Civic Boss Resignation Controversy 2025: The political landscape of West Bengal has been jolted by the Cooch Behar Civic Boss Resignation Controversy 2025, where Rabindranath Ghosh, chairman of the Cooch Behar municipality, has refused to step down despite directives from the district Trinamool Congress (TMC) leadership. His defiance has triggered factionalism within the party, raising concerns about governance, unity, and electoral prospects in North Bengal — a region where the BJP remains a formidable challenger.

2. Background: TMC vs BJP in Cooch Behar

Cooch Behar has historically been a political battleground:

• In the 2021 Assembly elections, BJP won seven of nine seats, while TMC managed only two.
• The balance shifted slightly after Udayan Guha won the Dinhata by‑election, raising TMC’s tally to three MLAs.
• In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, TMC reclaimed the Cooch Behar seat by projecting unity.

The current feud threatens to undo that fragile unity, potentially giving the BJP an advantage in the upcoming 2026 Assembly polls.

3. Civic Boss Resignation Controversy 2025: The Directive to Resign

On November 11, 2025, district president Abhijit De Bhowmik sent Ghosh a WhatsApp message instructing him to resign within seven days. A written communication followed the next day. Ghosh, however, rejected the directive, arguing that only the state leadership or Mamata Banerjee herself had the authority to demand his resignation. He declared: “If the state leadership or Mamata Banerjee asks me to step down, I will do so without a minute’s delay.”

4. Ghosh’s Defiance and Supporters’ Mobilization

More than a week after the directive, Ghosh remains firmly in his post. His supporters have:

• Escalated the matter to Mamata Banerjee, sending a letter signed by over 500 people, including senior leaders like Partha Pratim Roy and Binay Krishna Barman.
• Threatened to take to the streets if attempts to unseat him continue.
• Gathered regularly at Roy’s residence to strategize.

This mobilization reflects the deep factional divide within the district TMC.

5. The Two Factions in Cooch Behar TMC

According to sources, the district committee is split into two camps:

• Faction One: Led by district president Abhijit De Bhowmik, supported by state minister Udayan Guha, MP Jagadish Chandra Barama Basunia, and district chairman Girindranath Barman.
• Faction Two: Led by Rabindranath Ghosh, supported by Partha Pratim Roy, Khokan Mia, Binay Krishna Barman, Parimal Barman, Azizul Haque, and Laxmikant Sarkar.

This division has created a parallel leadership structure, undermining party discipline.

6. Political Observers’ Concerns

Analysts warn that the timing of such open discord is damaging for TMC:

• In North Bengal, BJP considers the region its stronghold.
• In 2021, BJP won 33 of 54 seats in the region.
• With Assembly polls only months away, factional feuds in a key district like Cooch Behar place TMC at a disadvantage.

Observers argue that unless Mamata Banerjee intervenes decisively, the feud could erode TMC’s electoral prospects.

7. Governance Implications

The controversy has broader governance implications:

• Municipal stability: Prolonged factionalism could paralyze civic administration in Cooch Behar.
• Public trust: Citizens may lose confidence in TMC’s ability to govern effectively.
• Electoral credibility: Internal disputes weaken TMC’s claim of being a united front against BJP.

8. Historical Context: Factionalism in Bengal Politics

Factionalism is not new in Bengal politics. Both TMC and its predecessor, the Congress, have faced internal splits. However, the stakes are higher in North Bengal, where BJP has made significant inroads. The current feud recalls earlier episodes where internal divisions cost parties crucial seats.

9. Possible Outcomes

Several scenarios could unfold:

• Mamata’s intervention: If she orders Ghosh to resign, the dispute may settle.
• No‑confidence motion: District leadership may attempt to remove Ghosh through the civic board.
• Street protests: Ghosh’s supporters may escalate agitation, deepening the crisis.
• Electoral fallout: BJP could exploit the discord to consolidate its position.

10. Conclusion: A Test of Leadership

The Cooch Behar Civic Boss Resignation Controversy 2025 is a test of Mamata Banerjee’s leadership and TMC’s organizational discipline. Ghosh’s defiance reflects the fragility of party unity in North Bengal, while the factional feud underscores the challenges of balancing local leadership with central authority.

With Assembly elections looming, the outcome of this controversy will shape not only the future of Cooch Behar but also the broader trajectory of TMC in Bengal politics.

🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

• Election Commission of India (ECI – Electoral Roll Management): https://eci.gov.in
• Chief Electoral Officer, West Bengal: https://ceowestbengal.nic.in
• Ministry of Home Affairs – State Governance Division: https://mha.gov.in
• Press Information Bureau (Government of India): https://pib.gov.in
• West Bengal Municipal Affairs Department: https://wbmunicipal.gov.in

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More

SIR Assistance Camp Fire Controversy 2025: On November 24, 2025, the political atmosphere in West Bengal intensified after the Trinamool Congress (TMC) alleged that BJP workers vandalized and set fire to a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) assistance camp in Ward No. 6 of Kalyani town, Nadia district. The camp, located adjacent to the TMC party office, was meant to help citizens with voter roll verification during the ongoing SIR exercise.

The BJP immediately denied the allegations, claiming the incident was the result of internal conflicts within the ruling party. The controversy has added fuel to the already heated debate surrounding the SIR process, which has been marred by reports of BLO stress, suicides, and protests.

2. The Incident: What Happened in Kalyani

According to the TMC, the camp was vandalized and torched by BJP supporters. Videos circulated on social media showed damaged property and burnt equipment. The TMC described the attack as a deliberate act of vandalism, aimed at disrupting assistance to voters during the SIR.

Police officials confirmed that a manhunt has been initiated to identify and arrest those responsible. However, BJP leaders dismissed the allegations, insisting that the fire was linked to internal disputes within TMC ranks.

3. The SIR Context: Why Camps Matter

The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls is a massive exercise across West Bengal, involving:

• Distribution of 7.64 crore enumeration forms.
• Verification of voter details by Booth Level Officers (BLOs).
• Digitisation of collected data.
• Assistance camps set up by political parties to help citizens with corrections and submissions.

These camps are crucial for ensuring that voters, especially in rural and semi‑urban areas, can access support during the verification process.

4. Political Reactions: TMC vs BJP

• TMC’s Position: The party accused BJP of orchestrating the attack to intimidate voters and disrupt the SIR process. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has already criticized the Election Commission for imposing unrealistic workloads on BLOs, and the camp fire adds another layer of grievance.
• BJP’s Response: Local BJP leaders denied involvement, claiming the incident was a result of TMC’s internal factionalism. They accused the ruling party of politicizing the issue to gain sympathy.

The clash reflects the deep mistrust between the two parties, especially in Nadia district, a politically sensitive region.

5. Governance Challenges: Law and Order at Stake

The incident raises serious governance questions:

• Security of electoral infrastructure: How safe are assistance camps and BLOs during the SIR?
• Neutrality of the process: Can voter roll revision be conducted fairly amid political violence?
• Role of police: Ensuring impartial investigation and preventing further escalation.

The credibility of the SIR process depends on maintaining law and order and protecting citizens’ access to electoral services.

6. Human Cost: BLO Stress and Suicides

The camp fire controversy comes against the backdrop of BLO deaths linked to SIR stress. In Nadia district itself, BLO Rinku Tarafdar was found dead, leaving a note about the “inhuman workload.” Her death triggered political outrage, with Mamata Banerjee asking the Election Commission: “How many more lives will be lost?”

The Kalyani incident adds to the perception that the SIR process is not only administratively flawed but also politically volatile.

7. Historical Context: Electoral Violence in Bengal

West Bengal has a long history of electoral violence and political clashes:

• From the panchayat elections to Assembly polls, clashes between rival parties are common.
• Camps, rallies, and booths often become flashpoints.
• The Kalyani fire fits into this larger pattern of politicized conflict around electoral processes.

8. SIR Assistance Camp Fire Controversy 2025: Broader Implications for Democracy

The controversy has implications beyond Kalyani:

• Public trust: Citizens may lose confidence in the fairness of the SIR.
• Electoral participation: Fear of violence could discourage voter engagement.
• Political stability: Escalating clashes could destabilize governance ahead of the 2026 elections.

Ensuring transparency and safety in the SIR is essential to safeguard democratic credibility.

9. Recommendations for Reform

Experts suggest:

• Neutral monitoring: Independent observers for assistance camps.
• Enhanced security: Police protection for BLOs and camps.
• Clear guidelines: Election Commission must regulate party‑run camps.
• Community involvement: Local NGOs can help ensure safe voter assistance.

10. Conclusion: A Test for Electoral Integrity

The West Bengal SIR Assistance Camp Fire Controversy 2025 is more than a local incident; it is a test of India’s electoral integrity. With TMC alleging BJP’s involvement and BJP denying the charge, the truth may take time to emerge. But the larger issue remains: can electoral roll revision be conducted fairly and peacefully in West Bengal?

The answer will shape not only the credibility of the 2026 Assembly elections but also the future of democratic governance in the state.

🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

• Election Commission of India (ECI – Electoral Roll Management): https://eci.gov.in
• Chief Electoral Officer, West Bengal: https://ceowestbengal.nic.in
• Ministry of Home Affairs – Law and Order Division: https://mha.gov.in
• Press Information Bureau (Government of India): https://pib.gov.in
• National Voters’ Service Portal (NVSP): https://www.nvsp.in

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More

Protest Against SIR Workload 2025: On November 24, 2025, Booth Level Officers (BLOs) across West Bengal announced a march in Kolkata to protest against the excessive workload imposed during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. BLOs, who are primarily teachers, para‑teachers, and government staff, argued that the Election Commission of India (ECI) has set unrealistic deadlines, forcing them to complete tasks equivalent to two years’ work in just one month.

The protest, organized by the BLO Adhikar Raksha Committee, reflects growing frustration among frontline electoral staff and raises serious questions about governance, electoral transparency, and worker rights.

2. The SIR Process: What BLOs Are Asked to Do

The Special Intensive Revision is a comprehensive exercise to update voter rolls before the 2026 Assembly elections. BLOs are tasked with:

• Distributing enumeration forms to households.
• Collecting completed forms and verifying voter details.
• Uploading data into the Election Commission’s app.
• Correcting errors and handling duplicate entries.

The exercise began on November 4, 2025, and is scheduled to end on December 4, 2025, with draft rolls to be published on December 9, 2025.

3. BLOs’ Complaints: “Two Years’ Work in a Month”

BLOs argue that the workload is inhuman:

• Door‑to‑door verification across thousands of households.
• Digitisation of millions of forms within weeks.
• Constant phone calls from voters and supervisors.
• Personal expenses on stationery, transport, and mobile data.

One BLO explained: “We have been asked to complete tasks within a short period of time, but such work usually takes more than two years.”

4. Protest Against SIR Workload 2025: Deaths and Health Toll

Reports indicate that several BLOs across states have died due to stress:

• In West Bengal, at least two BLOs died by suicide.
• In Kerala and Rajasthan, BLOs collapsed after days of overwork.
• In Gujarat, BLOs reported illness linked to exhaustion.

These tragedies have intensified anger, with BLOs demanding compensation for families and immediate workload relief.

5. Political Reactions

• Mamata Banerjee, Chief Minister of West Bengal, wrote to the Chief Election Commissioner demanding a halt to the SIR, citing BLO deaths and “inhuman pressure.”
• Rahul Gandhi compared the SIR to demonetisation and the Covid lockdown, calling it “chaos imposed on citizens.”
• Mallikarjun Kharge argued that the actual number of BLO deaths was far higher than reported.

The issue has thus become a national political controversy, with opposition parties accusing the Election Commission of negligence.

6. BLO Adhikar Raksha Committee’s Demands

The committee leading the Kolkata march has outlined specific demands:

• Extension of deadlines for SIR tasks.
• Reimbursement of expenses incurred during enumeration.
• Compensation for deceased BLOs’ families.
• Recognition of BLOs as essential electoral staff with proper benefits.
• Reduction of workload and clearer guidelines.

7. Governance Challenges

The crisis highlights systemic governance issues:

• Unrealistic timelines imposed by the Election Commission.
• Understaffing, forcing BLOs to juggle regular duties with SIR responsibilities.
• Technology gaps, with the BLO app often malfunctioning.
• Financial strain, as BLOs spend personal money without reimbursement.

8. Broader Implications for Democracy

The BLO protests raise fundamental questions about India’s electoral process:

• Can voter rolls be updated fairly if BLOs are overworked?
• Will errors and omissions disenfranchise genuine voters?
• Does the Election Commission risk losing credibility if frontline staff revolt?

The health and morale of BLOs directly affect the integrity of elections.

9. Historical Context: BLOs as Democracy’s Backbone

Since their introduction, BLOs have been the foot soldiers of democracy, ensuring that every voter is counted. Yet they remain underpaid, overworked, and underappreciated. The current protests echo past grievances about workload, recognition, and compensation.

10. Recommendations for Reform

Experts suggest:

• Staggered timelines for voter roll revision.
• Hiring additional staff to support BLOs.
• Improved technology for faster digitisation.
• Compensation packages for BLO families.
• Policy reform to recognize BLOs as permanent electoral staff.

11. Conclusion: A Cry for Justice

The West Bengal BLO Protest Against SIR Workload 2025 is not just about workload; it is about dignity, recognition, and the survival of democracy’s frontline workers. Unless the Election Commission addresses their demands, the credibility of the 2026 Assembly elections may be at risk.

The BLOs’ cry — “Two years’ work in a month” — is a reminder that democracy cannot function without respecting the human limits of those who safeguard it.

🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

• Election Commission of India (ECI): https://eci.gov.in
• Chief Electoral Officer, West Bengal: https://ceowestbengal.nic.in
• National Voters’ Service Portal (NVSP): https://www.nvsp.in
• Ministry of Law and Justice – Representation of People Act, 1950: https://legislative.gov.in
• Press Information Bureau (Government of India): https://pib.gov.in

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More

Reverse Migration in Bengal 2025: In November 2025, the border village of Hakimpur in North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, witnessed a phenomenon described by locals as “history coming full circle.” For decades, Hakimpur was a sanctuary for refugees fleeing violence in East Pakistan during Partition (1947) and again during the Bangladesh Liberation War (1971). Today, however, the flow has reversed: undocumented Bangladeshi migrants are voluntarily walking back across the border into Bangladesh, fearing exposure during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

2. The Trigger: Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Electoral Rolls

The Election Commission of India (ECI) launched the SIR across West Bengal in November 2025. BLOs (Booth Level Officers) began door‑to‑door verification of voter records, scrutinizing documents such as voter ID, Aadhaar, and ration cards. For undocumented migrants who had lived for years on forged papers or borrowed identities, the risk of detection became too high.

Rather than face legal consequences, many chose to quietly return to Bangladesh, carrying belongings in polythene bags tied to bamboo poles.

3. Reverse Migration in Bengal 2025: Voices from the Ground

Local elders and residents described the unprecedented sight:

• Haripada Mondal (79): “I have never seen so many illegal Bangladeshis waiting to return. They know they have no documents, so they are going back on their own.”
• Animesh Majumdar (84): Recalled cooking rice for refugees under a banyan tree in 1971. Today, he watched migrants gather under the same tree, preparing to leave.
• Ajay Pal (70): “All my life I have seen only inflow, from 1947 to 1971 and even later. This is the first time I am watching people queue up to go back. It is unsettling.”

These testimonies highlight the emotional resonance of the reversal, linking present events to historical memory.

4. Community Response: Feeding the Departing Migrants

Despite the reversal, the village’s humanitarian instinct remained unchanged. Residents lined up with utensils, thermos flasks, puffed rice, biscuits, lentils, and tea to feed departing migrants. As shopkeeper Mantu Mondal (50) explained: “You feed anyone who is needy on this road — that is our rule. In 1971, people were entering. Today, people are leaving. But feeding them remains constant.”

This continuity of compassion underscores the shared humanity across borders, even amid political and legal complexities.

5. Migrants’ Perspective: Fear of Verification

Migrants admitted their decision was pragmatic:

• Shahidul (32): Worked in a brick kiln in Bongaon using a borrowed ID. “I cannot show any legal papers. Better to return before the checks begin.”

Most were daily wage laborers from Bangladesh’s Khulna, Satkhira, Bagerhat, and Jessore districts, who had crossed illegally years ago for work.

6. Security Forces Confirm the Trend

Border Security Force (BSF) personnel reported a sharp increase in reverse crossings since mid‑November. They emphasized that the movement was voluntary, not forced, with migrants openly admitting their undocumented status.

7. Historical Context: From Inflow to Outflow

Hakimpur’s story is deeply tied to South Asian history:

• 1947 Partition: Refugees fled communal violence in East Pakistan.
• 1971 Liberation War: Thousands escaped Operation Searchlight and Pakistani army atrocities.
• Post‑1971 decades: Economic migrants continued to cross into India.

For seventy years, the border belt saw inflows. The current reversal marks a unique moment in history.

8. Governance Challenges

The reverse migration highlights several governance issues:

• Electoral integrity: Ensuring rolls are free of illegal entries.
• Border management: Preventing future undocumented crossings.
• Humanitarian concerns: Managing voluntary returns with dignity.
• Community dynamics: Balancing compassion with legal enforcement.

9. Political Implications

The phenomenon has political ramifications:

• BJP narrative: May highlight the reversal as proof of strict verification.
• TMC concerns: Could raise humanitarian issues and criticize stress on BLOs.
• Electoral stakes: North 24 Parganas is politically sensitive, making the SIR a flashpoint.

10. Broader Lessons for Policy

Experts suggest:

• Strengthening border infrastructure.
• Ensuring fair verification processes that do not harass genuine citizens.
• Providing legal clarity on voluntary returns.
• Documenting migration patterns for future policy.

11. Conclusion: History Moves Outward

As dusk settled on Hakimpur, silhouettes of migrants disappeared into fading light. Villager Ajay Pal summed it up: “This road brought thousands in. Today it is sending them back.”

The Reverse Migration in Bengal 2025 is more than a local event; it is a symbolic turning point in South Asian migration history, shaped by electoral governance, border politics, and human resilience.

🔗 Government External Links

For further reading and official updates, here are relevant government sources:

• Election Commission of India (ECI – Electoral Roll Management): https://eci.gov.in
• Chief Electoral Officer, West Bengal: https://ceowestbengal.nic.in
• Ministry of Home Affairs – Border Management Division: https://mha.gov.in
• Press Information Bureau (Government of India): https://pib.gov.in
• National Register of Citizens (NRC – Policy Documents): https://registerofcitizens.assam.gov.in

Also read: Home | Channel 6 Network – Latest News, Breaking Updates: Politics, Business, Tech & More