to initiate repatriation.
  • Released them under the custody of a Bangladeshi national until repatriation is finalized.

This ruling provided a legal lifeline but not immediate relief.


4. Supreme Court of India’s Intervention

On the same day, India’s Supreme Court:

  • Asked the Centre to consider Sunali’s return on humanitarian grounds.
  • Emphasized that deportees must be given opportunities to establish citizenship claims.
  • Directed physical verification of documents submitted by families.

Chief Justice Surya Kant noted: “It’s only on humanitarian grounds.”


5. Sunali’s Plea

Speaking from Bangladesh, Sunali said:

  • “I am at a very advanced stage of pregnancy. I want my baby to be born on Indian soil.”
  • She expressed exhaustion after months of incarceration and legal battles.

Her words highlight the human cost of bureaucratic delays and governance failures.


6. Governance Challenges

The case exposes systemic governance issues:

  • Delayed compliance with Calcutta High Court’s September 2025 order to repatriate.
  • Centre’s reluctance to act swiftly, citing precedent concerns.
  • Weak coordination between Indian and Bangladeshi authorities.

7. Political Fallout

The controversy has political consequences:

  • TMC leaders accused the Centre of negligence and cruelty.
  • BJP defended the deportation as lawful.
  • Civil society debated the balance between national security and humanitarian responsibility.

8. Historical Context: Citizenship Disputes in Bengal

Bengal has long been a hotspot for citizenship disputes:

  • Partition of 1947 displaced millions.
  • 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War triggered refugee influx.
  • Assam’s NRC excluded millions despite decades of residence.

Sunali’s case echoes these historic struggles of identity and belonging.


9. Broader Implications for Democracy

The incident raises fundamental questions:

  • Can democracy thrive if citizens are arbitrarily deported?
  • Will governance prioritize compassion over exclusion?
  • How can development balance citizenship with human dignity?

10. Recommendations for Reform

Experts suggest:

  • Fast‑track repatriation mechanisms for disputed cases.
  • Judicial oversight of deportation processes.
  • Community awareness campaigns on citizenship rights.
  • Transparent grievance redressal systems.

11. Comparative Lessons from Other Countries

Other nations have faced similar challenges:

  • Germany integrated refugees with legal safeguards.
  • Canada provided asylum seekers pathways to citizenship.
  • India’s case reflects a national struggle for balancing law, politics, and compassion.

12. Human Stories: Families in Distress

Families described:

  • Anxiety about losing homes and livelihoods.
  • Fear of being branded “illegal aliens.”
  • Hope for Supreme Court protection.

These stories highlight the human dimension of governance failures.


13. Law Enforcement and Accountability

Courts emphasized:

  • States must act within constitutional limits.
  • Deportees must be given opportunities to prove citizenship.
  • Accountability measures must be enforced.

14. Conclusion: A Test of Governance and Humanity

The Sunali Khatun Freed Return to India 2025 case is more than a legal dispute — it is a test of governance, democracy, and human dignity. Unless systemic reforms are undertaken, families will remain vulnerable, and public trust in institutions will erode.

The controversy underscores the urgency of balancing citizenship law with compassion, electoral integrity, and governance accountability.


🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More

Operation Sagar Bandhu: Indian Navy Strong Deployment of Four Additional Warships to Deliver 1,000 Tons of HADR Material to Sri Lanka

The Indian Navy has deployed four additional warships—INS Gharial, LCU 54, LCU 51, and LCU 57—to deliver 1,000 tons of Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) supplies to cyclone-affected areas of Sri Lanka as part of Operation Sagar Bandhu. The mission was launched to provide urgent Search & Rescue (SAR) support and vital relief material to the island nation following severe cyclone devastation.

This action underscores India’s longstanding commitment to supporting its Indian Ocean Region (IOR) neighbours in times of crisis.


Earlier Assistance by INS Vikrant, INS Udaygiri & INS Sukanya

Prior to the latest deployment, three Indian Navy ships—INS Vikrant, INS Udaygiri, and INS Sukanya—had already extended critical assistance, including:

  • Delivery of essential relief stores

  • Heli-borne Search & Rescue missions

  • Medical support and evacuation assistance

Their rapid response played a key role in stabilizing relief operations during the immediate aftermath of the cyclone.




Arrival of LCUs and Scheduled Deployment of INS Gharial

The three Landing Craft Utility vessels—LCU 54, LCU 51, and LCU 57—arrived in Colombo on 07 December 2025, where they handed over critical relief material to Sri Lankan authorities. These supplies include food items, tents, medicines, hygiene kits, generators, and other essential resources required for community rehabilitation.

INS Gharial is scheduled to reach Trincomalee on 08 December 2025, continuing the humanitarian mission with sizeable HADR consignments.


Strengthening India–Sri Lanka Partnership Through Humanitarian Outreach

The Indian Navy’s deployment of ships carrying 1,000 tons of HADR supplies reflects:

  • India’s rapid response capability in regional humanitarian crises

  • Strong people-to-people ties between India and Sri Lanka

  • India’s steadfast commitment to ensuring safety and security across the Indian Ocean Region

Operation Sagar Bandhu continues the tradition of India’s maritime outreach, following earlier missions such as Sagar, Sagar-II, and Sagar-III that extended assistance to nations across the IOR.


Conclusion: Operation Sagar Bandhu 

Through Operation Sagar Bandhu, India has once again demonstrated its role as a dependable first responder in the Indian Ocean Region. With multiple warships engaged in relief operations and a substantial volume of aid delivered, the mission reaffirms the Indian Navy’s humanitarian leadership and the deep friendship shared between India and Sri Lanka.


For more real-time updates, visit Channel 6 Network.

Source: PIB

UPI Recognized as World’s Largest Real-Time Payment System by IMF; Accounts for 49% of Global Transactions

Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has once again reinforced India’s global leadership in digital payments. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) report titled “Growing Retail Digital Payments (The Value of Interoperability)” published in June 2025, UPI is the world’s largest retail fast-payment system (FPS) in terms of transaction volume.

Additionally, the ACI Worldwide ‘Prime Time for Real-Time’ 2024 report confirms that UPI accounts for a remarkable 49% share of all global real-time payment transactions, significantly outperforming other major platforms worldwide.

This information was shared by Minister of State for Finance Shri Pankaj Chaudhary in a written reply in the Lok Sabha.




India Leads Global Real-Time Payments: Comparative Snapshot

The ACI Worldwide report provides a comparative overview of global real-time payment systems, highlighting UPI’s unparalleled scale and efficiency.

UPI’s Global Position

Country Transaction Volume (in Billions) Global Share
India (UPI) 129.3 49%
Brazil 37.4 14%
Thailand 20.4 8%
China 17.2 6%
South Korea 9.1 3%
Others 52.8 20%
Total 266.2 100%

UPI’s near-half share of global real-time transactions underscores its robustness, interoperability, and widespread adoption across urban and rural India.


Government and RBI Interventions Driving Digital Inclusion

To accelerate the adoption of digital payments—particularly among small-scale merchants—the Government, RBI, and NPCI have launched targeted initiatives, including:

1. BHIM-UPI Incentive Scheme

Designed to promote low-value digital transactions and encourage first-time users.

2. Payments Infrastructure Development Fund (PIDF)

Providing grants to banks and fintech firms for deploying digital payment infrastructure such as POS terminals and QR codes in Tier 3 to Tier 6 cities.

  • 5.45 crore digital touchpoints deployed under PIDF as of 31 October 2025

  • 56.86 crore QR codes deployed to 6.5 crore merchants across India in FY 2024–25

These interventions significantly enhance digital penetration, ease of doing business, and financial inclusion.


Expanding RuPay and UPI Across Public Services

The Government, RBI, and NPCI have undertaken nationwide efforts to deepen the use of RuPay cards and Unified Payments Interface in:

  • Public service platforms

  • Transportation networks

  • E-commerce ecosystems

  • Utility payments

  • Retail and MSME sectors

This expansion ensures seamless digital transactions for citizens across multiple interfaces.


Conclusion

India’s leadership in global digital payments is the result of sustained innovation, robust public digital infrastructure, and coordinated institutional efforts. With Unified Payments Interface commanding the largest share of real-time payment transactions worldwide, India’s digital economy continues to expand rapidly while setting global standards for interoperability, accessibility, and financial inclusion.

The continued rollout of PIDF infrastructure, merchant incentives, and RuPay-UPI integration positions India to further strengthen its status as the world’s foremost digital payments powerhouse.


For more real-time updates, visit Channel 6 Network.

Source: PIB